Skip to main content
Log in

Neural network models as a management tool in lakes

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A research was made on the potential use of neural network based models in eutrophication modelling. As a result, an algorithm was developed to handle the practical aspects of designing, implementing and assessing the results of a neural network based model as a lake management tool. To illustrate the advantages and limitations of the neural network model, a case study was carried out to estimate the chlorophyll-aconcentration in Keban Dam Reservoir as a function of sampled water quality parameters (PO4phosphorus, NO3nitrogen, alkalinity, suspended solids concentration, pH, water temperature, electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen concentration and Secchi depth) by a neural network based model. Alternatively, the same system was solved with a linear multiple regression model in order to compare the performances of the proposed neural network based model and the traditional linear multiple regression model. For both of the models, the linear correlation coefficients between the logarithms of observed and calculated chlorophyll-aconcentrations were calculated. The correlation coefficient R, the best linear fit between the observed and calculated values, was evaluated to assess the performances of the two models. R values of 0.74 and 0.71 were obtained for the neural network based model and the linear multiple regression model, respectively. The study showed that the neural network based model can be used to estimate chlorophyll-awith a performance similar to that of the traditional linear multiple regression method. However, for cases where the input and the output variables are not linearly correlated, neural network based models are expected to show a better performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Demuth, H. & M. Beale, 1998. Neural Network Toolbox User's Guide. The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, M. T. & M. Menhaj, 1994. Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5: 989–993

    Google Scholar 

  • Karul, C., S. Soyupak & E. Germen, 1998. A new approach to mathematical water quality modelling in reservoirs: Neural networks. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 83: 689–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiner, L. E. & C. W. Brown, 1998. A Neural Network as a non-linear chlorophyll estimation algorithm. http://orbit19i.nesdis.noaa.gov/_lkeiner/seanam_neur al/seabam2.htm

  • Recknagel, F., M. French, P. Harkonen & K. Yabunaka, 1997. Artificial neural network approach for modelling and prediction of algal blooms. Ecol. Model. 96: 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryding, S. & W. Rast, 1989. The control of eutrophication of lakes and reservoirs. Parthenon Publishing. Co., UNESCO.

  • Scardi, M., 1996. Artificial neural networks as empirical models for estimating phytoplankton production. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 139: 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, P. K., 1990. Artificial Neural Systems: Foundations, Paradigms, Applications and Implementations. Pergamon Press Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yabunaka, K., M. Hosomi & A. Murakami, 1997. Novel application of a back-propagation artificial neural network model formulated to predict algal bloom. Wat. Sci. Tech. 36: 89–97

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karul, C., Soyupak, S. & Yurteri, C. Neural network models as a management tool in lakes. Hydrobiologia 408, 139–144 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017007313690

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017007313690

Navigation