Abstract
Biological properties of soil are not only essential for the maintenance of soil fertility and the sustainability of the plant-soil ecosystems, but also indicators of land reclamation of contaminated or disturbed soils. This experiment involves two plants (barley and field pea) growing in four soils with different hydrocarbon contents. The objective was to study the effect of hydrocarbons on plant growth and microbial activity, and to evaluate the acid phosphatase activity as an indicator of reclamation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. Barley root mass decreased with the increase of the hydrocarbon content but field pea roots were not sensitive to the hydrocarbon content in this experiment. The hydrocarbon contamination reduced the plant growth but increased the microbial activity. The acid phosphatase activity was controlled by both plant root production and microbial activity, therefore it was not a good indicator of the reclamation of oil-contaminated soils.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberta Environmental Centre 1993 The bioreactor project: the bioremediation of salt and hydrocarbon contaminated agricultural topsoils. In Alberta Environmental Centre Annual Report 1992–1993, Vegreville.
Allison, F E 1965 Organic carbon. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part II. Eds. C ABlack, D DEvans, I LWhite, L EEnsminger and F EClark. pp 1372–1376. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison.
Anderson, J E and Domsch, K H 1978 Mineralization of bacteria and fungi in chloroform fumigated soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10, 207–213.
Baker, J M 1970 The effects of oils on plants. Environ. Pollut. 1, 27–44.
Bremner, J M 1965 Total nitrogen. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 11. Eds. C ABlack, D DEvans, I LWhite, L EEnsminger and F EClark. pp 1171–1175. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison.
Chang, C W and Bandurski, R S 1964 Exocellular enzymes of corn roots. Plant Physiol. 39, 60–64.
Day, P R 1965 Particle fractionation and particle size analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Eds. C ABlack, D DEvans, I LWhite, L EEnsminger and F EClark. pp 1171–1175. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison.
De Willigen P and Van Noordwijk M 1987 Roots, plant production and nutrient use efficiency. Ph D Thesis. Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 282 p.
Dick, R P, Rasmussen, P E and Kerle, E A 1988 Influence of long-term residue management on soil enzyme activities in relation to soil chemical properties of a wheat-fallow system. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 6, 159–164.
Dick, W A and Tabatabai, M A 1993 Significance and potential uses of soil enzymes. In Soil Microbial Ecology. Ed. F BlaineMettingJr. pp 95–171. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
EPA 1981 EPA method 413.2. In Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati.
Garcia, C, Fernandez, T, Costa, F, Ceccanti, B and Masciandaro, G 1992 Kinetics of phosphatase activity in organic wastes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 561–565.
Heeraman, D A and Juma, N G 1993 A comparison of minirhizotron, core and monolith methods for quantifying barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and fababean (Vicia faba L.) root distribution. Plant and Soil 148, 29–41.
Jenkinson, D S and Powlson, D S 1976 The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil. V. A method for measuring soil biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 8, 209–213.
Juma, N G and Tabatabai, M A 1988a Hydrolysis of organic phosphates by corn and soybean roots. Plant and Soil 107, 31–38.
Juma, N G and Tabatabai, M A 1988b Phosphatase activity in corn and soybean roots: Conditions for assay and effects of metals. Plant and Soil 107, 39–47.
Klein, T M, Sorensen, D L and Redente, E F 1985 Soil enzymes: A predictor of reclamation potential and progress. In Soil Reclamation processes. Eds. R LTate and D AKlein. pp 141–171. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York.
Li, K Y, Kane, A J, Wang, J J and Cawley, W A 1993 Measurement of biodegradation rate constants of a water extract from petroleum-contaminated soil. Waste Manage. 13, 245–251.
Meadus F W, Sparks B D, Guo I and Eves G G 1993 SESR-Solvent extraction soil remediation-An innovative technology for the remediation of fine textured soils. Proc. of 3rd annual symposium on groundwater and soil remediation. Quebec city. (In press).
Nannipieri, P, Ceccanti, B, Cervelli, S and Mararese, E 1980 Extraction of phosphatase, urease, protease, organic carbon and nitrogen from soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 1011–1016.
Olsen, S R and Sommers, L E 1965 Phosphorus. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part II. Eds. C ABlack, D DEvans, I LWhite, L EEnsminger and F EClark. pp 403–430. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison.
Peech, M 1965 Hydrogen ion activity. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part II. Eds. C ABlack, D DEvans, I LWhite, L EEnsminger and F EClark. pp 914–926. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison.
Rowell, M J and Florence, L Z 1993 Characteristics associated with differences between undisturted and industrially-disturbed soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 1499–1511.
SAS institute Inc. 1987 SAS/STAT Guide. Version 6 Edition. Cary.
Skladany, G J and Metting, F BlaineJr 1993. Bioremediation of contaminated soil. In Soil Microbial Ecology. Ed. F BlaineMettingJr. pp 483–514. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
Skujinš, J J 1978 History of abiotic soil enzymes research. In Soil Enzymes. Ed. R GBurns. pp 1–49. Academic Press, New York.
Sorensen D L 1982 Biochemical activities in soil overlying Paraho processed soil shale. Ph D Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
Tabatabai, M A and Bremner, J M 1969 Use of p-nitrophenolphosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1, 301–307.
Xu, J G and Juma, N G 1993 Above- and below-ground transformation of photosynthetically fixed carbon by two barley cultivars in a Typic Cryoboroll. Soil Biol. Biochem. 15, 1263–1272.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, J.G., Johnson, R.L. Root growth, microbial activity and phosphatase activity in oil-contaminated, remediated and uncontaminated soils planted to barley and field pea. Plant Soil 173, 3–10 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155512
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155512