Cross sections for proton-deutron scattering from 1.0 to 10.0 MeV☆
References (35)
Nucl. Phys.
(1969)- et al.
Phys. Lett.
(1967) - et al.
Phys. Rev.
(1953) - T. R. King, J. J. Kraushaar, R. A. Ristinen, R. Smythe and D. M. Stupin, to be...
- et al.
ORNL-4179
(1967) - et al.
- et al.
Phys. Rev.
(1947) - et al.
Phys. Rev.
(1950) - et al.
Phys. Rev.
(1951) - et al.
Phys. Rev.
(1951)
Phys. Rev.
Phys. Rev.
Phys. Rev.
Phys. Rev.
J. Phys. Soc. Japan
M.A. thesis
Nucl. Phys.
Cited by (77)
Development of a reference database for Ion Beam Analysis and future perspectives
2011, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and AtomsCitation Excerpt :These incorrect data are also included in Ref. [56]. As long as no further data are available, the suggested cross sections for use at backward angles are those from Ref. [52] and the data set based on the absolute values by Langley [49,55]. The two most recent publications [53,54] present a few cross sections data points between 3.1 and 3.7 MeV and between 0.4 and 1.0 MeV for angles below 135°.
Measurement of the D(p,p)D cross section at laboratory backward angles of 151° and 167°
2007, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and AtomsCitation Excerpt :While the general trend suggests a slight decrease in cross sections with increasing beam energy, the difference in values between 151° and 167° laboratory angles are statistically insignificant. Scherr et al. data were measured at 150° laboratory angle [1], Kocher and Clegg data were measured at 153° laboratory angle [2], and Langley’s data were measured at 170° laboratory angle. Both Scherr’s data and Kocher’s data were measured from a D2 gas target, while Langley’s data were measured from a thin film of (800 nm) ErD2 on Kovar substrate.
Indirect study of <sup>19</sup>Ne states near the <sup>18</sup>F + p threshold
2007, Nuclear Physics AIon beam analysis methods in the studies of plasma facing materials in controlled fusion devices
2003, VacuumCitation Excerpt :Another reaction for deuterium analysis, D(p,p)D [18,19], is cheaper than the one involving 3He, but depth profiling is limited.
X<sup>2</sup> analysis of p-d differential cross sections at low energies
2001, Nuclear Physics ASignatures of three-nucleon interactions in few-nucleon systems
2012, Reports on Progress in Physics
- ☆
Work supported in part by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.
- ††
Present address: Department of Physics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514.