Does the stigma shape the stutterer?
References (10)
- et al.
The relationship between stuttering and academic achievement in children
J. Commun. Dis.
(1969) - et al.
Research and Experiment in Stuttering
(1968) - et al.
Functional speech disorders and personality: A decade of research
J. Speech Hear. Dis.
(1971) - et al.
The effect of teacher-pupil contact involving praise on the sociometric choices of students
J. Educ. Psychol.
(1960) Functional speech disorders and personality: A survey of the research
J. Speech Hear. Res.
(1958)
Cited by (15)
Stigma and the Hispanic stuttering experience: A qualitative study
2021, Journal of Communication DisordersCitation Excerpt :Negative stereotypes of people who stutter have also been found among teachers and even speech-language pathologists. Research shows that classroom teachers hold negative opinions of students who stutter, and that teachers’ beliefs about people who stutter do not differ from those in non-teaching professions (Arnold, Li, & Goltl, 2015; Dorsey & Guenther, 2000; Woods, 1978). Similar opinions have been found in surveys of speech-language pathologists, where a significant number agreed there were personality traits common to those who stutter and many held unsubstantiated beliefs about early intervention (Cooper & Cooper, 1996).
Examining implicit and explicit attitudes toward stuttering
2018, Journal of Fluency DisordersCitation Excerpt :It will also be important to evaluate both types of attitudes among those who play important roles in the lives of people who stutter at every stage of life. For instance, since teachers and speech therapists have been shown to self-report negative attitudes toward children who stutter as compared to their typically-fluent peers (Arnold et al., 2015; Woods, 1978; Yeakle & Cooper, 1986), it may be important to assess implicit attitudes in these groups, as well. It will also be important to further investigate the relative strength of negativity of implicit and explicit attitudes toward stuttering, since future studies may either confirm or contradict the present finding that explicit attitudes toward stuttering are more negative than implicit attitudes.
Rethinking covert stuttering
2017, Journal of Fluency DisordersCitation Excerpt :Indirect delegitimization occurs when another’s actions do not intend to but, nonetheless have the effect of taking agency away from an individual. Previous research has shown that listener behavior changes in response to hearing stuttering (Boehmler, 1958; Burley & Rinaldi, 1986; Panico et al., 2005; Rosenberg & Curtiss, 1954) and that societal norms stigmatize stuttering (Blood et al., 2003; Boyle & Blood, 2015; Boyle, 2013, 2015; Corcoran & Stewart, 1998; Woods, 1978). Skin conductance studies have shown implicit emotional and physiological responses in people listening to stuttered speech (Guntupalli, Erik Everhart, Kalinowski, Nanjundeswaran, & Saltuklaroglu, 2007; Guntupalli, Kalinowski, Nanjundeswaran, Saltuklaroglu, & Everhart, 2006; Zhang, Kalinowski, Saltuklaroglu, & Hudock, 2010).
Effects of perceived causality on perceptions of persons who stutter
2009, Journal of Fluency DisordersDon't call me Billy Budd
1992, Journal of Fluency DisordersThe stutterer and stuttering: Personality correlates
1982, Topics in Catalysis