Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Leaf Resistance in Succulent Plants

Abstract

REPORTS in the literature indicate or suggest that the stomata of succulent plants open in the dark and close in the light. This conclusion is based on direct observations1, measurements of diffusion with a porometer2, and inference3. Nishida2 reported nocturnal stomatal opening in several succulent species, but diurnal opening in others. Thick leaves, few stomata, and small stomatal openings make measurements of the stomatal aperture and subsequent determinations of leaf resistance difficult. The innovation of a resistance hygrometer by Wallihan4 and van Bavel et al.5 allowed the precise determination of leaf resistance to water vapour transfer in succulent plants without the complications frequently encountered with other methods. Measurements of leaf resistance are based on changes in the resistance of a lithium chloride relative humidity sensor as water vapour diffuses from the leaf to the sensor. The sensor is calibrated with standard length tubes placed over a free water surface; thus the leaf resistance can be estimated in meaningful physical units (sec/cm)5. In this communication, we present data indicating the magnitude of leaf resistance to water vapour transfer in Kalanchoe blossfeldiana v. Poelln. in the light and dark. K. blossfeldiana was chosen because many investigators have used it as an experimental plant for dark carbon dioxide fixation studies6,7.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shreve, E. B., Physiol. Res., 2, 73 (1916).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nishida, K., Physiol. Plant., 16, 281 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Joshi, M. C., Boyer, J. S., and Kramer, P. J., Bot. Gaz., 126, 174 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wallihan, E. F., Plant Physiol., 39, 86 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. van Bavel, C. H. M., Nakayama, F. S., and Ehrler, W. L., Plant Physiol., 40, 535 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Krotkov, G., Runeckles, V. C., and Thimann, K. V., Plant Physiol., 33, 289 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gregory, F. G., Spear, I., and Thimann, K. V., Plant Physiol., 29, 220 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwabe, W. W., Nature, 169, 1053 (1952).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ting, I. P., and Loomis, W. E., Plant Physiol., 40, 220 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, R., and Gates, D. M., Amer. J. Bot., 51, 963 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

TING, I., DEAN, M. & DUGGER, W. Leaf Resistance in Succulent Plants. Nature 213, 526–527 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/213526a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/213526a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing