Abstract
Non-Gaussianity effects, first of all the influence of the third and fourth moments of the velocity probability density function, have to be assessed for higher-order closure models of turbulence and Lagrangian modelling of turbulent dispersion in complex flows. Whereas the role and the effects of the third moments are relatively well understood as essential for the explanation of specific observed features of the fully developed convective boundary layer, there are indications that the fourth moments may also be important, but little is known about these moments. Therefore, the effects of non-Gaussianity are considered for the turbulent motion of particles in non-neutral flows without fully developed convection, where the influence of the fourth moments may be expected to be particularly essential. The transport properties of these flows can be characterized by a diffusion coefficient which reflects these effects. It is shown, for different vertical velocity distributions, that the intensity of turbulent transport may be enhanced remarkably by non-Gaussianity. The diffusion coefficient is given as a modification of the Gaussian diffusivity, and this modifying factor is found to be determined to a very good approximation by the normalized fourth moment of the vertical velocity distribution function. This provides better insight into the effect of fourth moments and explains the varying importance of third and fourth moments in different flows.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baerentsen, J. H. and Berkowicz, R.: 1984, ‘Monte Carlo Simulation of Plume Dispersion in the Convective Boundary Layer’, Atmos. Environ. 18, 701–712.
Batchelor, G. K.: 1953, The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence, Cambridge University Press, 197 pp.
Caughey, S. J., Kittchen, H., and Leighton, J. R.: 1983, ‘Turbulence Structure in Convective Boundary Layers and Implications for Diffusion’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 25, 345–352.
de Baas, A. F. and Troen, I.: 1989, ‘A Stochastic Equation for Dispersion in Inhomogeneous Conditions’, Physica Scripta 40, 64–72.
Deardorff, J. W. and Willis, G. E.: 1985, ‘Further Results from a Laboratory Model of the Convective Planetary Boundary Layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 32, 205–236.
Du, S., Wilson, J. D., and Yee, E.: 1994a, ‘On the Moments Approximation Method for Constructing a Lagrangian Stochastic Model’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 40, 273–292.
Du, S., Wilson, J. D., and Yee, E.: 1994b, ‘Probability Density Functions for Velocity in the Convective Boundary Layer, and Implied Trajectory Models’, Atmos. Environ. 28, 1211–1217.
Du, S., Sawford, B. L., Wilson, J. D., and Wilson, D. J.: 1995, ‘Estimation of the Kolmogorov Constant (C o ) for the Lagrangian Structure Function, using a Second-Order Lagrangian Model of Grid Turbulence’, Phys. Fluids 7, 3083–3090.
Durbin, P. A. and Speziale, C. G.: 1994, ‘Realizability of Second-Moment Closure via Stochastic Analysis’, J. Fluid Mech. 280, 395–407.
Garratt, J. R.: 1992, The Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 316 pp.
Heinz, S.: 1997, ‘Nonlinear Lagrangian Equations for Turbulent Motion and Buoyancy in Inhomogeneous Flows’, Phys. Fluids, 9(2).
Hunt, J. C. R., Kaimal, J. C., and Gaynor, J. E.: 1988, ‘Eddy Structure in the Convective Boundary Layer-New Measurements and New Concepts’, Quart J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 114, 827–858.
Hurley, P. and Physick, W.: 1993, ‘A Skewed Homogeneous Lagrangian Particle Model for Convective Conditions’, Atmos. Environ. 27A, 619–624.
Kolomogorov, A. N.: 1942, ‘Equations of Turbulent Motion of an Incompressible Fluid’, Izv. Acad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. fiz, 6, 56–58.
Lenschow, D. H. and Stephens, P. L.: 1980, ‘The Role of Thermals in the Convective Boundary Layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 19, 509–532.
Luhar, A. K. and Britter, R. E.: 1989, ‘A Random Walk Model for Dispersion in Inhomogeneous Turbulence in a Convective Boundary Layer’, Atmos. Environ. 23, 1911–1924.
Mellor, G. L. and Yamada, T.: 1982, ‘Development of a Turbulence Closure Model for Turbulent Flows’, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20, 851–875.
Moeng, C. H. and Wyngaard, J. C.: 1989, ‘Evaluation of Turbulent Transport and Dissipation Closures in Second-Order Modelling’, J. Atmos. Sci. 46, 2311–2330.
Monin, A. S. and Yaglom, A. M.: 1971 and 1975, Statistical Fluid Mechanics, I and II, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 769 and 874 pp.
Pope, S. B.: 1994a, ‘Lagrangian PDF Methods for Turbulent Flows’, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 26, 23–63.
Pope, S. B.: 1994b, ‘On the Relationship between Stochastic Lagrangian Models of Turbulence and Second-Moment Closures’, Phys. Fluids 6, 973–985.
Randall, D. A., Shao, Q., and Moeng, C.: 1992, ‘A Second-Order Bulk Boundary-Layer Model’, J. Atmos. Sci. 49, 1903–1923.
Risken, H.: 1984, The Fokker-Planck Equation, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Sawford, B. L.: 1993, ‘Recent Developments in the Lagrangian Stochastic Theory of Turbulent Dispersion’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 62, 197–215.
Seinfeld, J. H.: 1986, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics of the Air Pollution, Wiley, New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore.
Schmidt, H. and Schumann, U.: 1989, ‘Coherent Structure of the Convective Boundary Layer Derived from Large-Eddy Simulations’, J. Fluid Mech. 200, 511–562.
Stull, R. B.: 1988, An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 666 pp.
Taconet, O. and Weil, A.: 1982, ‘Vertical Velocity Field in the Convective Boundary Layer as Observed with an Acoustic Doppler Sodar’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 23, 133–151.
Thomson, D. J.: 1987, ‘Criteria for the Selection of Stochastic Models of Particle Trajectories in Turbulent Flows’, J. Fluid Mech. 180, 529–556.
van Dop, H., Nieuwstadt, F. T. M., and Hunt, J. C. R.: 1985, ‘Random Walk Models for Particle Displacements in Inhomogeneous Unsteady Turbulent Flows’, Phys. Fluids 28, 1639–1653.
Weil, J. C.: 1990, ‘A Diagnosis of the Asymmetry in Top-Down and Bottom-Up Diffusion Using a Lagrangian Stochastic Model’, J. Atmos. Sci. 47, 501–515.
Willis, G. E. and Deardorff, J. W.: 1976, ‘A Laboratory Model of Diffusion into the Convective Planetary Boundary Layer’, Quart J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 102, 427–445.
Willis, G. E. and Deardorff, J. W.: 1978, ‘A Laboratory Study of Dispersion from an Elevated Source within a Modelled Convective Planetary Boundary Layer’, Atmos. Environ. 12, 1305–1311.
Willis, G. E. and Deardorff, J. W.: 1981, ‘A Laboratory Study of Dispersion from a Source in the Middle of the Convective Mixed Layer’, Atmos. Environ. 15, 109–117.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heinz, S., Schaller, E. On the influence of non-Gaussianity on turbulent transport. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 81, 147–166 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119063
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119063