Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A record-based evaluation of induced abortion and breast cancer risk (United States)

  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective:Previous studies of induced abortion and breast cancer may have been limited by differential reporting of abortion history. We conducted a population-based case–control study to evaluate abortion (both induced and spontaneous) and breast cancer risk.

Methods:All study subjects were aged 20–69 years and members of Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound (GHC). Incident invasive breast cancer cases (n = 138) were identified from the linkage between the GHC enrollment file and the Seattle–Puget Sound SEER Cancer Registry. Controls (n = 252) were randomly selected from GHC enrollment files and matched to cases on age and enrollment period. All subjects had to have been enrolled at GHC for the 2 years preceding diagnosis (cases) or reference (controls) date. The unified medical record of each case was abstracted for pregnancy history, including prior induced and spontaneous abortions, menopause status, height and weight, screening practices, and other risk factors.

Results:Compared to all women who had never had an induced abortion, the multivariate adjusted relative risk of breast cancer in women with an induced abortion was 0.9 (95% confidence interval 0.5–1.6). This risk was similar in parous women, and nulliparous women. There was no association between spontaneous abortion and breast cancer risk.

Conclusions:These results do not support a relation between induced abortion and breast cancer incidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Russo J, Russo IH (1980) Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis. II. Pregnancy interruption as a risk factor in tumor incidence. Am J Pathol 100: 497–512.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wingo PA, Newsome K, Marks JS, Calle EE, Parker SL (1997) The risk of breast cancer following spontaneous and induced abortion. Cancer Causes Control 8: 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michels KB, Willet WC (1996) Does induced or spontaneous abortion a.ect the risk of breast cancer? Epidemiology 7: 521–528.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Newcomb PA, Storer BE, Longnecker MP, Mittendorf R, Greenberg ER, Willett WC (1996) Pregnancy termination in relation to risk of breast cancer. JAMA 275: 283–287.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bu L, Voight L, Yu Z, Malone K, Daling J (1995) Risk of breast cancer associated with induced abortion in a population at low risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 61: 181–184.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lipworth L, Katsouyanni K, Ekbom A, Michels KB, Trichopo-ulos D (1995) Abortion and risk of breast cancer: a case-control study in Greece. Int J Cancer 61: 181–184.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Michels KB, Hsieh CC, Trichopoulos D, Willett WC (1995) Abortion and breast cancer risk in seven countries. Cancer Causes Control 6: 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Andrieu N, Clavel F, Gairard B, et al. (1994) Familial risk of breast cancer and abortion. Cancer Detect Prev 18: 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daling JR, Malone KE, Voigt LF, White E, Weiss NS (1994) Risk of breast cancer among young women: relationship to induced abortion. J Natl Cancer Inst 86: 1584–1592.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Laing A, Demenais FM, Williams R, et al. (1993) Breast cancer risk factors in African-American women: the Howard University tumor registry experience. J Natl Med Assoc 85: 931–939.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Howe HL, Senie RT, Bzduch H, Herzfeld P (1989) Early abortion and breast cancer risk among women under age 40. Int J Epidemiol 18: 300–304.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ewertz M, Duffy SW (1988) Risk of breast cancer in relation to reproductive factors in Denmark. Br J Cancer 58: 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hadjimichael OC, Boyle CA, Meigs JW (1986) Abortion before first livebirth and risk of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 53: 281–284.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jones EF, Forrest JD (1992) Under reporting of abortion in surveys of U.S. women; 1976–1988. Demography 29: 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rookus MA, VanLeeuven FE (1996) Induced abortion and risk of breast cancer: reporting (recall) bias in a Dutch case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 1759–1764.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lindefors-Harris BM, Eklund G, Adami HO, Meirik O (1991) Response bias in a case-control study: analysis utilizing compar-ative data concerning legal abortions from two independent Swedish studies. Am J Epidemiol 134: 1003–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lindefors-Harris BM, Eklund G, Meirik O, Rutkvist LE, Wiklund K (1989) Risk of cancer of the breast after legal abortion in the first trimester: a Swedish register study. BMJ 299: 1430–1432.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Melbye M, Wohlfahrt J, Olsen JH, et al. (1997) Induced abortion and risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 336: 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lazovich D, Thompson JA, Minlo PJ, Sellers JA, Anderson K (2000) Induced abortions and breast cancer risk. Epidemiology 11: 76–80.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Breslow NE, Day NE (1980) Statistical methods in Cancer Research, Vol. 1. Analysis of Case-Control Studies. Lyon: Interna-tional Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC Scientific Publica-tions No. 32).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1998) Abortion surveillance: preliminary analysis-United States, 1996. MMWR Mor Mortal Wkly Rep 47: 2025–28.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Henshaw SK, Van Vort J (eds) (1992) Abortion Factbook, 1992 edition: Recent Trends and State and Local Data to 1988. New York: Alan Guttmacher Institute.

  23. Weed DL, Kramer BS (1996) Induced abortion, bias, and breast cancer: why epidemiology hasn't reached its limit. J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 1759–1764.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brind J, Chichilli VM, Severs WB, Summy-Long J (1996) Induced abortion as an independent risk factor for breast cancer: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Commun Health 50: 481–496.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Palmer JR, Rosenberg L, Rao S, et al. (1997) Induced and spontaneous abortions in relation to risk of breast cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control 8: 841–849.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilcox A, Horney LF (1984) Accuracy of spontaneous abortion recall. Am J Epidemiol 120: 727–733.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Polly A. Newcomb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Margaret T. Mandelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newcomb, P.A., Mandelson, M.T. A record-based evaluation of induced abortion and breast cancer risk (United States). Cancer Causes Control 11, 777–781 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008980804706

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008980804706

Search

Navigation