Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Re-examination of a Supposed Case of Specific Cell Adhesion

Abstract

SPECIFIC adhesion of sponge cells, such that only the cells of a single species will adhere together, has been claimed by many workers1–3. Indeed, the particular specific behaviour which has been reported3 for mixtures of cells from pairs taken from Haliclona occulata, Halichondria panicea, Microciona prolifera and Clione celata has been regarded as one of the most remarkable examples of specific adhesion or cell recognition, Sara4–6 has tested combinations of other species of marine sponge for specific adhesion without success. In all work on sponge cell aggregation, the recognition of the species type of the cells in the aggregates has depended on subjective observation of the colour of the aggregate. I find this criterion defective, for it is extremely easy to fail to observe a small proportion of cells of one colour and species type scattered in a mass of cells of a different colour and species type. Furthermore, only a proportion of the cells of highly coloured sponges may carry the pigment distinctive of a species, so that it is uncertain what happens to the unpigmented cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilson, H. V., J. Exp. Zool., 5, 245 (1907).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Galtsoff, P. S., Biol. Bull., 45, 153 (1923).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Humphreys, T., Devel. Biol., 8, 27 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sara, M., Boll. Zool., 33, 1067 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sara, M., Lian, L., and Melone, N., Nature, 210, 1167 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sara, M., Lian, L., and Melone, N., Nature, 210, 1168 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Curtis, A. S. G., Sym. Zool. Soc. Lond., 25, 335 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Curtis, A. S. G., and Hocking, L., Trans. Farad. Soc. (in the press).

  9. Curtis, A. S. G., J. Embryol. Exp. Morph., 23, 253 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Curtis, A. S. G., J. Embryol. Exp. Morph., 22, 305 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Swift, D. L., and Friedlander, S. K., J. Colloid Sci., 19, 621 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G., Statistical Methods (Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, 1967).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Roth, S., Devel. Biol., 18, 602 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CURTIS, A. Re-examination of a Supposed Case of Specific Cell Adhesion. Nature 226, 260–261 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/226260a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/226260a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing