Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the Effect on Heart Rate Variability of Some Agents Acting at the β-Adrenoceptor using Nonlinear Scatterplot and Sequence Methods

  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is evidence that the processes regulating heart rate variability (HRV) reflect nonlinear complexity and show “chaotic” determinism. Data analyses using nonlinear methods may therefore reveal patterns not apparent with the standard methods for HRV analysis. We have consequently used two nonlinear methods, the Poincaré plot (scatterplot) and cardiac sequence (quadrant) analysis, in addition to the standard time-domain summary statistics, during a normal volunteer investigation of the effects on HRV of some agents acting at the cardiac beta-adrenoceptor. Under double-blind and randomized conditions (Latin square design), 25 normal volunteers received placebo, salbutamol 8 mg (β2-adrenoceptor partial agonist), pindolol 10 mg (β2-adrenoceptor partial agonist), or atenolol 50 mg (β1-adrenoceptor antagonist). Single oral doses of medication (at weekly intervals) were administered at 22:30 hours, with sleeping heart rates recorded overnight. The long-term (SDNN, SDANN) and short-term (rMSSD) time-domain summary statistics were reduced by salbutamol 8 mg and increased by atenolol 50 mg compared with placebo. The reductions in both SDNN and SDANN were greater after salbutamol 8 mg compared with pindolol 10 mg. The reduced HRV after pindolol 10 mg differed from the increased HRV following atenolol 50 mg. The Poincaré plot, constructed by plotting each RR interval against the preceding RR interval, was measured using a reproducible computerized method. Scatterplot length and area were reduced by salbutamol 8 mg and increased by atenolol 50 mg compared with placebo; scatterplot length and area were lower after pindolol 10 mg compared with atenolol 50 mg. Geometric analysis of the scatterplots allowed width assessment (i.e., dispersion) at fixed RR intervals. At the higher percentiles (i.e., 90% of scatterplot length: low HR), salbutamol 8 mg reduced and atenolol 50 mg increased dispersion; at lower percentiles (i.e., 10%, 25%, and 50% length), atenolol 50 mg and pindolol 10 mg increased dispersion compared with placebo and salbutamol 8 mg. Cardiac sequence analysis (differences between three adjacent beats; ΔRR vs. ΔRRn+1) was used to assess the short-term patterns of cardiac acceleration and deceleration. Four patterns were identified: +/+ (a lengthening sequencing), +/− or −/+ (balanced sequences), and finally −/− (a shortening sequence). Cardiac acceleration episodes (i.e., number of times ΔRR and ΔRRn+1 were both changed) were increased in quadrants −/− and +/+ following pindolol 10 mg and salbutamol 8 mg; the beat-to-beat difference (ΔRRn+1) was reduced after salbutamol 8 mg compared with the three other groups. These results demonstrated a shift towards sympathetic dominance (β-adrenoceptor partial agonist salbutamol 8 mg) or parasympathetic dominance (β1-adrenoceptor antagonist atenolol 50 mg); pindolol 10 mg exhibited HR-dependent effects, reducing HRV at low but increasing variability at high prevailing heart rates. These nonlinear methods appear to be valuable tools to investigate HRV in health and to study the implications of perturbation of HRV with drug therapy in disease states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kleiger RE, Miller JP, Bigger JT, Moss AJ. The Multicenter Post-Infarction Research Group. Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1987;59:256-262.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Malik M, Farrell T, Cripps T, Camm AJ. Heart rate variability in relation to prognosis after myocardial infarction: Selection of optimal processing techniques. Eur Heart J 1989;10:1060-1074.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bigger JT, Fleiss JL, Steinman R, Rolnitzky LM, Kleiger RE, Rottman JN. Frequency domain measures of heart period variability and mortality after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1992;85:164-171.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lown B, Verrier RL. Neural activity and ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med 1976;294:1165-1170.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Spiers JP, Silke B, McDermott U, Shanks RG, Harron DWG. Time and frequency domain assessment of heart rate variability: A theoretical and clinical appreciation. Clin Autonom Res 1993;3:145-158.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Norwegian Multicentre Study Group. Timolol-induced reduction in mortality and reinfarction in patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1981;304:801-807.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beta-blocker Heart attack Research Group. A randomised trial of propranolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 1982;247:1707-1714.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Molgaard H, Mickley H, Pless P, Bjerregaard P, Moller M. Effects of metoprolol on heart rate variability in survivors of acute myocardiol infarction. Am J Cardiol 1993;71: 1357-1359.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sandrone G, Mortara A, Torzillo D, La Rovere MT, Malliani A, Lombardi F. Effects of beta blockers (atenolol or metoprolol) on heart rate variability after acute myocardial infaction. Am J Cardiol 1994;74:340-345.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Silke B, Riddell JG. Effects of beta-adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists on heart-rate variability assessed using summary statistics andnonlinear procedures. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1997;30:817-823.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lipworth BJ, Grove A. Partial beta-adrenoceptor agonists revisited. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997;43:9-14.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Camm J, Malik M. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Report of Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J 1996;17:354-381.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raetz SL, Richard CA, Garfinkel A, Harper RM. Dynamic characteristics of cardiac R-R intervals during sleep and waking states. Sleep 1991;14:526-533.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schechtman VL, Raetz SL, Harper RK, Garfinkel A, Wilson AJ, Southall DP. Dynamic analysis of cardiac R-R intervals in normal infants and in infants who subsequently succumbed to the sudden infant death syndrome. Paed Res 1992;31:606-612.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hagerman I, Berglund M, Lorin M, Nowak J, Sylven C. Chaos-related deterministic regulation of heart rate variability in time-and frequency domains: Effects of autonomic blockade and exercise. Cardiovasc Res 1996;31:410-418.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hnatkova K, Copie X, Staunton A, Malik M. Numeric processing of Lorenz plots of R-R intervals from long-term ECG's-comparison with time-domain measures of heart rate variability for risk stratification after myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiogr 1995;28:74-80.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Copie X, Leheuzey JY, Iliow MC, Khouri R, Lavergne T, Pousset F, Guize L. Correlation between time-domain measures of heart rate variability and scatterplots in post-infarction patients. PACE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996;19:342-347.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kamen PW, Krum H, Tonkin AM. Poincare plot of heart rate variability allows quantitative display of parasympathetic nervous activity in humans. Clin Sci 1996;91:201-208.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lipworth BJ, Brown RA, McDevitt DG. Assessment of airways, tremor and chronotropic responses to inhaled salbutamol in the quantification of beta2-adrenoceptor blockade. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1989;28:95-102.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lipworth BJ, Irvine NA, McDevitt DG. The effects of time and dose on the relative beta-1 and beta-2 adrenoceptor antagonism of betaxolol and atenolol. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1991;31:154-159.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wagner J, Reinhardt D, Schumann HJ. Comparison of the bronchodilator and cardiovascular actions of isoprenaline, Th 1165a, terbutaline and salbutamol in cats and isolated organ preparations. Res Exp Med 1973;162:49-62.

