Selected gamma-ray energies and emission probabilities for the decay of 125Sb and 154Eu

https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-2889(90)90133-2Get rights and content

Abstract

The energies of 17 γ rays from 125Sb and 35 from 154Eu have been determined with typical uncertainties of 5–10 eV. Relative γ-ray emission rates have also been measured for 16 γ rays from 125Sb and 24 from 154Eu. These data will make more useful the mixed standard of 125Sb, 154Eu and 155Eu that is often used to calibrate Ge γ-ray detectors.

References (11)

  • B.M. Coursey et al.

    Nucl. Instrum. Methods

    (1982)
  • K. Debertin et al.

    Nucl. Instrum. Methods

    (1979)
  • R.C. Greenwood et al.

    Nucl. Instrum. Methods

    (1970)
  • R.G. Helmer

    Nucl. Data Sheets

    (1987)
  • R.G. Helmer et al.

    Nucl. Instrum. Methods

    (1971)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (17)

  • Evaluation of the <sup>125</sup>Sb nuclear decay data

    2016, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
    Citation Excerpt :

    The experimental and recommended γ-ray relative intensities from 125Sb β− decay are listed in Table 3. The measured γ-ray relative intensities have been reported by Andreev et al. [23], Sergolle [24], Charalambus et al. [19], Nagpal et al. [20], Gupta et al.[21], Ila et al. [25], Walters et al. [14], Ardisson et al. [26], Gehrke et al. [27], Prasad [28], Roney et al. [29], Singh et al. [30], Iwata et al. [31], Wang et al. [32], Longoria-Gandara [33], Helmer [15], Meyer [16], Schotzig et al. [34], Smith et al. [35], Fawwaz et al. [36] and Sainath et al. [17]. The uncertainty of the measured value in Sergolle [24] is not given.

  • Beta decay of the fission product <sup>125</sup>Sb and a new complete evaluation of absolute gamma ray transition intensities

    2012, Radiation Physics and Chemistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    In earlier studies, Longoria-Gandara et al. (1990) had pointed out discrepancies in the data of the isotope and adopted an arbitrary inflation of uncertainties method for the evaluation. Later some new sets of experimental measurements of the isotopes were published (Helmer, 1990; Smith et al., 1992; Fawaz and Stewart, 1993; Sainath et al., 1998) and few new evaluation methodologies (described later) were proposed. The availability of these methodologies and later measurements motivated the present evaluation of the relative intensities.

  • Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 125

    2011, Nuclear Data Sheets
  • Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 154

    2009, Nuclear Data Sheets
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text