Skip to main content
Log in

The Applicability of Green's Theorem to Computation of Rate of Approach

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rate of approach (ROA) of a moving observer toward a scene point, as estimated at a given instant, is proportional to the component of the observer's instantaneous velocity in the direction of the point. In this paper we analyze the applicability of Green's theorem to ROA estimation. We derive a formula which relates three quantities: the average value of the ROA for a surface patch in the scene; a surface integral that depends on the surface slant of the patch; and the contour integral of the normal motion field around the image of the boundary of the patch. We analyze how much larger the ROA on the surface patch can be than the value of the contour integral, for given assumptions about the variability of the distance to points on the surface patch. We illustrate our analysis quantitatively using synthetic data, and we also validate it qualitatively on real image sequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adiv, G. 1985. Determining three-dimensional motion and structure from optical flow generated by several moving objects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 7:384–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albus, J.S. 1991. Outline for a theory of intelligence. IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 21:473–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aloimonos, Y. and Duric, Z. 1994. Estimating the heading direction using normal flow. International Journal of Computer Vision, 13:33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancona, N. and Poggio, T. 1993. Optical flow from 1D correlation: Application to a simple time-to-crash detector. In Proc. ARPA Image Understanding Workshop, pp. 673–682.

  • Atkinson, K.E. 1989. An Introduction to Numerical Analysis. John Wiley and Sons: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruss, A. and Horn, B.K.P. 1983. Passive navigation. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 21:3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlina, P. and Chellappa, R. 1996. Analyzing looming motion components from their spatiotemporal spectral signature. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18: 1029–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlina, P. and Chellappa, R. 1998. Temporal analysis of motion in video sequences through predictive operators. International Journal of Computer Vision, 28:175–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipolla, R. and Blake, A. 1992. Surface orientation and time to contact from image divergence and deformation. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 187–202.

  • Francois, E. and Bouthemy, P. 1990. Derivation of qualitative information in motion analysis. Image and Vision Computing, 8: 279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, B.K.P. and Schunck, B.G. 1981. Determining optical flow. Artificial Intelligence, 17:189–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeuchi, K. 1984. Shape from regular patterns. Artificial Intelligence, 22:49–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink, J.J. and Van Doorn, A.J. 1975. Invariant properties of the motion parallax field due to the movement of rigid bodies relative to an observer. Optica Acta, 22:773–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.N. 1980. The optical flow field: The foundation of vision. Phil. Trans. Royal Society London, B 290:169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longuet-Higgins, H.C. and Prazdny, K. 1980. The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proc. Royal Society London, B 208: 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, J.E. and Tromba, A.J. 1976. Vector Calculus, W.H. Freeman and Company: San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maybank, S.J. 1987. Apparent area of a rigid moving body. Image and Vision Computing, 5:111–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, F. and Bouthemy, P. 1992. Estimation of time-to-collision maps from first order motion models and normal flows. In Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, pp. 78–82.

  • Nakayama, K. 1985. Biological image motion processing: A review. Vision Research, 25:625–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.C. and Aloimonos, J. 1989. Obstacle avoidance using flow field divergence. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11:1102–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio, T., Verri, A., and Torre, V. 1991. Green theorems and qualitative properties of the optical flow. A.I. Memo 1289. MIT: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R. 1992. Active vision in robot navigation: Monitoring time-to-collision while tracking. In Proc. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

  • Subbarao, M. 1990. Bounds on time-to-collision and rotational component from first-order derivatives of image flow. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 50:329–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tistarelli, M. and Sandini, G. 1993. On the advantages of polar and logpolar mappings for direct estimation of time-to-impact from optical flow. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15:401–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verri, A. and Poggio, T. 1987. Against quantitative optical flow. In Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 171–180.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duric, Z., Rosenfeld, A. & Duncan, J. The Applicability of Green's Theorem to Computation of Rate of Approach. International Journal of Computer Vision 31, 83–98 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008098810511

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008098810511

Navigation