Deexcitation of single excited nuclei in the QMD model
References (15)
- et al.
Nucl. Phys. A
(1985) - et al.
Nucl. Phys. A
(1988) Phys. Rep.
(1991)- et al.
Phys. Lett. B
(1991) - et al.
Phys. Rev. C
(1976) - et al.
Phys. Rev. C
(1983) Rep. Prog. Phys.
(1990)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (13)
Liquid–Gas phase transition in nuclei
2019, Progress in Particle and Nuclear PhysicsCitation Excerpt :As with most dynamical models a statistical decay code must be coupled to describe the long time evolution (called an after-burner). However for the code of Ref. [126] there is no need to supplement the QMD calculations by an additional evaporation model [138]. It is important to emphasize here that QMD codes are certainly better adapted for the higher incident energies.
Nuclear multifragmentation and phase transition for hot nuclei
2008, Progress in Particle and Nuclear PhysicsMultifragmentation - What the data tell us about the different models
2001, Nuclear Physics AThe multifragmentation of spectator matter
1997, Nuclear Physics ALiquid-gas phase transition in nuclei
2019, arXivDecay modes of highly excited nuclei
2018, Nuclear Science and Techniques
Copyright © 1993 Published by Elsevier B.V.