Skip to main content
Log in

Eupatorium cannabinum L.

A review emphasizing the sesquiterpene lactones and their biological activity

  • Review Articles
  • Published:
Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A review onEupatorium cannabinum L. is given, including botany, history and constituents. The sesquiterpene lactones are discussed in more detail, covering their biosynthesis, isolation, analysis and biological activity. Special attention is paid to the cytotoxic and antitumour activities of the sesquiterpene lactones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frohne D, Jensen U. Systematik des Pflanzenreichs. Stuttgart - New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1979:218–55.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hooker JD, Jackson BD. Index Kewensis. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1960:915–21.

    Google Scholar 

  3. King RM, Robinson H.Eupatorium, a composite genus of arcto-tertiary distribution. Taxon 1970;19:769–74.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hegnauer R. Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. Band 3. Basle - Stuttgart: Birkhaüser Verlag, 1964:448.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, et al. Flora Europaea. Vol. 4. Cambridge - London - New York- Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1976:109.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Malingré ThM.Eupatorium cannabinum L., een oud geneeskruid met nieuwe perspectieven. Pharm Weekbl 1971;106;738–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Linnaeus C. Species Plantarum. Uppsala, 1753:838.

  8. Madaus G. Lehrbuch der biologischen Heilmittel. Leipzig: Georg Thieme Verlag, 1938:1310–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dodonaeus R. Herbarius oft Cruydt-Boeck. Leyden, 1681:34–5, 941.

  10. Hoppe HA. Drogenkunde. Band i. Angiospermen. Berlin - New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1975:482–4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Van Os FHL, ed. Gids voor geneeskrachtige planten. Amsterdam: The Reader's Digest NV, 1979:157.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Von Gizycki F.Eupatorium cannabinum L., Wasserdost und Verwandte (III). Pharmazie 1951;6:686–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dolejš L, Herout V. On terpenes. CXLV. Constitution of eupatoriopicrin, a germacranolide fromEupatorium cannabinum L. Coll Czechoslov Chem Commun 1962;27:2654–61.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Droždž B, Bialek-Grygiel G. Composition of lactone fraction of leaves and inflorescence ofEupatorium cannabinum. Diss Pharm Pharmacol 1971;23:537–40.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McPhail AT, Onan KD. Crystal and molecular structure of eupatolide, the major cytotoxic principle fromEupatorium formosanum HAY. J Chem Soc Perkin II 1975: 1798–801.

  16. Droždž B, Grabarczyk H, Samek Z, Holub M, Herout V, Šorm F. Sesquiterpene lactones fromEupatorium cannabinum L. Revision of the structure of eupatoriopicrin. Coll Czechoslov Chem Commun 1972;37:1546–54.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bos R, Hendriks H, Bruins AP, Schripsema J, Kloosterman J, Sipma G. The presence of some sesquiterpene lactones inEupatorium cannabinum L. Farm Tijdschr Belg 1984;61:398.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sagareishvili TG, Alaniya MD, Kemertelidze EP. Nonpolar components ofEupatorium cannabinum. Khim Prir Soedan 1981:106–7.

  19. Rodriguez E, Towers GHN, Mitchell JC. Biological activities of sesquiterpene lactones (review). Phytochemistry 1976;15:1573–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fischer NH, Olivier EJ, Fischer HD. The biogenesis and chemistry of sesquiterpene lactones. In: Herz W, Grisebach H, Kirby GW, eds. Fortschritte der Chemie organischer Naturstoffe. Band 38. Wien - New York: Springer-Verlag, 1979:47–390.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sutherland MD; Park RJ. Sesquiterpenes and their biogenesis inMyoporum deserti A. Cunn. In: Pridham JB, ed. Terpenoids in plants. London - New York: Academic Press, 1967:148.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bohlmann F, Mahanta PH, Suwita A, et al. Neue Sesquiterpenlactone und andere Inhaltsstoffe aus Vertretern derEupatorium-Gruppe. Phytochemistry 1977;16:1973–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pedersen E. Echinatine and supinine: pyrrolizidine alkaloids fromEupatorium cannabinum. Phytochemistry 1975;14:2086–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hendriks H, Malingré ThM, Elema ET. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids, flavonoids and volatile compounds in the genusEupatorium. Pharm Weekbl [Sci] 1983;5:281–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pagani T, Romussi G. Constituents ofEupatorium cannabinum var.syriacum. Farmaco [Prat] 1967;22:771–85.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Oswiecimska M, Sendra J.Eupatorium cannabinum L., search for biologically active fraction. Diss Pharm Pharmacol 1972;24:475–83.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hendriks H, Bos R, Bruins AP. Analysis of the essential oil ofEupatorium cannabinum by combined gás chromatography - mass spectrometry using electron impact and negative ion chemical ionization. Planta Med 1985:541–2.

