Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Treatment of Sub-cellular Particles prior to Assay of the Enzymatic Marker, Succinic Dehydrogenase

Abstract

IT is very useful to be able to pin-point the activity of a tissue enzyme in a morphologically distinct sub-cellular unit, and this is frequently attempted by measuring the activity of the enzyme in fractions or sub-fractions obtained by centrifuging tissue homogenates. Succinic dehydrogenase is generally accepted and frequently used as an enzymatic marker for mitochondria in fractionation studies. It appears, however, that it is difficult to recover 100 per cent of the activity of succinic dehydrogenase of a homogenate after fractionation, particularly after centrifugation of particles in gradients of dense sucrose1–8, and the hopeful assumption has been made that the distribution of the recovered activity (ranging from 52 to 136 per cent) accurately reflects the true distribution (that is, that the errors or losses of activity are uniformly spread among the fractions). Experience has shown that this assumption can be far from the truth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blaschko, H., Hagen, J. M., and Hagen, P., J. Physiol., 139, 316 (1957).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Whittaker, V. P., Biochem. J., 72, 694 (1959).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Aldridge, W. N., and Johnson, M. K., Biochem. J., 73, 270 (1959).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, M. K., Biochem. J., 77, 610 (1960).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Singer, T. P., and Lusty, C. J., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 2, 276 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rose, S. P. R., Biochem. J., 83, 614 (1962).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. De Robertis, E., De Iraldi, A. P., Arnaiz, G. R. De L., and Salganicoff, L., J. Neurochem., 9, 23 (1962).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwartz, A. (personal communication).

  9. Gray, E. G., and Whittaker, V. P., J. Anat., 96, 79 (1962).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson, M. K., and Whittaker, V. P. (to be published).

  11. Green, D. E., Mii, S., and Kohout, P. M., J. Biol. Chem., 217, 551 (1955).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Singer, T. P., and Kearney, E. B., Methods Biochem. Anal., 4, 307 (1957).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

JOHNSON, M. Treatment of Sub-cellular Particles prior to Assay of the Enzymatic Marker, Succinic Dehydrogenase. Nature 196, 1210–1211 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/1961210a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1961210a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing