Skip to main content
Log in

Multivariate Correlation in the Framework of Support and Spatial Scales of Variability

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper extends the concept of dispersion variance to the multivariate case where the change of support affects dispersion covariances and the matrix of correlation between attributes. This leads to a concept of correlation between attributes as a function of sample supports and size of the physical domain. Decomposition of dispersion covariances into the spatial scales of variability provides a tool for computing the contribution to variability from different spatial components. Coregionalized dispersion covariances and elementary dispersion variances are defined for each multivariate spatial scale of variability. This allows the computation of dispersion covariances and correlation between attributes without integrating the cross-variograms. A correlation matrix, for a second-order stationary field with point support and infinite domain, converges toward constant correlation coefficients. The regionalized correlation coefficients for each spatial scale of variability, and the cases where the intrinsic correlation hypothesis holds are found independent of support and size of domain. This approach opens possibilities for multivariate geostatistics with data taken at different support. Two numerical examples from soil textural data demonstrate the change of correlation matrix with the size of the domain. In general, correlation between attributes is extended from the classic Pearson correlation coefficient based on independent samples to a most general approach for dependent samples taken with different support in a limited domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Goulard, M., and Voltz, M., 1992, Linear coregionalization: Tools for estimation and choice of crossvariogram matrix: Math. Geology, v. 24, no. 3, p. 269–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A. G., and Huijbregts, Ch. J., 1978, Mining geostatistics: Academic Press, New York, 600 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miesch, A. T., 1975, Variograms and variance components in geochemistry and ore evaluation: Geol. Soc. America, Mem. 142, p. 333–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. E., 1993, Change of support and transformations, in Dimitrakopoulos, R., ed., Geostatistics for the next century: Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, pp. 253–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. E., 1994, The linear model and simultaneous diagonalization of the variogram matrix function, in Fabbri, A. G., and Royer, J. J., eds., 3rd CODATA Conference on Geomathematics and Geostatistics: Sci. de la terre, Sér, Inf., Nancy, v. 32, p. 125–139.

  • Myers, D. E., 1997, Statistical models for multiple scaled analysis, in Quattrochi, D. A., and Goodchild, M., eds., Scale in remote sensing and GIS: Lewis Publishers, p. 273–294.

  • Rendu, J. M., 1978, An introduction to geostatistical methods of mineral evaluation: South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg, 84 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, D., and Jury, W., 1987, A theoretical study of the estimation of the correlation scale in spatially variable fields: Water Resources Res., v. 23, no. 7, p. 1257–1268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandjivy, L., 1984, The factorial kriging analysis of regionalized data. Its application to geochemical prospecting, in Verly, G., and others, eds., Geostatistics for natural resources characterization, NATO-ASI Series C: v. 122, Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, p. 559–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. F., 1938, An empirical law describing heterogeneity in the yields of agricultural crops: Jour. Agr. Science, v. 28, p. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, H., 1985, The inference of the linear model of coregionalization in the case of a geochemical data set: Ecole des Mines de Paris, Centre de Geostatistique et de Morphologie Mathematique, Fontainebleau, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, H., 1988, Geostatistical techniques for interpreting multivariate spatial information, in Chung, C. F., and others, eds., Quantitative analysis of mineral and energy resources, NATO ASI series C 223: Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, p. 393–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrick, A. W., and Myers, D. E., 1987, Optimization of sampling locations for variogram calculations: Water Resources Res., v. 23, no. 3, p. 496–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrick, A. W., Musil, S. A., Artiola, J. F., Hendricks, D. E., and Myers, D. E., 1990, Sampling strategies for hydrological properties and chemical constituents in the upper vadose zone, final technical report: University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 117 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, T., and Myers, D. E., 1995, Fitting matrix valued variogram models by simultaneous diagonalization: I Theory: Math. Geology, v. 27, no. 7, p. 867–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, R., Warrick, A. W., and Myers, D. E., 1987, Variance as a function of sample support size: Math. Geology, v. 22, no. 1, p. 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vargas-Guzmáan, J.A., Warrick, A.W. & Myers, D.E. Multivariate Correlation in the Framework of Support and Spatial Scales of Variability. Mathematical Geology 31, 85–103 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007545431115

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007545431115

Navigation