Reactions induites par des protons de 155 MeV sur des noyaux legers
Références (7)
Nuclear Phys.
(1961)- J. Teillac, communication...
Physics Letters
(1962)
Cited by (33)
Measurement of nuclear activation cross sections of protons on natural carbon for proton beam energies between 100 and 220 MeV
2019, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and AtomsCitation Excerpt :The activation cross sections for the natC(p,x)11C-reaction have been measured as a function of the proton energy during the last seven decades by several groups [3–9] and most of the data have been collected in the EXFOR database [10].
Measurement of proton-induced target fragmentation cross sections in carbon
2016, Nuclear Physics ACitation Excerpt :The human body is mainly composed of hydrogen, carbon, oxygen, and calcium nuclei, and the production cross section of positron emitters (10C, 11C, 13N, 14O, 15O, 38K, 38Ca, and 39Ca) generated between the three elements excluding hydrogen and incident proton nucleus is important to estimate the range and exposure dose distribution in the patient's body. The cross sections of 11C, 15O and 13N were measured at several proton energies [4–22]; however, those quantity and accuracy are insufficient yet. The cross sections of 10C, 14O, 38K and 39Ca were measured only at few points [11,23,24].
Experimental study for the production cross sections of positron emitters induced from <sup>12</sup>C and <sup>16</sup>O nuclei by low-energy proton beams
2013, Radiation MeasurementsCitation Excerpt :The cross sections of the three reaction channels for 16O are shown in Figs. 3(b–d). Our measurements of the 16O(p, pn)15O reaction channel were in good agreement with the previous experimental data of Valentin et al. (1963) and Albouy et al. (1962) within the uncertainties. The uncertainties of our measurement (∼5.0%) were better than those of the previous experiments (7–10%) of Valentin et al. (1963) and Albouy et al. (1962).
Parameterization of the total cross-section for (p,<sup>7</sup>Be) reaction
2004, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and AtomsCitation Excerpt :The following experimental cross-sections for the production of 7Be from as many as 23 targets were used to find values of the parameters: Carbon [3–37], Nitrogen [3,7,9,10,19,20,24–26], [31,33,34,38–45], Oxygen [3,4,7–10,19,22,24,25,28,29,31,33,38,45–56], Fluorine [3,7,25,33,38,48], Sodium [3,7], Magnesium [3,10,24,25,28,29,31,38,44,47,50,52,57], Aluminum [6,7,10,13,23–25,31,38,47,49,50,57–66], Silicon [10,24,25,28,29,31,38,44,47,50,52,58,67–69], Titanium [24,25,31,50,70], Vanadium [24,47,50,71–73], Manganese [24,31,47,50], Iron [3,19,24,25,28,29,31,47,49,50,52,74–80], Cobalt [3,24,31,47,50,72,74,75], Nickel [24,25,28,29,31,47,49,50,52], Copper [6,24,25,31,50,81–83], Yttrium [25,50,84], Zirconium [25,47,84], Niobium [25,47,85], Silver [6,23,49,66,86–93], Tantalum [91,94–96], Gold [6,23,25,49,73,97], Lead [91,98], Uranium [49,66,91,99]. The search for good values of the parameters could not be performed by automatic fit with the least squares or maximum likelihood method because sets of the experimental data exist which clearly do not agree with other cross-sections.