  28. Talaptra SK, Bhar DS, Talaptra B. Dammaradienyl acetate and taraxasterol fromEupatorium cannabinum. Mass spectrometric study of dammaradienyl acetate and its derivates. Aust J Chem 1974;27:1137–42.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dominguez XA. Eupatorieae — chemical review. In: Heywood VH, Harborne JB, Turner BL, eds. The biology and chemistry of the Compositae. Vol. II. London - New York - San Francisco: Academic Press, 1977:487–502.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vollmar A. Über immunstimulierende Wirkprinzipien ausEupatorium perfoliatum (L.) andEupatorium cannabinum (L.). München: Universität München, 1984. Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sticher O. Plant mono-, di- and sesquiterpenoids with pharmacological or therapeutic activity. In: Wagner H, Wolff P, eds. Proceedings in life sciences. New natural products and plant drugs with pharmacological, biological or therapeutical activity. Berlin - Heidelberg - New York: Springer-Verlag, 1977:137–76.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cordell GA. Recent experimental and clinical data concerning antitumor and cytotoxic agents from plants. In: Wagner H, Wolff P, eds. Proceedings in life sciences. New natural products and plant drugs with pharmacological, biological or therapeutic activity. Berlin - Heidelberg - New York: Springer-Verlag, 1977:54–81.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Smith LW, Culvenor CCJ. Plant sources of hepatotoxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Lloydia 1981;44:129–52.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kovach JS, Ames MA, Powis G, Moertel CG, Hahn RG, Creagan ET. Toxicity and pharmacokinetics of a pyrrolizidine alkaloid, indicineN-oxide, in humans. Cancer Res 1979;39:4540–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hänsel R, Haas R. Pflanzliche Immunstimulanzien und Hyposensibilisierung mit Pflanzenstoffen. In: Hänsel R, Haas R, eds. Therapie mit Phytoparmaka. Berlin - Heidelberg - New York - Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, 1983:256–61.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wagner H, Proksch A, Riess-Maurer I, et al. Immunstimulierend wirkende Polysaccharide (Heteroglykane) aus höheren Pflanzen. Arzneim Forsch/Drug Res 1984;34:659–61.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wagner H. Immunstimulantien aus Pilzen und höheren Pflanzen. In: Ölschläger H, ed. Fortschritte in der Arzneimittelforschung. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 1984:133–48.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wagner H, Proksch A, Vollmar A, Kreuzkamp B, Bauer J.In vitro Phagozytose Stimulierung durch isolierte Pflanzenstoffe gemessen im Phagozytose-Chemolumineszens-(CL)-Modell. Planta Med 1985:139–44.

  39. Rogers D, Moss GP, Neidle S. Proposed conventions for describing germacranolide sesquiterpenes. JSC Chem Comm 1972;142–3.

