Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Analysis of Spray-drop Data

Abstract

THE spray-drop method of Williams and Backus1,2 is a valuable technique in electron microscopy for the estimation of virus concentrations. A statistical analysis was described in the original papers3. In 1958 we showed4 that this analysis was valid and gave a test to check that in any estimation the pairs of numbers used were unlikely to contain variations due to causes other than purely random ones. We pointed out that the ratio between the number of virus (Vi) and the number of latex (Li) in the ith drop can be expected to vary between one drop and the next for two reasons. There is the variation due to random movements of the particles, both virus and latex, in suspensions at ordinary temperatures which introduces an uncertainty into whether a particle is in or not in a drop at the instant of formation. This introduces a variation in the numbers of particles expected in drops of the same size from a uniformly mixed suspension. It will have a Poisson distribution and has been termed by us inherent variation. The second reason is due to experimental factors—inadequate mixing, contamination during spraying, aggregation of particles, etc., and these have been termed induced variations. Our test shows whether the pairs of numbers obtained from a series of drops contain variations in excess of that which would be expected from the inherent variation alone. This test does not make any assumption about drop size and may be applied to a collection of droplets of any size distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams, R. C., and Backus, R. C., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 71, 4052 (1949).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Backus, R. C., and Williams, R. C., J. App. phys., 21, 11 (1950).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Luria, S. E., Williams, R. C., and Backus, R. C., J. Bact., 61, 179 (1951).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Williamson, K. I., and Taylor, W. B., Brit. J. App. Phys., 9, 264 (1958).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Opfell, J. B., Nature, 186, 822 (1960).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Watson, D. H., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 61, 321 (1962).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bresse, jun., S. S., and Trautman, R., Virology, 10, 57 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crocker, T. T., and Bennett, B. M., J. Immunol., 69, 183 (1952).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WILLIAMSON, K., TAYLOR, W. Analysis of Spray-drop Data. Nature 200, 813–814 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/200813a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/200813a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing