Skip to main content
Log in

Transformation kinetics and potential availability of specifically-sorbed phosphate in soils

  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The improvement of P management in agriculture and environment requires a good understanding of residual effect of applied P in soils. The specific adsorption of P on variable charge minerals has been considered as the major mechanism that leads to a very low utilization of P fertilizer by crops within a growing season in Chinese red soils. Soil incubation and isotope tracing analysis were carried out to examine the transformation kinetics and potential availability of added specifically sorbed 32P in two pH contrasting light textured soils. The 32P recovered by 0.5 M NaHCO3 extraction and microbial biomass-P measurement from the added specifically sorbed 32P in the soils was well described by a first-order reaction and a Langmuir-type kinetic model, with correlation coefficients (R) being, on average, 0.938 and 0.959, respectively. The half-life (t1/2, from the first-order model) of the four tested mineral-P complexes ranged from 29 to 47 d in the acid sandy soil and 33 to 105 d in the neutral silty soil. Goethite-P was the most stable among the four tested mineral-P complexes. The potential availability of the mineral complex P (q m , in percent of total 32P added) obtained from the Langmuir equation ranged from 43.7 to 90.9% for the four mineral-P complexes, and decreased in the order: Al oxide-P (90.9%) > montmorillonite-P (86.2%) > kaolinite-P (77.5%) > goethite-P (60.2%) in the acid sandy soil, whereas the order was Al oxide-P (89.3%) > kaolinite-P (86.2%) > montmorillonite-P (82.6%) > goethite-P (43.7%) in the neutral silty soil. Based on the release rate and potential availability, kaolinite-P and Al oxide-P could be important sources for residual effect of applied P in variable-charge soils. The goethite-P has the lowest release rate and potential availability among the mineral-P complexes, implying that iron oxides may be the most important variable-charge mineral responsible for P fixation in the Chinese red soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrow NJ (1980) Evaluation and utilization of residual phosphorus in soils. In: Khasawneh FE, Sample EC, Kamprath FJ (eds) The role of Phosphorus in Agriculture. pp 333–360 Soil Sci Soc Am, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow NJ (1985) Reaction of anions and cations with variable-charge soils. Adv Agron 38; 183–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes PC, Powlson DS and Jenkenson DS (1982) Measurement of soil microbial biomass phosphorus in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 14; 377–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien SH, Clayton WR and McClellan GH (1980) Dissolution of North Carolina phosphate rocks in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44; 260–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Freese D, Lockman R, Merckx R and Riemsdijk V,[H van (1995) New method for assessment of long-term phosphate desorption from soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59; 1295–1300

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg S and Sposito G (1985) On the mechanism of specific phosphate adsorption by hydroxylated mineral surfaces: a review. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 16; 801–821

    Google Scholar 

  • He ZL, Zhu ZX and Yuan KN (1988) Phosphate desorption from some important clay minerals and typical groups of soil in China: 1. Hysteresis of adsorption and desorption. Acta Agric Univer Zhejiang 14(4); 256–263

    Google Scholar 

  • He ZL, Zhu ZX and Yuan KN (1990) Kinetics of phosphate desorption from variable-charge soils. Trans. of the 14th ICSS V.2; 331–332. Kyoto, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • He ZL, Zhu ZX and Yuan KN (1991) Assessing the fixation and availability of sorbed phosphate in soil using an isotopic exchange method. J. Soil Sci. 42(4); 661–669 (UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • He ZL, Yuan KN and Zhu ZX (1992) Effect of organic ligands on phosphate desorption. Pedosphere 2(l); 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • He ZL, Yang X and Zhu ZX (1994) Desorption and plant availability of phosphate sorbed onto some important variable-charge minerals. Plant Soil 162; 89–97

    Google Scholar 

  • He ZL, O'Donnell AG, Wu J and Syers JK (1994) Oxidation and transformation of elemental sulfur in soil. J Sci Food Agric 65; 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • He ZL, Baligar VC, Martens DC, Ritchey KD and Kemper WD (1996) Kinetics of phosphate rock dissolution in acidic soil amended with liming materials and cellulose. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60; 1589–1595.

    Google Scholar 

  • He ZL and Zhu J (1996) Microbial utilization and transformation of P sorbed by variable-charge minerals dominant in China red soils. Proc Int Sym on Plant-Soil Inter at Low pH. March 17–24, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

  • He ZL, O'Donnell AG, Wu J, Syers JK (1997) Measurement of soil microbial biomass-P at low pH soil using fumigation-extraction method. Soil Sci Soc Am J (in press)

  • Hingston FJ, Posner AM, Quirk JP (1974) Anion adsorption by goethite and gibbsite: II. desorption of anion from hydrous oxide surfaces. J Soil Sci 25; 16–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucey RMN, Janzen HH, Leggett ME (1989) Microbially mediated increases in plant-available phosphorus. Adv Agron 42; 199–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Hemandez D, Siegel g anf Rodriguez I (1986) Competitive adsorption of phosphate with malate and oxalate by tropical soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50; 1460–1462

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin RR and Smart RSTC (1987) X-ray photoelectron studies of anion adsorption on goethite. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51; 54–56

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin JR, Ryden JC and Syers JK (1981) Sorption of inorganic phosphate by iron-, aluminum-containing components. J Soil Sci 32; 365–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Okajima H, Kubota H and Sakuma T (1983) Hysteresis in the phosphorus sorption and desorption processes of soils. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 29; 271–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen SR and Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. In: Page AL, Miller RH and Keeney DR (eds) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. pp 403–427. A S A Publ., Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt RL and Atkinson RJ (1976) Phosphate adsorption on goethite (α-FeOOH). Nature 264; 740–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt RL (1978) Anion adsorption on soils and soil materials. Adv Agron 30; 1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt RL (1979) The availability of P from phosphate-goethite bridging complexes: desorption and uptake by ryegrass. Plant Soil 53; 55–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryden JC, McLaughlin JR and Syers JK (1977) Mechanisms of phosphate sorption by soils and hydrous ferric oxide gel. J Soil Sci 28; 72–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JL and Paul EA (1991) The significance of soil microbial biomass estimations. In: Bollag JM and Stotzky g (eds) Soil Biochemistry V6 pp 359–396. Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlahos S, Summers KJ, Bell DT, Gilkes RJ (1989) Reducing phophsrus leaching from sandy soils with red mud bauxite processing residues. Aust J Soil Res 27: 651–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward SC and Summers RN (1993) Modifying sandy soils with the fine residue from bauxite refining to retain phosphorus and increase plant yield. Fertil Res 36: 151–156

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, Z., Zhu, J. Transformation kinetics and potential availability of specifically-sorbed phosphate in soils. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 51, 209–215 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009749619865

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009749619865

Navigation