  40. Lee KH, Huang HC, Huang ES, Furukawa H. Antitumor agents II: eupatolide, a new cytotoxic principle fromEupatorium formosanum HAY. J Pharm Sci 1972;61:629–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kupchan SM, Kelsey JE, Maruyama M, Cassady JM, Hemingway JC, Knox JR. Tumor inhibitors XLI. Structural elucidation of tumor-inhibitory sesquiterpene lactones fromEupatorium rotundifolium. J Org Chem 1969;34:3876–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kupchan SM, Maruyama M, Hemingway RJ, Hemingway JC, Shibuya S, Fujita T. Structural elucidation of novel tumor inhibitory sesquiterpene lactones fromEupatorium cuneifolium. J Org Chem 1973;38:2189–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kupchan SM, Fujita T, Maruyama M, Britton RW. The isolation and structural elucidation of eupaserrin and deacetyleupaserrin, new antileukemic sesquiterpene lactones fromEupatorium semiserratum. J Org Chem 1973;38:1260–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Droždž B, Błoszyk E. Selective detection of sesquiterpene lactones by TLC. Planta Med 1978;33:379–84.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ito K, Sakakibara Y, Haruna M. Seven guaianolides fromEupatorium chinense. Phytochemistry 1982;21: 715–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Błoszyk E, Geppert B, Droždž B. Quantitative determination of sesquiterpene lactones in plant material by infared spectroscopy. Planta Med 1978;34:79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pyysalo H, Seppä EL, Widen KG. Application of gas chromatography to the analysis of sesquiterpene lactones fromLactarius (Russulaceae) mushrooms. J Chromatogr 1980;190:466–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Strack D, Proksch P, Gülz PG. Analysis of sesquiterpene lactones by high performance liquid chromatography. Z Naturforsch 1980;35c:915–8.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Marchand B, Behl HM, Rodriguez E. Application of high-performance liquid chromatography for analysis and isolation of sesquiterpene lactones. J Chromatogr 1983;265:97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Spring O, Priester T, Stransky H, Hager A. Sesquiterpene lactones in sunflower seedlings: distribution in the plant and occurrence in genetic varieties as determined by an isocratic HPLC technique. J Plant Physiol 1985; 120:321–9.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hall IH, Lee KH, Starnes CO, et al. Anti-inflammatory activity of sesquiterpene lactones and related compounds. J Pharm Sci 1979;68:537–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hall IH, Starnes CO, Lee KH, Waddell TG. Mode of action of sesquiterpene lactones as anti-inflammatory agents. J Pharm Sci 1980;69:537–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hall IH, Lee KH, Starnes CO, Muraoka O, Sumida Y, Waddell TG. Antihyperlipidemic activity of sesquiterpene lactones and related compounds. J Pharm Sci 1980;69:694–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Suffness M, Douros J. Current status of the NCI plant and animal product program. Lloydia 1982;45:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kupchan SM, Eakin MA, Thomas AM. Tumor inhibitors 69. Structure-cytotoxicity relationships among the sesquiterpene lactones. J Med Chem 1971;14:1147–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kupchan SM, Ashmore JW, Sneden AT. Structure-activity relationships amongin vivo active germacranolides. J Pharm Sci 1978;67:865–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lee KH, Hall IH, Mar EC, et al. Sesquiterpene antitumor agents: inhibitors of cellular metabolism. Science 1977;196:533–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Arrick BA, Nathan CF, Cohn ZA. Inhibition of glutathione synthesis augments lysis of murine tumor cells by sulfhydryl-reactive antineoplastics. J Clin Invest 1983;71:258–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Lee KH, Ibuka T, Wu RY, Geissman TA. Structure-antimicrobial activity relationship among the sesquiterpene lactones and related compounds. Phytochemistry 1977;16:1177–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Calzada J, Ciccio JF, Echandi G. Antimicrobial activity of the heliangolide chromaenolide and related sesquiterpene lactones. Phytochemistry 1980;19:967–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hładoń B, Droždž B, Grabarczyk H, Bobkiewicz T, Obszewski J. Sesquiterpene lactones. Part XIII. Cytotoxic activity of eupatolide and eupatoriopicrin on human and animal malignant cells in tissue culturein vitro. Pol J Pharmacol Pharm 1975;27:429–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Hładoń B, Droždž B, Holub M, Bobkiewicz T. Sesquiterpene lactones. Part XVI.In vitro studies on cytotoxic properties of sesquiterpene lactones in tissue cultures of human and animal malignant cells. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 1975;23:845–55.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Woerdenbag HJ, Meijer C, Mulder NH, De Vries EGE, Hendriks H, Malingré ThM. Evaluation of thein vitro cytotoxicity of some sesquiterpene lactones on a human lung carcinoma cell line using the Fast Green dye exclusion assay. Planta Med 1986:112–4.

  64. Hładoń B, Chodera A. Sesquiterpene lactones XVII. Cytostatic and pharmacological activity. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 1975;23:857–65.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Slee PHThJ, Van Oosterom AT, De Bruijn EA. Predictive testing in cancer chemotherapy. I.In vivo. Pharm Weekbl [Sci] 1985;7:93–9.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Woerdenbag HJ, Lemstra W, Malingré ThM, Konings AWT. Phytopharmacological investigation of the cytostatic effect of eupatoriopicrin on the Lewis Lung tumor. In: Federation of Medical Scientific Societies, Proceedings of the 27th Dutch Federation Meeting. Groningen: Federation of Medical Scientific Societies, 1986:452.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Takahashi T, Eto H, Ichimura T, Murae T. Hiyodorilactones A and B, new tumor inhibitory germacranolides fromEupatorium sachalinense Makino. Chem Lett 1978:1345–8.

  68. Herz W, Govindan SV. Eucannabinolide and other constituents ofSchkuhria virgata. Phytochemistry 1980;19:1234–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Takahashi T, Ichimura T, Murae T. Hiyodorilactones D, E and F, new cytotoxic sesquiterpene lactones fromEupatorium sachalinense Makino. Chem Pharm Bull 1979;27:2539–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woerdenbag, H.J. Eupatorium cannabinum L.. Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Scientific Edition 8, 245–251 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01960068

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01960068

Key words

Navigation