Abstract
The influence of microstructural properties on the macroscopic mechanical behaviour has been studied by finite element predictions of the response of different microstructures of polystyrene (PS) or polycarbonate (PC) containing voids or rubbery particles, subjected to unidirectional extension. The voids represent a low-modulus non-adhering dispersed phase. The rubbery inclusions, which are assumed to be pre-cavitated and perfectly adhering, idealise core-shell particles with a hard rubber shell and a soft non-adhering or pre-cavitated core. The predictions show that the inclusion properties strongly affect the averaged post-yield response of the heterogeneous systems. Especially the post-yield strain softening can be eliminated by the introduction of voids in PC or rubbery particles in PS. Since macroscopic strain softening is believed to be the main cause of catastrophical stress or strain localisations, the softening elimination is believed to be primarily responsible for toughness enhancement of the polystyrene or polycarbonate systems. The results and experiences are extrapolated in order to explain the influence of the absolute length scale of a sub-micron sized morphology on the macroscopic behaviour, especially toughness. Two potential sources of particle-size effects are presented that may result in a stabilised, and thus tougher, macroscopic mechanical response, i.e. the yield stress reduction near a surface or interface because of a locally enhanced mobility of the polymer segments, and the temporary excessive hardening because of a sufficiently small size of the yield zones which results in a reduced effective entanglement distance. The paper concludes with a discussion on the extension of this knowledge to all other, for the moment amorphous, polymers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. F. Yee, J. Mater. Sci. 12 (1977) 757.
F. J. Guild and R. J. Young, ibid. 24 (1989) 2454.
I. Narisawa, T. Kuriyama and O. Kennichiro, Makromol. Chem., Macromol. Symp. 41(1991) 87.
C. Cheng, N. Peduto, A. Hiltner, E. Baer, P. R Soskey and S. G. Mylonakis, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 53 (1994) 513.
A. J. Kinloch and F. J. Guild, in “Toughened Plastics II: Novel Approaches in Science and Engineering,” edited by C. K. Riew and A. J. Kinloch (American Chemical Society, 1996). Advances in Chemistry Series, Vol. 252.
C. J. G. Plummer, PH. B ´Eguelin and H.-H. Kausch, Polymer 37 (1996) 7.
R. A. Pearson and A. F. Yee, J. Mater. Sci. 26 (1991) 3838.
A. F. Yee idem., ibid. 21 (1986) 2475.
A. M. L. MagalhÃes and R. J. M. Borggreve, Macromolecules 28 (1995) 5841.
M. C. M. Van der sanden, J. M. M. Kok and H. E. H. Meijer, Polymer 35 (1994) 2995.
B. J. P. Jansen, S. Rastogi, H. E. H. Meijer and P. J. Lemstra, Macromolecules, submitted.
S. Rastogi, H. E. H. Meijer and P. J. Lemstra Idem., ibid. 32 (1999) 6283.
B. J. P. Jansen, PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1998.
C. B. Bucknall, A. Karpodinis and X. C. Zhang, J. Mater. Sci. 29 (1994) 3377.
A. N. Gent and P. B. Lindley, Proc. Roy. Soc. 249a (1958) 195.
C. E. Schwier, A. S. Argon and R. E. Cohen, Polymer 26 (1985) 1985.
R. A. Pearson and R. Bagheri, J. Mater. Sci. 31 (1996) 3945.
M. C. M. Van der sanden, L. G. C. Buijs, F. O. De bie and H. E. H. Meijer, Polymer 35 (1994) 2783.
R. J. M. Smit, W. A. M. Brekelmans and H. E. H. Meijer, J. Mater. Sci. 35 (2000) 2855.
W. A. M. Brekelmans and H. E. H. Meijer Idem., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 47 (1999) 201.
W. A. M. Brekelmans and H. E. H. Meijer Idem., in Proceedings of the 11th Int. Conf. on Composite Materials, Vol. V, Textile Composites and Characterisation, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, July 1997 (Australian Composite Structures Society, Melbourne) p. V585.
R. Hill, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 11 (1963) 357.
A. Bensoussan, J. L. Lions and G. Papanicolaou, “Asymptotic Analysis for Periodic Structures” (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978).
P. M. Suquet, in “Plasticity Today: Modelling, Methods and Applications, AMD-Vol. 212/MD-Vol. 62,” edited by A. Sawczuk and G. Bianchi (Elsevier Science Publishers, London, 1985) p. 279.
R. J. M. Smit, W. A. M. Brekelmans and H. E. H. Meijer, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 155 (1998) 181.
K. Dijkstra and R. J. Gaymans, J. Mater. Sci. 29 (1994) 3231.
C. Cheng, A. Hiltner, E. Baer, P. R. Soskey and S. G. Mylonakis, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 55 (1995) 1691.
M. C. Boyce, D. M. Parks and A. S. Argon, Mechanics of Materials 7 (1988) 15.
E. M. Arruda, M. C. Boyce and H. Quintus-bosz, Int. J. Plasticity 9 (1993) 783.
M. C. M. Van der sanden, H. E. H. Meijer and P. J. Lemstra, Polymer 34 (1993) 2148.
J. L. Keddie, R. A. L. Jones and R. A. Cory, Europhys. Lett. 27 (1994) 59.
T. A. Tervoort, E. T. J. Klompen and L. E. Govaert, J. Rheol. 40 (1996) 779.
E. J. Kramer, in “Adv. in Polymer Sci., Vol. 52/53,” edited by H. H. Kausch (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983) Ch. 1.
O. A. Hasan, M. C. Boyce, X. S. Li and S. Berko, J. Polymer Sci.: Part B: Polymer Phys. 31 (1993) 185.
R. J. M. Smit, W. A. M. Brekelmans and H. E. H. Meijer, J. Mater. Sci. 35 (2000) 2881.
P. D. Ritchie, S. W. CRitchley and A. Hill, “Plasticisers, Stabilisers and Fillers” (Lliffe Books, London, 1972).
C. S. Henkee and E. J. Kramer, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 22 (1984) 721.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smit, R.J.M., Brekelmans, W.A.M. & Meijer, H.E.H. Predictive modelling of the properties and toughness of polymeric materials Part II Effect of microstructural properties on the macroscopic response of rubber-modified polymers. Journal of Materials Science 35, 2869–2879 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004763606229
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004763606229