Abstract
The effects of metiamide and of four H1 receptor blocking agents (mepyramine, promethazine, clemastine and ketotifene) on anaphylactic reaction were studied in the guinea-pig. The H1 blockers conferred partial protection which shows that with the experimental protocol utilized (challenge injection with high doses of antigen), histamine plays a lesser role than other mediators released or synthesized. Metiamide (30.0 mg/kg i.v.) noticeably enhanced the increase in pulmonary resistance observed during anaphylactic reaction and reduced the protective effect of the H1 antagonists on this parameter and on histamine release. These effects might be explained by an inhibition — at least partial — of the negative feed-back mechanism through which histamine controls its own release, or by a specific action of metiamide in high doses. The transient tachycardia initially observed in anaphylactic shock is partly related to stimulation of cardiac H2 receptors by the histamine released, since it is suppressed by metiamide.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H.R. Bourne, K.L. Melmon andL.M. Lichtenstein,Histamine Augments Leukocyte Cyclic AMP and Blocks Antigenic Histamine Release, Science173, 743–745 (1971).
L.M. Lichtenstein andE. Gillespie,Inhibition of Histamine Release by Histamine is Controlled by an H 2 Receptor, Nature (Lond.)244, 287–288 (1973).
N. Capurro andR. Levi,Anaphylaxis in the Guinea-Pig Isolated Heart: Selective Inhibition by Burimamide of the Positive Inotropic and Chronotropic Effects of Released Histamine, Br. J. Pharmacol.48, 620–628 (1973).
P.N. Aarsen andA. Zeegers,Effects of Histamine, 5-Hydroxytryptamine and Bradykinin in the Vascular System of Isolated Lungs in the Guinea-Pig and the Influence of Phenylbutazone on these Effects, Br. J. Pharmacol.45, 284–298 (1972).
P. Goadby andE.A. Phillips,Some Effects of Burimamide on the Isolated Perfused Pulmonary Circulation of the Guinea-Pig, Br. J. Pharmacol.49, 368–369 (1973).
P. Goadby andM. Ann Little,The Action of Metiamide in Anaphylaxis in vivo in the Guinea-Pig, Br. J. Pharmacol.58, 303P-304P (1976).
J.M. Drazen, C.S. Venugopalan andN.A. Soter,H 2 Receptor Mediated Inhibition of Immediate Type Hypersensitivity Reactions in vivo, Am. Rev. Resp. Dis.117, 479–484 (1978).
R.W. Brimblecombe andW.A.M. Duncan,The Relevance to Man of Preclinical Data for Cimetidine, in:Cimetidine Proceedings of the Second International Symposium of Histamine H 2 Receptor Antagonists (Eds. W.L. Burland and M. Alison Simkins; Excerpta Medica, 1977), pp. 54–65.
W.W. Douglas,Histamine and Antihistamines, in:The Phamacological Basis of Therapeutics, 4th Edn. (Eds. L.S. Goodman and A. Gilman; The Macmillan Co. New York, 1970), pp. 620–662.
C. Advenier, J.R. Boissier, S. Ho, B. Mallard andF. Ruff,The Influence of Pentobarbital and Urethane Anaesthesia on Bronchomotricity in the Guinea-Pig, Br. J. Pharmacol.64, 519–525 (1978).
M.O. Amdur andJ. Mead,Mechanics of Respiration in Unanaesthetized Guinea-Pigs, Am. J. Physiol.129, 364–368 (1958).
P.A. Shore, A. Burkhalter andV.M. Cohn,A Method for the Fluorometric Assay of Histamine in Tissues, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.127, 182–186 (1959).
F. Ruff, A. Saindelle, E. Dutripon andJ.-L. Parrot,Continous Automatic Fluorometric Evaluation of Total Blood Histamine, Nature (Lond.)214, 279–281 (1967).
F. Hahn,Pharmacological Actions of Antihistaminics. Section B: Antianaphylactics and Antiallergic Effects, in:Handbuch der experimentellen pharmakologie, XVIII/2, Histamine II and Antihistaminics (Ed. M. Rocha e Silva; Springer Verlag, 1978), pp. 439–504.
S.M. Feinberg, S. Malkiel, T.B. Bernstein andB.J. Hargis,Histamine Antagonists. XV: Comparative Experimental Studies of Certain Antihistaminic Compounds. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.99, 195–201 (1950).
J. Alberty,Versuche über den Anteil von Histamin am anaphylaktischen Asthma sowie Beobachtungen über Auslösung und Verhalten der Asthma — und Kreislaufsymptome anaphylaktischer Schockfragmente des Meerschweinchens, Int. Arch. Allergy14, 162–204 (1959).
M.O.J. Collier andG.W.L. James,Humoral Factors Affecting Pulmonary Inflation During Acute Anaphylaxis in the Guinea-Pig in vivo, Br. J. Pharmacol.30, 283–301 (1967).
J. Freund,The Effect of Paraffin Oil and Mycobacteria on Antibody Formation and Sensibilisation, Am. J. Clin. Pathol.21, 645–656 (1951).
