Skip to main content
Log in

The optimization test in the guinea-pig. A method for the predictive evaluation of the contact allergenicity of chemicals

  • Models in Toxicology
  • Research Report
  • Published:
Agents and Actions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Guinea-pigs were sensitized with various substances (DNCB, penicillin G, PPL, ethylaminobenzoate, formalin) by the Draize method, the maximization method and the new optimization method (intracutaneous test employing adjuvant). The advantages of the optimization method favouring its adoption as a standard sensitization test are discussed in the light of the results obtained by this method and with the two established tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.L. Baer, D.L. Ramsey andE. Biondi,The Most Common Contact Allergens 1968–1970, Arch. Dermatol.108, 74–78 (1973).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. E.V. Bühler,Delayed Contact Hypersensitivity in the Guinea Pig, Arch. Dermatol.91, 171–177 (1965).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. J.H. Draize,Intracutaneous Sensitization Test on Guinea Pigs, in: Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics, Association of Food and Drug Officials of the United States (Austin, Texas 1959).

  4. R.W. Ferraresi, C.T. Dedrick, S. Raffel andM. Goihman-Yahr,Studies of the Makrophage Inhibition Test 1. Comparison of the Skin and Cell Migration Reactions during the Course of Development of Delayed Hypersensitivity, J. Immun.102 (4), 852–858 (1969).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Th. Maurer, P. Thomann, E.G. Weirich andR. Hess, in preparation (1975).

  6. A.M. Kligman,The Identification of Contact Allergens by Human Assay. III. The Maximization Test: A Procedure for Screening and Rating Contact Sensitizers, J. invest. Dermatol.47, 393–409 (1966).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Magnusson andA.M. Kligman,The Identification of Contact Allergens by Animal Assay. The Guinea Pig Maximization Test, J. invest. Dermatol.52, 268–276 (1969).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Magnusson andA.M. Kligman,Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Guinea Pig (Thomas, Springfield, Illinois 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. North American Contact Dermatitis Group,Epidemiology of Contact Dermatitis in North America: 1972, Arch. Dermatol.108, 537–540 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Schöpf, Erfahrungen mit dem Lymphozytentransformationstest bei der Diagnostik von Allergien des humoralen und zellulären Typs, Z. Haut-u. Geschl-Krankh.46 (2), 21–40 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. Simon, A. Dobozy andJ. Hunyadi,Einige in vitro Methoden zur Untersuchung der Arzneimittelallergie und deren diagnostischer Wert, Z. Haut- u. GeschlKrankh.46, 713–718 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Sochor,Zu Untersuchungsmethoden zum Nachweis einer Allergie vom verzögerten Typ am Beispiel des experimentellen Kontaktekzems, Derm. Mschr.159, 16–25 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maurer, T., Thomann, P., Weirich, E.G. et al. The optimization test in the guinea-pig. A method for the predictive evaluation of the contact allergenicity of chemicals. Agents and Actions 5, 174–179 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02027360

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02027360

Keywords

Navigation