Skip to main content
Log in

Fitting Distances by Tree Metrics with Increment Error

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Lp-min increment fit and Lp-min increment ultrametric fit problems are two popular optimization problems arising from distance methods for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. This paper proves

1. An O(n2) algorithm for approximating L -min increment fit within ratio 3.

2. A ratio-O n 1/p polynomial time approximation to Lp-min increment ultrametric fit.

3. The neighbor-joining algorithm can correctly reconstruct a phylogenetic tree T when increment errors are small enough under L -norm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. Agarwala, V. Bafna, M. Farach, B. Narayanan, M. Paterson, and M. Thorup, “On the approximability of numerical taxonomy,” in Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 1996, pp. 365-372.

  • K. Atteson, “The performance of neighbor-joining algorithms of phylogeny reconstruction,” in Proc. of The 3rd International Conference on Computing and Combinatorics, Shanghai, 1997, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, vol. 1276, pp. 101-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.J. Bandelt and A. Dress, “Reconstructing the shape of a tree from observed dissimilarity data,” Advances in Applied Mathematics, vol. 7, pp. 309-343, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • W.H.E. Day, “Computational complexity of inferring phylogenies from dissimilarity matrices,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 461-467, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Farach, S. Kannan, and T. Warnow, “A robust model for finding optimal evolutionary trees,” Algorithmica, vol. 13, pp. 155-179, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.S. Farris, “Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices,” Am. Nat., vol. 106, pp. 645-668, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Felsenstein, “Numerical methods for inferring evolutionary trees,” Quart. Rev. Bio., vol. 57, pp. 379-404, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Křivánek, “The complexity of ultrametric partitions on graphs,” Infor. Proc. Letters, vol. 27, pp. 265-270, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.H. Papadimitriou and K. Steiglitz, Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1982.

  • N. Saitou and M. Nei, “The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees,” Mol. Biol. Evol., vol. 4, pp. 406-425, 1987.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D. Swofford, G.J. Olsen, P.J. Waddell, and D.M. Hillis, “Phylogenetic inference,” in Molecular Systematics, 2nd edition, D.M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B.K. Mable (Eds.), Sinauer Associates: Massachusetts, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.S. Waterman, T.F. Smith, M. Singh, and W.A. Beyer, “Additive evolutionary trees,” J. Theoret. Biol., vol. 64, pp. 199-213, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • B.Y. Wu, K.M. Chao, and C.Y. Tang, “Approximation and exact algorithms for constructing minimum ultrametric trees from distance matrices,” in Proc. of the 4th Annual International Conference on Computing and Combinatorics, Taiwan, 1998, pp. 299-308.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, B., Wang, L. & Zhang, L. Fitting Distances by Tree Metrics with Increment Error. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization 3, 213–225 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009837726913

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009837726913

Navigation