Skip to main content
Log in

On the influence of non-Gaussianity on turbulent transport

  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-Gaussianity effects, first of all the influence of the third and fourth moments of the velocity probability density function, have to be assessed for higher-order closure models of turbulence and Lagrangian modelling of turbulent dispersion in complex flows. Whereas the role and the effects of the third moments are relatively well understood as essential for the explanation of specific observed features of the fully developed convective boundary layer, there are indications that the fourth moments may also be important, but little is known about these moments. Therefore, the effects of non-Gaussianity are considered for the turbulent motion of particles in non-neutral flows without fully developed convection, where the influence of the fourth moments may be expected to be particularly essential. The transport properties of these flows can be characterized by a diffusion coefficient which reflects these effects. It is shown, for different vertical velocity distributions, that the intensity of turbulent transport may be enhanced remarkably by non-Gaussianity. The diffusion coefficient is given as a modification of the Gaussian diffusivity, and this modifying factor is found to be determined to a very good approximation by the normalized fourth moment of the vertical velocity distribution function. This provides better insight into the effect of fourth moments and explains the varying importance of third and fourth moments in different flows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baerentsen, J. H. and Berkowicz, R.: 1984, ‘Monte Carlo Simulation of Plume Dispersion in the Convective Boundary Layer’, Atmos. Environ. 18, 701–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batchelor, G. K.: 1953, The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence, Cambridge University Press, 197 pp.

  • Caughey, S. J., Kittchen, H., and Leighton, J. R.: 1983, ‘Turbulence Structure in Convective Boundary Layers and Implications for Diffusion’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 25, 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Baas, A. F. and Troen, I.: 1989, ‘A Stochastic Equation for Dispersion in Inhomogeneous Conditions’, Physica Scripta 40, 64–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, J. W. and Willis, G. E.: 1985, ‘Further Results from a Laboratory Model of the Convective Planetary Boundary Layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 32, 205–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Wilson, J. D., and Yee, E.: 1994a, ‘On the Moments Approximation Method for Constructing a Lagrangian Stochastic Model’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 40, 273–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Wilson, J. D., and Yee, E.: 1994b, ‘Probability Density Functions for Velocity in the Convective Boundary Layer, and Implied Trajectory Models’, Atmos. Environ. 28, 1211–1217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Sawford, B. L., Wilson, J. D., and Wilson, D. J.: 1995, ‘Estimation of the Kolmogorov Constant (C o ) for the Lagrangian Structure Function, using a Second-Order Lagrangian Model of Grid Turbulence’, Phys. Fluids 7, 3083–3090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, P. A. and Speziale, C. G.: 1994, ‘Realizability of Second-Moment Closure via Stochastic Analysis’, J. Fluid Mech. 280, 395–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garratt, J. R.: 1992, The Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 316 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, S.: 1997, ‘Nonlinear Lagrangian Equations for Turbulent Motion and Buoyancy in Inhomogeneous Flows’, Phys. Fluids, 9(2).

  • Hunt, J. C. R., Kaimal, J. C., and Gaynor, J. E.: 1988, ‘Eddy Structure in the Convective Boundary Layer-New Measurements and New Concepts’, Quart J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 114, 827–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, P. and Physick, W.: 1993, ‘A Skewed Homogeneous Lagrangian Particle Model for Convective Conditions’, Atmos. Environ. 27A, 619–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolomogorov, A. N.: 1942, ‘Equations of Turbulent Motion of an Incompressible Fluid’, Izv. Acad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. fiz, 6, 56–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenschow, D. H. and Stephens, P. L.: 1980, ‘The Role of Thermals in the Convective Boundary Layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 19, 509–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhar, A. K. and Britter, R. E.: 1989, ‘A Random Walk Model for Dispersion in Inhomogeneous Turbulence in a Convective Boundary Layer’, Atmos. Environ. 23, 1911–1924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, G. L. and Yamada, T.: 1982, ‘Development of a Turbulence Closure Model for Turbulent Flows’, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20, 851–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeng, C. H. and Wyngaard, J. C.: 1989, ‘Evaluation of Turbulent Transport and Dissipation Closures in Second-Order Modelling’, J. Atmos. Sci. 46, 2311–2330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monin, A. S. and Yaglom, A. M.: 1971 and 1975, Statistical Fluid Mechanics, I and II, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 769 and 874 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, S. B.: 1994a, ‘Lagrangian PDF Methods for Turbulent Flows’, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 26, 23–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, S. B.: 1994b, ‘On the Relationship between Stochastic Lagrangian Models of Turbulence and Second-Moment Closures’, Phys. Fluids 6, 973–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. A., Shao, Q., and Moeng, C.: 1992, ‘A Second-Order Bulk Boundary-Layer Model’, J. Atmos. Sci. 49, 1903–1923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risken, H.: 1984, The Fokker-Planck Equation, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawford, B. L.: 1993, ‘Recent Developments in the Lagrangian Stochastic Theory of Turbulent Dispersion’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 62, 197–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seinfeld, J. H.: 1986, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics of the Air Pollution, Wiley, New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. and Schumann, U.: 1989, ‘Coherent Structure of the Convective Boundary Layer Derived from Large-Eddy Simulations’, J. Fluid Mech. 200, 511–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stull, R. B.: 1988, An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 666 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taconet, O. and Weil, A.: 1982, ‘Vertical Velocity Field in the Convective Boundary Layer as Observed with an Acoustic Doppler Sodar’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 23, 133–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, D. J.: 1987, ‘Criteria for the Selection of Stochastic Models of Particle Trajectories in Turbulent Flows’, J. Fluid Mech. 180, 529–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dop, H., Nieuwstadt, F. T. M., and Hunt, J. C. R.: 1985, ‘Random Walk Models for Particle Displacements in Inhomogeneous Unsteady Turbulent Flows’, Phys. Fluids 28, 1639–1653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, J. C.: 1990, ‘A Diagnosis of the Asymmetry in Top-Down and Bottom-Up Diffusion Using a Lagrangian Stochastic Model’, J. Atmos. Sci. 47, 501–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G. E. and Deardorff, J. W.: 1976, ‘A Laboratory Model of Diffusion into the Convective Planetary Boundary Layer’, Quart J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 102, 427–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G. E. and Deardorff, J. W.: 1978, ‘A Laboratory Study of Dispersion from an Elevated Source within a Modelled Convective Planetary Boundary Layer’, Atmos. Environ. 12, 1305–1311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G. E. and Deardorff, J. W.: 1981, ‘A Laboratory Study of Dispersion from a Source in the Middle of the Convective Mixed Layer’, Atmos. Environ. 15, 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heinz, S., Schaller, E. On the influence of non-Gaussianity on turbulent transport. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 81, 147–166 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119063

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119063

Keywords

Navigation