Skip to main content
Log in

Miticide bioassays with spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae): effect of test design and sample size on the precision of lethal concentration estimates

  • Mite
  • Published:
Experimental & Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of interval space between the concentration (symmetric or geometric), number of concentrations and overall sample sizes were investigated using a Petri dish bioassay, the miticide propargite and two spider mites species. The precision (width of the 95% confidence intervals) of the LC50 and LC90 estimates was shown to be influenced by the test design and total sample size The results suggest that a symmetric five-concentration design using a minimum total sample size of 480 mites is required to produce reliable LC estimates using the Petri dish method. Asymmetric designs did not increase the reliability of LC estimates. When less than 480 test subjects are available, a symmetric three-concentration design would give adequate LC estimates, but the precision would be less than with a five-concentration design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Finney, D.J. 1977. Probit Analysis, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, P.R. 1970. Optimal Bayesian sequential estimation of the median effective dose. Biometrika 57: 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, W.R. and Burnham, K.P. 1990a. BEST DOSE and RANGES: two computer programs for determining the optimal dose in diagnostic dose tests. J. Econ. Entomol. 83: 1160–1169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, W.R. and Burnham, K.P. 1990b. Choosing the optimal diagnostic dose for monitoring insecticide resistance. J. Econ. Entomol. 83: 1151–1159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabir, M.K.H. 1991. Assessment and development of bioassay methods for monitoring miticide resistance in spider mites (Tetranychidae). Unpublished PhD thesis, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.

  • Kabir, M.K.H., Chapman, R.B. and Penman, D.R. 1993. Miticide bioassays with spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae): effect of test method, exposure period and mortality criterion on the precision of response estimates. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 17: 695–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J.L., Smith, K.C., Savin, N.E. and Lavigne, R.J. 1984. Effects of dose selection and sample size on the precision of lethal dose estimates in dose-mortality regression. J. Econ. Entomol. 77: 833–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roush, R.T. and Miller, G.L. 1986. Considerations for designs of insecticide resistance monitoring programs. J. Econ. Entomol. 293–298.

  • Russell, R.M., Robertson, J.L. and Savin, N.E. 1977. POLO: A new computer program for probit analysis. Bull. Ent. Soc. Am. 23: 209–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin, N.E., Robertson, J.L. and Russell, R.M. 1977. A critical evaluation of bioassay of insecticide research: likelihood ratio tests of dose-mortality regression. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 23: 257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.C. and Robertson, J.L. 1984. DOSESCREEN: a Computer Program to Aid Dose Placement. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.C., Savin, N.E. and Robertson, J.L. 1984. A Monte Carlo comparison of maximum likelihood and minimum chi square sampling distributions in logit analysis. Biometrics 40: 471–482.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kabir, K.H., Chapman, R.B. & Penman, D.R. Miticide bioassays with spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae): effect of test design and sample size on the precision of lethal concentration estimates. Exp Appl Acarol 20, 483–494 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048281

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048281

Key words

Navigation