The efficacy of rational-emotive therapy: A quantitative review of the outcome research

https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(91)90113-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The results from a meta-analysis of 70 Rational-Emotive Therapy (RET) outcome studies are reported. A total of 236 comparisons of RET to baseline, control groups, Cognitive Behavior Modification, Behavior Therapy, or other psychotherapies are examined. The results indicate that subjects receiving RET demonstrated significant improvement over baseline measures and control groups. Effect-size was significantly related to therapist experience and to duration of the therapy, but there were no significant differences in effect-size between those studies that used psychotherapy clients compared to those using students as subjects. Those comparisons that were rated high in internal validity (random assignment, low attrition, and outcome measures low in reactivity), had significantly higher effect-sizes than medium validity studies. Outcome measures rated as low in reactivity (i.e., those measures which did not have an immediately discernable relationship with the treatments being assessed) had significantly higher effect-sizes than more reactive measures. Contrary to other reviews using the narrative review method, RET was found to be an effective form of therapy. This conclusion, however, was tempered by methodological flaws in the studies reviewed, such as lack of follow-up data and information regarding attrition rates.

References (31)

  • R.D. Zettle et al.

    Conceptual and empirical status of Rational-Emotive Therapy

    Progress in Behavior Modification

    (1980)
  • A. Bandura

    Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change

    Psychological Review

    (1977)
  • A.T. Beck

    The Beck depression inventory

    (1978)
  • J. Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1977)
  • R.A. DiGiuseppe et al.

    A review of outcome studies on Rational-Emotive Therapy

  • A.O. DiLorento

    Comparative psychotherapy

    (1971)
  • D.M. Dush et al.

    Self-statement modification with adults: A meta-analysis

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1983)
  • A. Ellis

    Outcome of employing three techniques of psychotherapy

    Journal of Clinical Psychology

    (1957)
  • A. Ellis

    Reason and emotion in psychotherapy

    (1962)
  • A. Ellis

    Overview of the clinical theory of Rational-Emotive Therapy

  • A. Ellis

    Comments on my critics

  • G.V. Glass

    Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research

    Educational Researcher

    (1976)
  • G.V. Glass

    Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research

    Review of Research in Education

    (1977)
  • G. Gregg

    The rational therapist: Epictetus, not Freud

    Psychology Today

    (1973)
  • D.A.F. Haaga et al.

    Outcome studies of rational-emotive therapy

  • Cited by (114)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    We thank Ms. Wendy A. Morris for her assistance in preparing this manuscript.

    ∗∗

    Larry C. Lyons, MA, is a Research Associate at the Hollins Communications Research Institute. Paul J. Woods, PhD, is a Professor of Psychology at Hollins College, a Licensed Psychologist in private practice, and a Fellow of the Institute for Rational-Emotive Therapy.

    View full text