Skip to main content
Log in

Foliar and twig macronutrients (N, P, K, Ca and Mg) in selected species ofEucalyptus used in rehabilitation: sources of variation

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The macronutrient variation within four 6 year oldEucalyptus saligna and four 5 year oldE. wandoo growing on rehabilitated bauxite pits was determined. Significant differences in mean nutrient concentrations were generally recorded between good soil condition sites and poor soil sites, between tree individuals, branch height, and plant organ type; but mean nutrient values were not different among canopy aspects. Fully expanded leaves of the current year provided the most uniform nutrient levels among the plant organs and showed major differences between sites with good soil nutrient conditions and those with poor conditions. Differences in foliar and branch levels of N, P, K, Ca and Mg, the variation between sites, canopy heights and plant organ types, and the use of foliar nutrient levels to indicate deficiencies are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benton J D, Moss A, MacRae I, Konkin J W, McGhee W P T and Kosick R 1965 Observations on foliage nutrient content of several coniferous tree species in British Columbia. Forestry Chron. 41, 222–236.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bevege D I and Richards B N 1972 Principles and practice of foliar analysis as a basis for crop-logging in pine plantations. II. Determination of critical phosphorus levels. Plant and Soil 37, 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bould C 1961 Leaf analysis as a guide to the nutritonal status of soft fruit crops,In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems III. Am. Inst. Biol. Sci. Washington D. C., pp 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bould C 1964 Leaf analysis in relation to raspberry nutrition,In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems IV. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., Washington, D.C., pp 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cassidy N G 1970 The distribution of potassium in plants. Plant and Soil 32, 263–267.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarkson D T and Hanson J B 1980 The mineral nutrition of higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31, 239–298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Clayton J L and Kennedy D A 1980 A comparison of the nutrient content of Rocky Mountain Douglas-Fir and Ponderosa Pine trees. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note INT-281, 13 p.

  8. Everard J 1973 Foliar analysis-sampling methods, interpretation and application of the results. Qld. J. For. 67, 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gilkes R J, Scholz G and Dimmock G M 1973 Lateritic deep weathering of granite. J. Soil Sci. 24, 523–536.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodall D W and Gregory F M 1947 Chemical composition of plants as an index of their nutritional status. Imp. Bur. Hort. and Plant Crops Tech. Commun. 17, 167 p.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guha M M and Mitchell R L 1965 The trace and major element composition of the leaves of some deciduous trees. I. Sampling techniques. Plant and Soil 23, 323–338.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haines S G, Haines L W and White G 1979 Nutrient composition of sycamore blades, petioles and whole leaves. For. Sci. 25, 154–160.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hall M J and Raupach M 1963 Foliar analysis and growth responses inPinus radiata (D. Don) showing potassium deficiencies in eastern Victoria. Appita 17, 76–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heiberg S O and White D P 1951 Potassium deficiency of reforested pine and spruce stands in northern New York. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 15, 369–376.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoyle M C and D L Mader 1964 Relationships of foliar nutrients to growth of red pine in western Massachusetts. For. Sci. 10, 337–347.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Insley H, Boswell R C and Gardiner J B H 1981 Foliar macronutrients (N, P, K, Ca and Mg) in lime (Tilia spp.). I. Sampling techniques. Plant and Soil 61, 377–389.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jackson M L 1964 Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kwong S S and Boynton D 1959 Time of sampling, leaf age, and leaf fraction as factors influencing the concentrations of nutrient elements in strawberry leaves. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 73, 168–173.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lamb D 1976 Variations in the foliar concentrations of macro and micro elements in a fast-growing tropical eucalypt. Plant and Soil 43, 477–492.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lavender D P and Carmichael R L 1966 Effect of three variables on mineral concentrations in Douglas-Fir needles. For. Sci. 12, 441–446.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Leaf A L 1973 Plant analysis as an aid in fertilizing forests,In Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. Eds. L M Walsh and J D Beaton, Soil Science Society of America Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, pp 427–454.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leaf A L, Berglund J E and Leonard R E 1970 Annual variation in foliage of fertilized and/or irrigated red pine plantations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34, 677–682.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Leyton L and Armson K A 1955 Mineral composition of the foliage in relation to the growth of Scots pine. For. Sci. 1, 210–218.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lowrey G L and Avard P M 1965 Nutrient comtent of black spruce needles. I. Variation due to crown position and needle age. Pulp Pap. Res. Inst. Canada, Tech. Rept. 425, pp 21.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mader D L and Thompson B W 1969 Foliar and soil nutrients in relation to sugar maple decline. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 33, 794–800.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Milton R F and Walters W A 1948 Methods of Quantitative Microanalysis. Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Murphy J and Riley J P 1962 A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal. Chim. Acta 27, 31–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nie N H, Hall C H, Jenkins J G, Steinbrenner K and Bent D H 1970 Statistical Package for Social Sciences. 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Piper C S 1942 Soil and Plant Analysis. University of South Australia, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Raupach M and Clarke A R P 1972 Deficiency symptoms, fertilizer responses and foliar levels of potassium inPinus radiata.In Australian Forest-Tree Nutrition Conference 1971. Ed. R Boardman. Forestry and Timber Bureau, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Raupach M, Clarke A R P and Collier K M 1978 Disorder symptoms of a forest ofPinus radiata in relation to foliar nutrient levels. Aust. For. Res. 8, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schonau A P G 1981 The effects of fertilizing on the foliar nutrient concentrations inEucalyptus grandis. Fertilizer Res. 1, 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tamm C O 1955 Studies on forest nutrition. I. Seasonal variation in the nutrient content of conifer needles. Medd. Stat. Skogsf. Inst. 45, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tacey W H 1979 Landscaping and vegetation practices used in rehabilitation after bauxite mining in Western Australia. Reclam. Rev. 2, 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  35. van den Driessche R 1974 Prediction of mineral nutrient status of trees by foliar analysis. Bot. Rev. 40, 347–394.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ward S C 1983 Review of early Alcoa research on the nutrition and growth of eucalypts planted in rehabilitated bauxite mined areas in the Darling Range, Western Australia. Alcoa of Australia Ltd. Environ. Res. Bull. No. 1, 51 p.

  37. Wells C G 1965 Nutrient relationships between soils and needles of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 29, 621–624.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wells C G and Metz L J 1963 Variation in nutrient content of loblolly pine needles with season, age, soil and position in the crown. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 27, 90–93.

    Google Scholar 

  39. White D P 1954 Variation in the nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents of pine needles with season, crown position, and sample treatment. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 27, 90–93.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Will G M 1957 Variation in the mineral content of radiata pine needles with age and position in tree crown. N.Z. J. Sci. Technol. 38, 699–706.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Will G M 1965 Increased phosphorus uptake by Radiata Pine in Riverhead Forest following superphosphate application. N.Z. J. For. 10, 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wolf D 1982 A comprehensive system of leaf analyses and its use for diagnosing crop nutrient status. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 13, 1035–1059.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zasoski R J and Burau R G 1977 A rapid nitric-perchloric acid digestion method for multielement tissue analysis. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 8, 425–436.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Zinke P J 1968 Tree analysis to determine nutrient status. Calif. For. Soil Fert. Conf. (Redding) Soil Improv. Comm. Proc. 4, 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, D.T., Ward, S.C. Foliar and twig macronutrients (N, P, K, Ca and Mg) in selected species ofEucalyptus used in rehabilitation: sources of variation. Plant Soil 81, 363–376 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02323051

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02323051

Key words

Navigation