Skip to main content
Log in

Biological and chemical comparisons of methods for removing copper from macronutrient solutions used for plant growth investigations

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Two efficient procedures for the removal of copper contamination from molar stock solutions of plant macronutrients, one using the chelating ionexchange resin Chelex 100 and the other using ammonium pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate as a complexing agent followed by solvent extraction with redistilled chloroform have been described and compared biologically and chemically with two established methods of purification, the CaCO3/PO4 method of Stout and Arnon18 and the Al2O3 method of Donaldet al.6 The legumeMedicago truncatula was used for the biological test where growth responses and copper uptake values were recorded, statistically evaluated and used as a basis for comparison, while chemical tests were used for total heavy metals and residual copper in the individual molar stock solutions.

Results showed the introduced procedures, provided that free iminodiacetic acid was removed from the chelating ion-exchange resin prior to nutrient purification, to be desirable additions to the methods already accepted for work of this type while the method of Donaldet al. 6 was least effective. In addition the introduced procedures had distinct advantages over the established methods in the minimisation of heavy metal recontamination and in the apparatus required.

All methods tested produced more severe symptoms of copper deficiency in the test species than were obtained from control solutions prepared from AR. Salts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allan, J. E., The determination of copper by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Spectrochim. Acta.17, 459–66 (1961).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andrew, C. S., Copper deficiency symptoms of some tropical and temperate pasture legumes. Australian J. Agr. Research14, 654–9 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrew, C. S. and Fergus, I. F., Techniques in plant nutrition and the soil fertility survey.In Some Concepts and Methods in Sub-Tropical Pasture Research. Commonwealth Bur. Past. Field Crops Bull. No.47, 173–85 (1964).

  4. Andrew, C. S. and Thorne, Peggy, M., Comparative responses to copper of some tropical and temperature pasture legumes. Australian J. Agr. Research13, 821–35 (1962).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Anon, Separating metals using Chelex 100 chelating resin. Tech. Bull. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond.VA No.114 (1964).

  6. Donald, C., Passey, B. I., and Swaby, R. J., A comparison of methods for removing trace metals from microbiological media. J. Can. Microbiol.7, 211–20 (1952).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hewitt, E. J., Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition. Commonwealth Bur. Hort. Plantation Crops, Tech. Comm. No.22, 2nd Ed. (1966).

  8. Lipmann, C. B. and Mackinney, G., Proof of the essential nature of copper for higher green plants. Plant Physiol. (Lancaster.)6, 593–9 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Malissa, H. and Schoffmann, E., Uber die Verwendung von substituierten Dithiocarbamaten in der Mikroanalyse, III. Mikrochem. Acta.1, 187–202 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Millikan, C. R., Relative effects of zinc and copper deficiencies on lucerne and subterranean clover. Australian J. Biol. Sci.6, 164–77 (1953).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Piper, C. S., Investigations on copper deficiency in plants. J. Agr. Sci. (Cambridge)32, 143–78 (1942).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sommers, Anna, L., Copper as an essential for plant growth. Plant Physiol. (Lancaster)6, 339–45 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Steinberg, R. A., A study of some factors in the chemical stimulation of the growth ofAspergillus niger. Am. J. Botany6, 330–72 (1919).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Steinberg, R. A., Nutrient solution purification for removal of heavy metals in deficiency investigations withAspergillus niger. J. Agr. Research (Cambr.)51, 413–24 (1935).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Steinberg, R. A., Applicability of nutrient solution purification to the study of trace-elements requirements of Rhizobium and Azotobacter. J. Agr. Research (Cambr.)57, 461–76 (1938).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Steinberg, R. A., Mineral requirements ofLemna minor. Plant Physiol. (Lancaster)21, 42–8 (1946).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Steinberg, R. A., Trace element impurities in nutrient solutions for fungi. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.28, 111–6 (1950).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stout, P. R. and Arnon, D. I., Experimental methods for the study of the role of copper, manganese and zinc in the nutrition of higher plants. Am. J. Botany26, 144–9 (1939).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Turse, R. and Rieman, W., Concentrating traces of copper from 1M ammonium chloride. Anal. Chim. Acta24, 202–3 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rayment, G.E., Andrew, C.S. Biological and chemical comparisons of methods for removing copper from macronutrient solutions used for plant growth investigations. Plant Soil 36, 547–559 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01373506

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01373506

Keywords

Navigation