Skip to main content
Log in

Considerations in selecting a postvasectomy semen examination regimen

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The criteria for declaring a vasectomized man sterile have been the subject of debate for many years, yet most suggested regimens differ. The problem lies in the remaining unanswered physiologic questions of such a fundamental nature as to frustrate attempts to formulate a regimen based strictly on medical considerations. The rates of disappearance of sperm following vasectomy vary considerably among men. The physiologic basis for these variations are herein discussed for the first time. At present, regimens reflect, for the most part, social considerations, according to the values and perceptions of the individual physician. The problems raised by postvasectomy residual sperm and current formulation of regimens are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frischer, R.: Determinants of sterility after vasectomy.Adv. Plann. Parent, 14, 45 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marberger, H.: The mechanisms of ejaculation.Basic Life Sci., 4, 99 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mitsuya, H., Asai, J., Surjama, K., Ushida, T., Kenyo, H.: Application of X-ray cinematography in urology. In: Mechanism of Ejaculation.J. Urol., 83, 86 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eliasson, R., Lindholmer, C.: Functions of male accessory genital organs. In: E. S. E. Hafez (ed.): Human Semen and Fertility Regulation in Men. C. V. Mosby, St. Louis 1976, p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hafez, E. S. E., Prasad, M. R. N.: Functional aspects of the epididymis. In: E. S. E. Hafez (ed.): Human Semen and Fertility Regulation in Men. C. V. Mosby, St. Louis 1976, p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brueschke, E. E., Zaneveld, L. J. D., Free, M. J., Wingfield, J. R.: Vas deferens contraceptive methodology. In: E. S. E. Hafez (ed.): Human Semen and Fertility Regulation in Men. C. V. Mosby, St. Louis 1976, p. 545.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Freund, M., Davis, J. E.: Disappearance rate of spermatozoa from the ejaculate following vasectomy.Fertil. Steril., 20, 163 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, H. Y.: Technique and results of vasectomy in Korea. In: J. J. Sciarra, C. