Skip to main content
Log in

Robot metrology using two kinds of measurement equipment

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of using two measurement devices: the WATSMART system and the WILDCAT theodolite system for robot metrology. The former device is less expensive, and runs automatically. The theodolite system has a better resolution but is more expensive, and runs manually. The objective was to determine the agreement in their measurement accuracy, variation, and the resulting best performance condition for the robot (i.e. optimal factor–level combination) between the two kinds of measurement equipment. The idea was that even if the accuracy and variation of the equipment differed, if the practical aspects (i.e. measurement performance and the purpose of measurement) were acceptable, the less expensive equipment would provide cost and automation benefits. The experiment was conducted on a PRO-ARM RS-2200, five axis, open loop, joint-coordinate type, educational robot. A Taguchi L27 orthogonal array was selected for the experimentation. Seven controllable factors (load, speed, distance moved, orientation of the robot arm, direction of travel, height of travel, and the starting point), along with three interactions, were studied. The accuracy of the robot and the best factor–level combination (FLC) were computed for each set of observations. The mean, standard deviation and maximum values for the two pieces of equipment were also computed. Based on this, the agreement between the two equipment was deduced. Although some similarity existed, the results were not good enough to convince the authors that the two measurement systems were equally effective. Recommendations are made for the appropriate situations for using each of the measurement devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerson, D. S. and Harry, D. R. (1985) Theory, experimental results, and recommended standards regarding the static positioning and orienting precision of industrial robots. Robotics & Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2(3/4), 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerson, D. S. (1987) Uses of the WILD C.A.T. 2000 Electronic Theodolite System with Robot-Based Manufacturing Systems, Ackerson & Associates, Inc., West Chester, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1984) Robot Assessment Program, Robotics and Automation Applications Consulting Center, Dearborn, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1986) Fourth Symposium of Taguchi Methods, Center for Taguchi Methods, American Supplier Institute, Inc., Dearborn, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1987a) WATSMART Product/Technical Description, Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1987b) Draft of American National Standard for Industrial Robots-Performance Evaluation, Robotic Industries Association, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1987c) Robot Accuracy Study Conducted for NBS-Overview, Vol. 1, Ackerson & Associates, Inc., West Chester, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asada, H. and Slotine, J.-J. E. (1986) Robot Analysis and Control, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. T. (1983) Cellular manufacturing systems reduce setup time. Industrial Engineering, 15, 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. B. (1985) A random-path laser interferometer system, in Proceedings of International Congress on Applications of Lasers and Electro-Optics, San Francisco, CA.

  • Craig, J. J. (1986) Introduction to Robotics, Mechanics and Control, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAO

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutkosky, M. R., Fussell, P. S. and Milligan, R. Jr (1984a), Precision flexible machining cells within a manufacturing system, Technical Report, CMU-RI-TR-84-12, Robotics Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutkosky, M. R., Fussell, P. S. and Milligan, R. Jr (1984b), The design of a flexible machining cell for small batch production. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 3(1), 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C. P. (1987) Robot accuracy issues and methods of improvement, in Proceedings of Robots 11 and 17th International Symposium on Industrial Robots, Chicago, II. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn MI, pp. 5.1–5.23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degarmo, E. P., Black, J. T. and Kosher, R. A. (1988) Materials and Processes in Manufacturing, 7th edn, MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulloy, L. P. and Kelley, R. B. (1984) Improving the precision of a robot, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics, Atlanta, GA, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn MI, pp. 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hool, J. N. (1987) Hand out for IE692-Taguchi methods, Auburn University, Auburn, AL.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1987) Working Draft on Manipulating Industrial Robots-Performance Criteria and Related Testing Methods, ISO/TC 184/SC 2/WG 2 N 8, International Standards Organization.

  • Jiang, B. C., Black, J. T. and Duraisamy, R. (1988a) A critical review on gaging robot process capability, in Conference Proceedings of Robots 12 and Vision '88, Detroit, MI, Vol. 2, Society of Manufactuning Engineers, Dearborn MI, pp. 10.1–10.11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, B. C., Black, J. T. and Duraisamy, R. (1988b) A review of recent developments in robot metrology. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 4(4), 339–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, B. C., Black, J. T., Hool, J. N. and Wu, C. M. (1989) Determine robot process capability using Taguchi methods. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 6(1), 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, B. C., Chen, D. W. H., Black, J. T. and Hool, J. N. (1991) Taguchi-based methodology for determining/optimizing robot process capability, IIE Transactions, 23(2), 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kackar, N. and Ragu, (1985) Off-line quality control, parameter design, and the Taguchi method. Journal of Quality Technology, 17(4), 176–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreamer, W. C. (1984) Measuring robot and sensor accuracy, Technical Paper MS84-1038, Society of Manufacturing Engineers.

  • Lau, K. and Hocken, R. J. (1984) A survey of current robot metrology methods. Annals of the CIRP, 32(2), 485–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R.P. (1981) Robot Manipulators, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, G. (1986) Introduction to Quality Engineering, Asian Productivity Organization.

  • Warnecke, H. J. and Schiele, G. (1984) Performance characteristics and performance testing of industrial robots-state of the art, in Proceedings of the 1st Robotics Europe Conference, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 17.

  • Warnecke, H. J., Schraft, R. D. and Wanner, M. C. (1985) Performance testing, in Handbook of Industrial Robotics, Nof, S. Y. (ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 158–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, D. E., Lozinski, C. A. and Rourke, J. M. (1986) Industrial robot forward calibration method and results. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 108, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, D. E. and Rourke, J. M. (1986) Mechanical behaviour and design equations for elastomer shear pad remote center compliances. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 108, 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. and Moore, W. H. (1985) Quality Engineering-Product and Process Design Optimization, American Supplier Institute, Dearborn, MI.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

JIANG , B.C., DURAISAMY , R., WIENS , G. et al. Robot metrology using two kinds of measurement equipment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 8, 137–146 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018508805175

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018508805175

Navigation