Skip to main content
Log in

Preliminary results of differentiating apple sports by pollen ultrastructure

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pollen grain surface morphology of two Red Delicious apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) sports, Aversang and Ultrared, and two Gala apple sports, Galalea and Splenola, were examined using scanning electron microscopy for genotype differentiation. Quantitative data on pollen dimensions, ridge patterns, and pore dimensions were extracted from micrographs using image analysis. Data were examined with analysis of variance, canonical variate analysis, and discriminant analysis in order to differentiate genotypes. The combination of image analysis to extract quantitative data and multivariate analysis was successful in differentiating apple sports with exine pore and pollen grain measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, D.G., 1993. Frequency domain self filtering for pattern detection. Image and Vision Computing 93: 237–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracewell, R.N., 1989. The Fourier Transform. Scientific American, June: 62–69.

  • Crescimmano, F.G., F.A. de Pasquale, M.A. Germana, F. Ciampolini, & M. Cresti, 1988. Ultrastructural and physiological observations on the pollen of six lemon cultivars (C. limon (L.) Burm. f.). Proceedings of the Sixth International Citrus Congress, Tel Aviv.: pp. 451–457. Balance publishers, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Castillo, J.G., S. Ganeshanandam, B.R. MacKay, G.S. Lawes, C.R.O. Lawoko, & D.J. Woolley, 1994. Canonical discriminant analysis in horticultural research. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 29(10): 1115–1119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, A.J., 1995. Differentiating apple sports by pollen ultrastructure. M. Hort. Sci. Thesis. Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogle, H.W., 1977a. Identification of tree species by pollen ultrastructure. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 102(5): 548–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogle, H.W., 1977b. Identification of clones within four tree fruit species by pollen exine patterns. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 102(5): 552–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, H., & C. Uchikawa, 1986. Electron microscopical study of mulberry with special reference to the identification of cultivars, pp. 25–29. In: K. Kitaura, T. Akihama, H. Kukimura, K. Nakajima, M. Horie and I. Kozaki (Eds.), Development of new technology for identification and classification of tree crops and ornamentals. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galletta, G.J. 1983. Pollen and seed management, pp. 23–47. In: J.N. Moore & J. Janick (Eds.), Methods in Fruit Breeding, 1st edn., vol. 1. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebda, R.J., & C.C. Chinnappa, 1990. Studies on pollen morphology of Rosaceae in Canada. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 64: 103–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozaki, I., & M. Hirai, 1986. Pollen ultrastructure of citrus for taxonomic identification, pp. 11–17. In: K. Kitaura, T. Akihama, H. Kukimura, K. Nakajima, M. Horie & I. Kozaki (Eds.), Development of new technology for identification and classification of tree crops and ornamentals. Minstry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas, J.L., 1977. Pollen ultrastructure of strawberry and other smallfruit crops. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 102(5): 560–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcucci, M.C., S. Sansavini, F. Ciampolini, & M. Cresti, 1984. Distinguishing apple clones and cultivars by surface morphology and pollen physiology. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 109(1): 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquard, R.D., & C.R. Chan, 1995. Identifying crabapple cultivars by isozymes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 120(5): 706–709.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, J., & T.A. Fretz, 1980. Identification of eight crabapples by pollen surface sculpture. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 105(2): 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, S., N. Hoshi, T. Tsuchiya, J. Soejima, S. Komori, & S. Ejiri, 1995. Acta Horticulturae, 392: 265–274.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuta, N., M. Omura, & T. Akihama, 1982. Difference in micromorphological pattern on pollen surface of Japanese Pear cultivars. Japanese Journal of Breeding, 32: 123–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuta, N., M. Omura, & T. Akihama, 1986. Identification and classification of Japanese pear cultivars by numerical approach of pollen morphology, pp. 1–10. In: K. Kitaura, T. Akihama, H. Kukimura, K. Nakajima, M. Horie & I. Kozaki (Eds.), Development of new technology for identification and classification of tree crops and ornamentals. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menendez, R.A., F.E. Larsen, & R.J. Fritts, 1986. Identification of apple rootstock cultivars by isozyme analysis. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 111(6): 933–937.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulas, M., G. D'hallewin, & G. Nieddu, 1988. Pollen ultrastructure of twenty almond cultivars. Advances in Horticultural Science, 2: 88–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, D.L., M. Cresti, S. Sansavini, G.C. Douglas, H.F. Linskens, G.B. Mulcahy, R. Vignani, & M. Pancaldi, 1993. The use of random amplified polymorphic DNAs to fingerprint apple genotypes. Scientia Horticulturae, 54: 89–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nybom, H., 1990. DNA fingerprints in sports of ‘Red Delicious’ apples. Hort Science, 12: 1641–1642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharon, D., A. Adato, S. Mhameed, U. Lavi, J. Hillel, M. Gomolka, C. Epplen, & J.T. Epplen, 1995. DNA fingerprints in plants using simple-sequence repeat and minisatellite probes. Hort Science, 30(1): 109–112.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tancred, S.J., A.G. Zeppa, & G.C. Graham, 1994. The use of PCR-RAPD technique in improving the plant variety rights description of a new Queensland apple (Malus domestica) cultivar. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 34: 665–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D.R., 1992. Interpreting Discriminant Functions: A Data Analytic Approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27(3): 335–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ueda, Y., & Y. Okada, 1994. Discrimination of rose cultivar groups by pollen surface structure. The Journal of Horticultural Science, 69: 601–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vezey, E.L., & J.J. Skvarla. 1990. Computerised feature analysis of exine sculpture patterns. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 64: 187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeden, N.F., & R.C. Lamb, 1985. Identification of apple cultivars by isozyme phenotypes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 110(4): 509–515.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, F.W., 1992. Plant variety rights testing systems in New Zealand. Plant Varieties and Seeds, 5: 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Currie, A., Noiton, D., Lawes, G. et al. Preliminary results of differentiating apple sports by pollen ultrastructure. Euphytica 98, 155–161 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003174529263

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003174529263

Navigation