I. Green, B. Benacerraf andS.H. Stone,The Effects of Amount of Mycobacterial Adjuvants on the Immune Response of Strain 2, Strain 13 and Hartley Strain Guinea-Pigs to DNP-PLL and DNP-GL, J. Immunol.103, 403–412 (1969).
J.K. Spitznagel andA.C. Allison,Mode of Action of Adjuvants: Retinol and Other Lysosome-Labilizing Agents as Adjuvants, J. Immunol.104, 119–127 (1970).
D.T. Okpako,The Effect of Graded Doses of Antigen on Bronchoconstrictor and Mediator-Release Responses in the Anaphylaxis of the Isolated Perfused Guinea-Pig Lung, Int. Arch. Allergy40, 620–630 (1971).
P.D. Joiner, M. Wall, L.B. Davis andF. Hahn,Role of Amines in Anaphylactic Contraction of Guinea-Pig Isolated Smooth Muscle, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.53, 261–270 (1974).
W.E. Brocklehurst,The Release of Histamine and Formation of a Slow-Reacting Substance (SRS A) During Anaphylactic Shock, J. Physiol. (Lond.)151, 416–435 (1960).
P.A. Berry andH.O.J. Collier,Bronchoconstrictor Action and Antagonism of a Slow-Reacting Substance from Anaphylaxis of Isolated Guinea-Pig Lung, Br. J. Pharmacol.23, 201–216 (1964).
P.J. Piper andJ.R. Vane,The Release of Additional Factors in Anaphylaxis and its Antagonism by Antiinflammatory Drugs, Nature (Lond.)223, 29–35 (1969).
A.B. Kay, D.J. Stechschulte andK.F. Austen,An Eosinophil Leukocyte Chemotactic Factor of Anaphylaxis, J. Exp. Med.133, 602–609 (1971).
J.-L. Parrot, F. Dray, G. Allouche, M.C. Santais, C. Foussard, F. Dubois andF. Ruff,Etude de la synthèse des prostaglandines au cours du choc anaphylactique chez le Cobaye, C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris282, série D, 1289–1292 (1976).
J.M. Drazen andK.F. Austen,Effects of Intravenous Administration of Slow-Reacting Substance of Anaphylaxis, Histamine, Bradykinin and Prostaglandin F 2α on Pulmonary Mechanics in the Guinea-Pig, J. Clin. Invest.53, 1679–1685 (1974).
J.M. Drazen andK.F. Austen,Pulmonary Response to Antigen Infusion in the Sensitized Guinea-Pig: Modification by Atropine, J. Appl. Physiol.39, 916–919 (1975).
S.B. Flynn, andD.A.A. Owen,Histamine Receptors in Peripheral Vascular Beds in the Cat, Br. J. Pharmacol.55, 181–188 (1975).
R. Marks andN.W. Greaves,Vascular Reaction to Histamine and Compound 48/80 in Human Skin: Suppression by a Histamine H 2 Receptor Blocking Agent, Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.4, 367–369 (1977).
I. Mota andW. Dias da Silva,The Antianaphylactic and Histamine Releasing Properties of the Antihistamines. Their Effect on the Mast Cells, Br. J. Pharmacol.15, 396–404 (1960).
L.M. Lichtenstein andE. Gillespie,The Effects of the H 1 and H 2 Antihistamines on ‘Allergic’ Histamine Release and its Inhibition by Histamine, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.192, 441–449 (1975).
U. Martin andD. Romer,The Pharmacological Properties of a New, Orally Active, Antianaphylactic Compound: Ketotifen, a Benzocycloheptathiophene, Arzneimittel Forsch.28, 770–782 (1978).
M. Kaliner,Human Lung Tissue and Anaphylaxis: the Effects of Histamine on the Immunological Release of Mediators, Am. Rev. Resp. Dis.118, 1015–1022 (1978).
R. Fantozzi, F. Franconi, P.F. Mannaioni, E. Masini andF. Moroni,Interactions of Histamine H 1 and H 2 Receptor Antagonists with Histamine Uptake and Metabolism by Guinea-Pig Isolated Atrium and Mouse Neoplastic Mast Cells in vitro. Br. J. Pharmacol.53, 569–574 (1975).
J.W. Black, W.A.M. Duncan, G.J. Durant, C.R. Ganellin andM.E. Parsons,Definition and Antagonism of Histamine H 2 Receptors, Nature (Lond.)236, 385–390 (1972).
R. Levi, N. Capurro andC.M. Lee,Pharmacological Characterization of Cardiac Histamine Receptors: Sensitivity to H 1 and H 2 Receptor Agonists and Antagonists, European J. Pharmacol.30, 328–335 (1975).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Advenier, C., Mallard, B., Santais, M.C. et al. The effects of metiamide and H1 receptor blocking agents on anaphylactic response in guinea-pigs. Agents and Actions 9, 467–473 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01968112
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01968112