Performance of the OPAL jet chamber
References (16)
OPAL Silicon Microvertex Detector
CERN/LEPC/90-5
(1990)Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1988)Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1989)Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1986)Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1992)Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1987)Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1986)- et al.
OPAL Internal Note, 04/CENDE-0511
(1990)
Cited by (65)
Search for Dirac magnetic monopoles in e<sup>+</sup> e<sup>-</sup> collisions with the OPAL detector at LEP2
2008, Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy PhysicsMeasurements of R<inf>b</inf> in e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup>collisions at √s between 182 and 209 GeV
2005, Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy PhysicsCitation Excerpt :A breakdown of the systematic uncertainty at 207 GeV is given in Table 3, and the total systematic error is given for all energies in Table 4. To asses the uncertainty on the correction for interference, we used the results of a study made in [3] by replacing the Zfitter predictions with those of the KK2f program [7]. We assign the difference between the two predictions as a systematic uncertainty.
Search for associated production of massive states decaying into two photons in e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> annihilations at √s = 88-209 GeV
2002, Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy PhysicsGenuine correlations of like-sign particles in hadronic Z<sup>0</sup> decays
2001, Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy PhysicsMeasurement of the branching ratio for the process b → τ<sup>-</sup>ν̄<inf>τ</inf>X
2001, Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy PhysicsMeasurement of the branching ratio for D<inf>s</inf><sup>-</sup> → τ<sup>-</sup>ν̄<inf>τ</inf> decays
2001, Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy PhysicsCitation Excerpt :Therefore b→ℓ, b→c→ℓ and c→ℓ decays are reweighted to reproduce the lepton momentum spectrum in the rest frame of the b or c hadron as predicted by the ACCMM [30], the ISGW [31] and the ISGW∗∗ [32] models. The same parameters as in [14] are used. The largest difference between the results obtained using the different models is taken as systematic uncertainty.
- 1
Now at II. Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Hamburg, Germany.
- 2
Now at DESY, Hamburg, Germany.