Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Improved Test Cell Material for the Tetrahedral Anvil Apparatus

Abstract

TEST cells for ultra-high-pressure apparatus of the ‘belt’ or ‘anvil’ types1 are typically made from pyrophyllite, a naturally occurring aluminium silicate. It is unlikely, however, that this material possesses an ideal combination of mechanical properties for this purpose, a view which is supported by the shape of the load/pressure calibration curve. Fig. 1 (curve A) shows this experimental relation for a 0.75-in. edge National Bureau of Standards type tetrahedral anvil apparatus using pyrophyllite tetrahedra. The usual resistance transitions in bismuth at 25.4 kbars (ref. 2), thallium at 36.7 kbars (ref. 2), and barium at 59 kbars (ref. 3) were used, with the specimen geometry shown. It will be noted that although at 25.4 kbars loads close to the nominal pressure (that is, load/anvil area) line B are obtained, at higher pressure there is a more or less linear fall-off towards high loads, the efficiency of pressure generation falling away rapidly. No explanation of this has as yet been published, but two likely hypotheses may be put forward: either (a) it is due to the load on the compressible gaskets, or (b) it is due to stress difference in the pyrophyllite (which can be high at high pressures)1, since the maximum principal stress would be expected to be normal to the anvil face in the pyrophyllite just below the surface. Experiments have been made with specially profiled and lubricated anvils4: these indicate that gasket loads are probably not significant throughout the pressure range, so that (b) is the more likely hypothesis. Since this involves a fundamental mechanical property, an alternative test cell material was sought with a different relation between shear strength and compressibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. In Modern Very High Pressure Techniques, edit. by Wentorf, R. H., 1 (Butterworths, London, 1962).

  2. Kennedy, G. C., and Lamori, P. N., J. Geophys. Res., 67, 851 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kennedy, G. C., see High Pressure Measurement, edit. by Giardini, A. A., and Lloyd, E. C., 386 (Butterworths, Washington, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  4. To be published.

  5. In Modern Very High Pressure Techniques, edit. by Wentorf, R. H., 229 (Butterworths, London, 1962).

  6. In High Pressure Measurement, edit. by Giardini, A. A., and Lloyd, E, C., 315 (Butterworths, Washington, 1963).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ASHCROFT, K., GOODMAN, C. & LEES, J. Improved Test Cell Material for the Tetrahedral Anvil Apparatus. Nature 205, 685–686 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1038/205685a0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/205685a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing