Skip to main content
Log in

Winter grass cover crop effects on nematodes and yields of double cropped soybean

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rye (Secale cereale L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) are commonly double cropped with soybean (Glycine max L.). Recent greenhouse studies have shown variability in plant-parasitic nematode response to cool season grass species and cultivars. However, subsequent soybean performance was not affected by previous annual ryegrass cultivar in the green-house. The objective of this research was to determine whether winter cover crop species or cultivars affected nematode populations and subsequent performance of soybean in teh field. Four cultivars of annual ryegrass, wheat, and rye, and a fallow control were seeded on a Suffolk sandy loam (fine-loamy, siliceous, thermic Typic Hapuldult) soil in each of three years. Nematode-susceptible soybeans were seeded following forage removal. Soil samples for nematode counts were taken immediately before soybean harvest each year. In another experiment, one cultivar each of annual ryegrass, wheat, and rye, and a fallow control were followed by three soybean cultivars selected for differing nematode susceptibility. Grass cultivars did not affect nematode populations under succedding soybean. The only nematodes affected by grass species in either experiment were Pratylenchus spp., Heterodera glycines Ichinohe, and Tylenchorhynchus claytoni (Kofoid and White) Chitwood. Nematode population means were usually low following ryegrass and high following the fallow control. High soybean yields followed the fallow control, and low soybean yields followed annual ryegrass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baird S M and Bernard E C 1984 Nematode population and community dynamics in soybean-wheat cropping and tillage regimes. J. Nematol. 16, 379–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig E E and Johnson K W 1975 The uniform soybean tests, Southern Region, 1974. USDA Mimeographed Rep. US Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinloch R A, Hiebsch C K and Peacock H A 1985 Comparative root-knot galling and yield response of soybean cultivars to Meloidogyne incognita. Plant. Dis. 69, 334–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koening S R, Schmidt D P and Baker K R 1985 Influence of selected cultural practices on winter survival of Pratylenchus brachyurus and subsequent effects on soybean yield. J. Nematol. 17, 464–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen J F and Rodriguez-Kabana R 1987 Nematode response to cool season annual graminaceous species and cultivars. Ann. Appl. Nematol. 1, 116–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen J F, Rodriguez-Kabana R and Shelby R A 1988 Ryegrass cultivars and endophyte in tall fescue affect nematodes in the grass and succeeding soybeans. Agron. J. 80, 811–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Kabana R and Pope M H 1981 A simplified method for extraction of nematodes in soil. Nematropica 11, 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. 1985 SAS Procedures Guide for Personal Computers. Version 6 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver D B, Rodriguez-Kabana R and Carden E L 1988 Multiple-species nematode resistance in soybean: Effect of genotype and fumigation on yield and nematode numbers. Crop Sci. 28, 293–298.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pedersen, J.F., Rodriguez-Kabana, R. Winter grass cover crop effects on nematodes and yields of double cropped soybean. Plant Soil 131, 287–291 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00009460

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00009460

Key words

Navigation