Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of triploid Citrus by isozyme analysis

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Seedlessness is a desirable horticultural attribute in Citrus and is positively associated with triploidy. The conventional cytological method for triploid identification is a laborious technique involving the preparation of root tips for chromosomal analysis. Digital densitometry of isozymes, however, offers the possibility of distinguishing triploid Citrus from large populations of seedlings both quickly and cheaply. Where there are no gene dosage regulation effects, greater band density should be evident in the allozyme contributed by the diploid gamete for a heterozygous locus. The isozymes of 4 enzymes; malate dehydrogenase, 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, shikimate dehydrogenase, and phosphoglucose isomerase, were investigated with polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Band densities of these isozymes for triploid Citrus, their diploid siblings and diploid progenitors were measured using a digital densitometer. Of the 4 enzymes investigated only allozymes for shikimate dehydrogenase exhibited consistent differences over a wide range of Citrus cultivars. Greater band density was evident in the allozyme contributed by the diploid gamete. The band density ratio between allozymes for triploid Citrus was close to 0.5, while for diploid Citrus band density ratios were close to 1.0. This effect is due to the extra protein coded by the additional gene dose and was not observed in diploids. Shikimate dehydrogenase proved to be an accurate molecular marker for distinguishing between diploid and triploid Citrus for heterozygous progeny.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PAGE:

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

MDH:

malate dehydrogenase

6PGD:

6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase

SkDH:

shikimate dehydrogenase

PGI:

phosphoglucose isomerase

References

  • Barrett H. & D. Hutchison, 1978. Spontaneous tetraploidy in apomictic seedlings of Citrus. Economic Botany 32: 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birchler J. 1983. Allozymes in gene dosage studies. In: S.D. Tanksley & T.J. Orton, (Eds.), Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding-Part A, pp. 469–515. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button J., A. Vardi & P. Spiegel-Roy, 1976. Root peroxidase isozymes as an aid in Citrus breeding and taxonomy. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 47: 119–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron J. & R. Burnett, 1978. Use of sexual tetraploid seed parents for production of triploid Citrus hybrids. HortScience 13: 167–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron J. & R. Soost, 1969. Characters of new populations of Citrus polyploids and the relation between tetraploidy in the pollen parent and hybrid tetraploid progeny. Proc. First Int. Citrus Symposium. Vol. 1, pp. 199–205. (Int. Soc. Citriculture)

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMaggio A. & J. Lambrukos, 1974. Polyploidy and gene dosage effects on peroxidase activity in ferns. Biochemical Genetics 12(6): 429–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esen A. & R. Soost, 1971. Unexpected triploids in Citrus: their origin, identification, and possible use. Journal of Heredity 62: 329–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, H. 1938. The genetics and cytology of Citrus. Current Science (Special No. on Genetics-March 1938. pp. 24–27).

  • Frost H. & C. Krug, 1942. Diploid-tetraploid periclinal chimeras as bud variants in Citrus. Genetics 27: 619–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furusato K. 1953. Tetraploidy in Citrus. Annu. Rep. Natl. Inst. Genet. — Japan 3: 51–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambert P., M. Farnier, C. Bouzerand, A. Athias & C. Lallemant, 1988. Direct quantification of serum high density lipoprotein subfractions separated by gradient gel electrophoresis. Clinica Chimica Acta 172 (2–3): 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraci G., L. Manzocchi, N. Tusa, G. Occorso, L. Rodogna & F.De Pasquale, 1981. Comparisons of different methods for identifying zygotic and nucellar seedlings in Citrus. Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture. Vol. 1, pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraci G., A. Esen & R. Soost, 1975. Triploid progenies from 2x and 2x crosses of Citrus cultivars. Journal of Heredity 66: 177–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb L. 1982. Conservation and duplication of isozymes in plants. Science 216: 373–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames B. & D. Rickwood, 1990. Gel Electrophoresis of Proteins: A Practical Approach. IRL Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito Y., M. Omura, H. Nesumi & T. Yoshida, 1992. Improvement of preparation and observation methods for Citrus chromosomes. Bull. Fruit Tree Res Stn 23: 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • King B., L. Lee, R. Rackemann & P. Scott, 1995. Electrophoretic conditions for high resolution Citrus isozymes on polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Electrophoresis 16: 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee L. 1988. Citrus polyploidy—Origins and potential for cultivar improvement. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39: 735–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. 1994. The relationship between ploidy, gene expression and vigour in Citrus. PhD Thesis. University of Wollongong, Australia.

  • Lucrettis, S., J. Chapman, A. Lister, G. Giagnacovo, A. Migliaccio, J. Dolezel & Starrantino, A. 1992. Flow cytometric analysis and sorting of Citrus protoplasts: A rapid and sensitive technique for selecting somatic hybrids and for measuring the effects of toxins. In Proc. VII Int. Cit. Cong., Int. Soc. of Citriculure.

  • Richardson B., P. Baverstock & M. Adams, 1986. Allozyme Electrophoresis. A Handbook for Animal Systematics and Population Studies. Academic Press, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosalki S. & A. Foo, 1984. Two new methods for separating and quantifying bone and liver alkaline phosphate isoenzymes in plasma. Clinical Chemistry 30(7): 1182–1186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ros Barceló A. 1987. Quantification of lupin peroxidase isoenzymes by densitometry. Anales de Biologia (Seccion Biologia General) 14(3): 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secchiero S., R. Bertorelle. M. Zaninotto & A. Burlina, 1989. An improved electrophoretic method for separating and quantifying bone and liver alkaline phosphatase isoenzyme serum. Clinical Chemical Enzymology Communications 1 (3): 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spettoli P. & G. Cacco, 1976. Activity and multiplicty of glutamic dehydrogenase in sugar-beet. Qualitas Plantarum—Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 27(2): 135–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachikawa, T., 1973. Producing tetraploid and triploid Citrus fruits and their characteristics. I Congreso Mundial De Citricultura Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, 45–51.

  • Vallejos C., 1983. Enzyme Activity Staining. In: Tanksley S.D. and Orton T.J. (Eds)., Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding—Part A, pp. 469–515. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeden N. & J. Wendel, 1989. Genetics of Plant Isozymes. In: D.E. Soltis & P.S. Soltis (Eds.), ‘Isozymes in Plant Biology’, pp. 46–72. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita K. 1983. Chimerism of Kobayashi-mikan (Citrus natsudaidai x unshiu) judged from isozyme patterns in organs and tissues. J Japan Soc Hort Sci 52(3): 223–230.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

King, B.J., Lee, L.S. & Scott, P.T. Identification of triploid Citrus by isozyme analysis. Euphytica 90, 223–231 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023862

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023862

Key words

Navigation