Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation between recombination frequency and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The origin and maintenance of genetic recombination are unsettled evolutionary issues. Genetic variation affecting recombination frequency appears to be pervasive in nature, suggesting that natural selection must increase recombination frequency under some circumstances. However, theoretical arguments and experimental evidence indicate that the frequency of recombination should be reduced by natural selection.

A hypothesis not previously explored is that recombination modifiers may directly affect the fitness of their carriers; rather than only indirectly (through the production of recombinant progeny) as generally assumed. We have tested this hypothesis by examining three fitness components (viability, male fertility, and female fecundity) in Drosophila melanogaster homozygous for second chromosomes isolated from a natural population. Then, we have measured the frequency of recombination in flies heterozygous for each wild second chromosome and a chromosome carrying five recessive alleles.

The results indicate that genes modulating the frequency of recombination have direct effects on fitness as proposed by the hypothesis. However, the correlation between frequency of recombination and fitness is negative. Thus, the riddle of recombination remains unexplained and, in fact, more puzzling that ever.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdullah, N. F. & Charlesworth, B., 1974. Selection for reduced crossing over in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 76: 447–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acton, A. B., 1961. An unsuccessful attempt to reduce recombination by selection. Am. Nat. 95: 199–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allard, R. W., 1963. Evidence for genetic restriction of recombination in the lima bean. Genetics 48: 1389–1395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, B. S., Boyd, J. B., Carpenter, A. T. C., Green, M. M., Nguyen, T. D., Ripoll, P. & Smith, P. D., 1976. Genetic controls of meiotic recombination and somatic DNA metabolism in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73: 4140–4144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H. G., 1959. Reproductive methods as factors in speciation in flowering plants. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 24: 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodmer, W. F. & Felsenstein, J., 1967. Linkage and selection: theoretical analysis of the deterministic two locus random mating model. Genetics 57: 237–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodmer, W. F. & Parsons, P. A., 1962. Linkage and recombination in evolution. Adv. Genet. 11: 1–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J. B., Harris, P. V., Osgood, C. J. & Smith, K. E., 1980. Biochemical characterization of repair-deficient mutants of Drosophila In: ‘DNA repair and mutagenesis in eukaryotes.’ ed. W. M. Generoso, M. D. Sheldy & F. J.de Serres, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B. & Charlesworth, B., 1975. An experiment on recombination load in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 25: 267–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinniei, J. P., 1971. Modification of recombination frequency in Drosophila. I. Selection for increased and decreased crossing over. Genetics 69: 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detlefsen, J. A. & Roberts, E., 1921. Studies on crossing over. I. The effect of selection on crossover values. J. exp. Zool. 32: 333–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewees, A. A., 1970. Two-way selection for recombination rates in Tribolium castaneum. (Abstract). Genetics 64: 516–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. W., Franklin, I. & Thomson, G., 1974. Selection in complex genetic systems. I. The symmetric equilibria of the three locus symmetric viability model. Genetics 76: 135–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1974. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78: 737–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. & Yokoyama, S., 1976. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. II. Individual selection forrecombination. Genetics 83: 845–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A., 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford (Reprint, Dover Publications, New York, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, I. & Lewontin, R. C., 1970. Is the gene the unit of selection? Genetics 65: 707–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowen, J. W., 1919. A biometrical study of crossing over. On the mechanism of crossing over in the third chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 4: 205–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasimoto, H., 1960. Selection of crossover value between Striped and Yellow in the silkworm. Ilème Conférence technique Sericicole Internationale, Murcie (Espagne), 365–367.

  • Karlin, S. & Feldman, M. W., 1970. Linkage and selection: two locus symmetric viability models. Theor. Pop. Biol. 1: 39–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, M. G., 1972a. Genetic changes of recombination value in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Artificial selection for high and low recombination and some properties of recombination-modifying genes. Genetics 70: 419–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, M. G., 1972b. Genetic changes of recombination value in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Simulated natural selection. Genetics 70: 433–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M., 1956. A model of a genetic system which leads to closer linkage by natural selection. Evolution 10: 278–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, D. L. & Grell, E. H., 1968. Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. No. 726, Washington, D.C.

  • Maynard Smith, J., 1968. Evolution in sexual and asexual populations. Am. Nat. 102: 469–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J., 1978. The evolution of sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., 1967. Modification of linkage intensity by natural selection. Genetics 57: 625–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A., 1958. Selection for increased recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 92: 255–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D. D., 1971. Genetic and environmental components of chiasma conrol. I. Spatial and temporal variation in Schistocerca and Stethophyma. Chromosoma 34: 281–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D. D., 1972. Genetic and environmental components of chiasma control. II. The response to selection in Schistocerca. Chromosoma 37: 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D. D., 1974. Genetic and environmental components of chiasma control. III. Genetic analysis of chiasma frequency variation in two selected lines of Schistocerca gregaria Forsk. Chromosoma 46: 365–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin, M., 1975. Gene flow and selection in a two-locus system. Genetics 81: 787–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B., 1977. Genes in populations. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strobeck, C., Maynard Smith, J. & Charlesworth, B., 1976. The effects of hitch-hiking on a gene for recombination. Genetics 82: 547–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. R. G., 1967. Why does the genome not congeal? Evolution 21: 645–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. R. G., 1979. Genetic control of recombination in the silkworm I. Multigenic control of chromosome 2. Heredity 43: 273–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C., 1975. Sex and evolution. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. & Mitton, J. B., 1973. Why reproduce sexually? J. Theor. Biol. 39: 545–554.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tucić, N., Ayala, F.J. & Marinković, D. Correlation between recombination frequency and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 56, 61–69 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126931

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126931

Keywords

Navigation