Regular paper
Carrier-mediated transport system for choline and its related quaternary ammonium compounds on rat intestinal brush-border membrane

https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(92)90265-NGet rights and content

Abstract

The characteristics of the intestinal transport system for choline were investigated using isolated brush-border membrane vesicles from rat small intestine. In spite of the diminutive lipid solubility, the uptake of choline by membrane vesicles reflected smooth permeation into intravesicular space rather than the binding to the membrane surface. Physiological conditions, present in the intact intestine, such as an inward-directed Na+ or H+ gradient and inside negative membrane potentials, didn't directly involve in choline transport across the brush-border membrane. Moreover, an outward-directed H+ gradient had no significant effect on the time course of choline transport. However, in the absence of a driving-force, the initial uptake of choline exhibited a saturable manner. A kinetic analysis of the initial uptake rate gave an apparent Km of 159 μM. Furthermore, unlabeled choline caused both cis-inhibition and trans-stimulation for labeled choline transport, suggesting the existence of a carrier-mediated transport system for choline, classified as so-called ‘facilitated diffusion’. Since tetramethylammonium, acetylcholine, and N1-methylnicotinamide caused both cis-inhibition and trans-stimulation, they appear to be accepted as the substrate of choline carrier. On the other hand, quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) such as those which possessed hydrophobic parts in their molecules exhibited only cis-inhibition. They also inhibited Na+-dependent d-glucose transport, indicating that they influenced various carrier-mediated transport systems non-specifically due to interaction with the membrane. These findings strongly suggest that the choline transport system on the brush-border membrane of rat intestine recognizes only small molecular QACs as its substrate.

References (38)

  • G.R. Herzberg et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1973)
  • F.J. Kuczler et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1977)
  • E. Hegazy et al.

    J. Nutr.

    (1984)
  • P.G. Ruifrok et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1983)
  • C.L. Huang et al.

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1970)
  • M. Kessler et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1978)
  • O.H. Lowry et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1951)
  • M. Kessler et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1979)
  • V. Ganapathy et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1983)
  • H.M. Said et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1988)
  • W.R. Lieb et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1974)
  • A. Zachowski et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1988)
  • B. Elsenhans et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1985)
  • R. Deves et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1979)
  • S.H. Zeisel

    Annu. Rev. Nutr.

    (1981)
  • S.H. Zeisel et al.

    FASEB J.

    (1991)
  • J.W. Vetper et al.
  • W.G. Rohse et al.

    Am. J. Physiol.

    (1955)
  • H. Tsubaki et al.

    J. Pharmacobio-Dyn.

    (1987)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Choline and phosphatidylcholine

      2023, Encyclopedia of Human Nutrition: Volume 1-4, Fourth Edition
    • Stearoylcholine and oleoylcholine: Synthesis, physico-chemical characterization, nanoparticle formation, and toxicity studies

      2020, Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Their long-chain is flexible due to rotating their ester linkage easily. These compounds are hydrolyzed to choline and corresponding alkanoic acids, which are safe products [22–24]. The hydrolyze rate of long-chain choline esters is lower than the short ones [25].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text