Beam loss rates with an internal gas target in an electron-cooled storage ring Implications for luminosity optimization
References (13)
- et al.
Ann. Phys. (NY)
(1958) Phys. Rep.
(1990)- et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1989) Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1993)Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1985)Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1984)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (12)
Experiences of operating CELSIUS with a hydrogen pellet target
2004, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated EquipmentCitation Excerpt :Electron cooling is however only marginally improving the beam lifetime in the presence of pellet target, especially of this thickness. This is because the hydrogen target thickness of 1.1×1016 cm−2 (March 2002) is already near the “knee” as discussed in Ref. [12]. On the other hand, most experiments with CELSIUS/WASA will be performed at energies above 1 GeV, in which case also the uncooled beam lifetime will be long compared to the beam preparation time.
Few-nucleon physics with stored, cooled beams
1998, Nuclear Physics AStorage rings for nuclear physics
1997, Nuclear Physics ADevelopment of internal jet targets for high-luminosity experiments
1995, Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, AInternal targets - a review
1995, Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, APolarized gas targets
2003, Reports on Progress in Physics
Copyright © 1993 Published by Elsevier B.V.