Skip to main content
Log in

Histamine uptake and metabolism in intact isolated parietal cells

  • Histamine and Kinins
  • Published:
Agents and Actions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

3H-Histamine binding, uptake and metabolism were investigated in intact isolated and enriched parietal cells from the dog and guinea pig. Histamine uptake was sodium dependent and followed by intracellular metabolism. The only metabolite that was detected and extracted from cytosol has been identified by TLC to beN r-methylhistamine. The histamineN-methyltransferase activity appeared to be sodium dependent and was inhibited by mepyramine and chlorpromazine, and also by higher concentrations (10−4–10−3 mol/l) of cimetidine. Two blockers of the sodium channel, amiloride and aminoguanidine, also reduced the enzyme activity by an as yet unknown mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Berglindh andG. Sachs,Histamine Uptake and Release from Isolated Gastric Glands, in:Hormone Receptors in Digestion and Nutrition (Eds. G. Rosselin, P. Fromageot and S. Bonfils; 1979), pp. 373–381.

  2. A.H. Soll,The Actions of Secretagogues on Oxygen Uptake by Isolated Mammalian Parietal Cells, J. Clin. Invest.61, 370–380 (1978).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Albinus,Histamine Binding to Isolated Gastric Mucosal Cells from Guinea Pig and Dog, Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. Suppl. 311, 210 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Schippert, K.-A. Kovar andK.-Fr. Sewing,Determination of Histamine and its Metabolic Products in the Pig Gastric Mucosa, Pharmacology19, 86–95 (1979).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. D.P. Jewell, V.N. Katiyar, C. Rees, K.B. Taylor andJ.P. Wright,Isolation of Parietal Cells from Guinea Pig Gastric Mucosa and the Immunological Characterization of the Antigenic Structure, Gut16, 603–612 (1975).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Barth andW. Lorenz,Structural Requirements of Imidazole Compounds to be Inhibitors or Activators of Histamine Methyltransferase: Investigations of Histamine Analogues and H 2 -Receptor Antagonists, Agents and Actions8(4), 359–365 (1978).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Barth, I. Niemeyer, andW. Lorenz,Studies on the Mode of Action of Histamine H 1 - and H 2 -Receptor Antagonists on Gastric Histamine Methyltransferase, Agents and Actions3(3), 138–147 (1973).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O.H. Lowry, N.J. Rosebrough, A.L. Farr, andR.J. Randall,Protein Measurement with the Folin Phenol Reagent, J. Biol. Chem.193, 265–275 (1951).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. W. Lorenz, H. Barth andE. Werle,Histamine and Histamine Methyltransferase in Gastric Mucosa of Man, Pig, Dog and Cow, Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak.267, 421 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  10. K.M. Lindahl,The Histamine Methylating Enzyme System in Liver, Acta physiol. scand.49, 114–138 (1960).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Albinus, M., Sewing, K.F. Histamine uptake and metabolism in intact isolated parietal cells. Agents and Actions 11, 223–227 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01967618

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01967618

Keywords

Navigation