    Google Scholar 

  22. O'Donnell SR. An examination of some beta-adrenoceptor stimulants for selectivity using the isolated trachea and atria of the guinea pig. Eur J Pharmacol 1972;19:371-379.

  23. Waite R. Activite sympathomimetique intrinseque des betabloquants. Nouvelle Press Medicale 1978;7:2707-2709.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Clark BJ, Menninger K, Bertholet A. Pindolol: The pharmacology of a partial agonist. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1982;13: 149S-158S.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McCaffrey PM, Riddell JG, Shanks RG. An assessment of the partial agonist activity of Ro 31,1118, flusoxolol and pindolol in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1987;24:571-580.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Malik M, Cripps T, Farrell T, Camm AJ. Prognostic value of heart rate variability after myocardial infarction. A comparison of different data processing methods. Med Biol Eng Comput 1989;27:603-611.

    Google Scholar 

  27. SPSS I. SPSS forWindows Users Guide. Chicago, IL 60611: Norusis / SPSS Inc., 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pousset F, Copie X, LeChat P, et al. Effects of bisoprolol on heart-rate variability in heart-failure. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:612-617.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Altman DG. Two way analysis of variance. In: Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1992:334-336.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cook JR, Bigger JT, Kleiger RE, Fleiss JL, Steinman RC, Rolnitzky LM. Effect of atenolol and diltiazem on heart rate variability in normal persons. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17:480-484.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schweizer MW, Brachmann J, Kirchner U, Walter Sack I, Dickhaus H, Metze C, Kubler W. Heart rate variability in time and frequency domains: Effects of gallopamil, nifedipine, and metoprolol compared with placebo. Br Heart J 1993;70:252-258.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hughson RL, Yamamoto Y, McCullough RE, Sutton JR, Reeves JT. Sympathetic and parasympathetic indicators of heart rate control at altitude studied by spectral analysis. J Appl Physiol 1994;77:2537-2542.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Niemela MJ, Airaksinen KE, Huikuri HV. Effect of beta-blockade on heart rate variability in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:1370-1377.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hohnloser SH, Klingenheben T, Zabel M, Just H. Effect of sotalol on heart rate variability assessed by Holter monitoring in patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:67A-71A.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stein PK, Rottman JN, Bosner MS, Conger BM, Kleiger RE. Effects of pindolol and labetalol on heart rate variability in normal subjects. Ambul Monit 1995;8:171-178.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brouwer J, Viersma JW, Vanveldhuisen DJ, et al. Usefulness of heart-rate variability in predicting drug efficacy (metoprolol vs. diltiazem) in patients with stable angina. Am J Cardiol 1995;76(11):759-763.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Keeley EC, Lange RA, Hillis LD, Joglar JA, Page RL. Correlation between time-domain measures of heart rate variability and scatterplots in patients with healed myocardial infarcts and the influence of metoprolol. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:412-414.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Myers GA, Martin GJ, Magid NM, et al. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability in sudden cardiac death: Comparison to other methods. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1986;33:1149-1156.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Scherer P, Ohler JP, Hopp HW, Hirche H. Decomposition of the time domain parameter SDNN of heart rate variability. Ambul Monit 1994;7:7-18.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Brouwer J, van Veldhuisen DJ, Man in 't Veld AJ, et al. Prognostic value of heart rate variability during long-term follow-up in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. The Dutch Ibopamine Multicentre Trial Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:1183-1189.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Grove A, McFarlane LC, Lipworth BJ. Expression of the beta-2 partial agonist/antagonist activity of salbutamol in states of low and high adrenergic tone. Thorax 1995;50: 134-138.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hall JA, Petch MC, Brown MJ. Intracoronary injections of salbutamol demonstrate the presence of functional beta-2 adrenoceptors in the human heart. Circ Res 1989;65: 546-553.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lipworth BJ, Brown RA, McDevitt DJ. Assessment of airways, tremor, and chronotropic responses to inhaled salbutamol in the quantification of beta-2 adrenoceptor blockade. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1989;28:95-102.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jartti T, Kaila T, Tahvanainen K, Kuusela T, Vanto T, Valimaki I. The acute effects of inhaled salbutamol on the beatto-beat variability of heart rate and blood pressure assessed by spectral analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997;43: 421-428.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silke, B., Riddell, J. Evaluation of the Effect on Heart Rate Variability of Some Agents Acting at the β-Adrenoceptor using Nonlinear Scatterplot and Sequence Methods. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 12, 439–448 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007793730393

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007793730393

Navigation