Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of organic soil amendments on sulfate adsorption and sulfur availability in a Brazilian Oxisol

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil management practices that involve additions of organic materials may influence plant sulfur availability in highly-weathered, acid soils. This study evaluated the effects of organic additions on sulfate adsorption and sulfur availability in a limed (3,4 t ha-1) and unlimed Typic Haplustox soil of the Cerrado Region of Brazil. In unlimed soil, the proportion of applied sulfate (600 kg S ha-1 as gypsum) that was adsorbed temporarily decreased over two cropping seasons by incorporation of 10 t dry matter ha-1 crop-1 of guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq.) but not when a similar quantity of a tropical legume, feijâo de porco (Canavalia ensiformis L.), was added. Liming reduced sulfate adsorption and resulted in sulfate leaching to a depth of 30 to 45 cm. Both plant materials temporarily reduced sulfate adsorption in laboratory studies when added to an unlimed soil at a rate equivalent to 40 t ha-1. Analysis of soil properties affected by organic additions and liming showed significant correlations between sulfate adsorption and soil pH, extractable aluminum, calcium and magnesium, and surface charge. Maize dry matter yields increased by 1.3 to 3.5 t ha-1 with addition of both organic materials. However, only the feijâo de porco treatment resulted in increases in sulfur uptake for the years in which organic materials were applied. Determining the effects of organic material additions on plant sulfur availability is complicated by the combined effects of sulfur mineralization, sulfate adsorption, and the plant's ability to utilize adsorbed subsoil sulfate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrow N J 1970 Comparison of the adsorption of molybdate, sulfate and phosphate by soils. Soil Sci. 109, 282–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow N J and Shaw T C 1977 The slow reactions between soil and anions: 7. Effect of time and temperature of contact between an adsorbing soil and sulfate. Soil Sci. 124, 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair G J 1979 Sulfur in the tropics. Int. Fert. Dev. Center. Tech. Bull. IFDC-T-12. Muscle Shoals, AL, USA. 69 p.

  • Bohn H L, Barrow N J, Rajan S S S and Parfitt R L 1986 Reactions of inorganic sulfur in soils. In Sulfur in Agriculture. Eds. M A Tabatabai, J D Beaton and R L Fox. pp 233–249. Am. Soc. of Agron. Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao T T 1964 Anionic effects on sulfate adsorption by soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 28, 581–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao T T, Harward M E and Fang S C 1964 Iron or aluminum coatings in relation to sulfate adsorption characteristics of soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 28, 632–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane T T and Souza D M G 1985 Measuring surface charge characteristics in Oxisols and Ultisols. Soil Sci. 140, 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couto W, Lathwell D J and Bouldin D R 1979 Sulfate sorption by two Oxisols and Alfisols of the tropics. Soil Sci. 127, 108–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick W A and Tabatabai M A 1979 Ion chromatographic determination of sulfate and nitrate in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43, 1196–1200.

    Google Scholar 

  • EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria) 1979 Manual of Soil Analytical Methods. Serviço Nacional de Levantamento e Conservaçâo. Rio de Janeiro, R.J., Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox R L and Blair G J 1986 Plant response to sulfur in tropical soils. In Sulfur in Agriculture. Eds. M A Tabatabai, J D Beaton and R L Fox. pp 405–434. Am. Soc. of Agron. Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt H and Coleman N T 1974 Anion adsorption by allophanic tropical soils: II. Sulfate adsorption. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 38, 259–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque I and Walmsley D 1974 Movement of sulphate in two Caribbean soils. Plant and Soil 40, 145–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamprath E J, Nelson W L and Fitts J W 1956 The effect of pH, sulfate and phosphate concentrations on the adsorption of sulfate by soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 20, 463–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Hernandez D, Siegert G and Rodriguez J V 1986 Competitive adsorption of phosphate with malate and oxalate by tropical soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50, 1460–1462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macedo J and Bryant R B 1987 Morphology, mineralogy and genesis of a hydrosequence of Oxisols in Brazil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51, 690–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcano-Martinez E J 1987 CaSO4 adsorption and surface charge properties of Oxisols. M.S. Thesis. Cornell University. Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh K B, Tillman R W and Syers J K 1987 Charge relationships of sulfate sorption by soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51, 318–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehlich A 1981 Charge properties in relation to sorption and desorption of selected cations and anions. In Chemistry in the Soil Environment. Ed. M Stelly. pp 47–75. ASA Spec. Publ. No. 40. Am. Soc. of Agron. Inc., Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motavalli P P and Duxbury J M 1987 Efeitos de adiçoes de alfafa e oxalato no mineralizaçâo de enxofre e na adsorçâo de sulfato em latossolos dos cerrados. R. bras. Ci. solo 11, 233–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prafitt R L 1978 Anion adsorption by soils and soil materials. In Advances in Agronomy. Eds. N C Brady. 30, 1–50.

  • SAS Instutute, Inc. 1982 SAS user's guide. Statistics. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai M A 1982 Sulfur. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Eds. A L Page, R H Miller and D R Keeney. pp 501–538. Am. Soc. of Agron. Inc., Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Joint contribution of Cornell University and CPAC-EM- BRAPA. This research was supported by USAID through the Title XII CRSP subgrant SM-CRSP-10 from North Carolina State University

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Motavalli, P.P., Duxbury, J.M. & de Souza, D.M.G. The influence of organic soil amendments on sulfate adsorption and sulfur availability in a Brazilian Oxisol. Plant Soil 154, 301–308 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012535

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012535

Key words

Navigation