Abstract
Corner wall and tunnel testing of foamed thermosetting plastics has suggested that the E-84 anomaly can be resolved by the use of a rate index in the range of 0 to 77.5, where a distance criterion currently prevails. Inherent inaccuracies, however, might continue to require occasional corner wall testing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Williamson, R. B. and Baron, F. M., “A Corner Fire Test to Simulate Residential Fires,”Journal of Fire and Flammability, Vol. 4 (April 1973), p. 99.
McGuire, J. H., “The Spread of Fire in Corridors,”Fire Technology, Vol. 4, No. 2 (May 1968), p. 103.
Parker, W. J. and Lee, B. T., “Fire Buildup in Reduced Size Enclosures,” National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 411 (November 1974), p. 139.
Thomas, P. H., Webster, C. T., and Raftery, M. M., “Some Experiments on Buoyant Diffusion Flames,”Combustion and Flame, Vol. 5, No. 4 (December 1961), p. 359.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Note: The test method designated E-84 by the American Society for Testing and Materials is also known as NFPA 255 and UL 723.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
D'Souza, M.V., McGuire, J.H. ASTM E-84 and the flammability of foamed thermosetting plastics. Fire Technol 13, 85–94 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303053
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303053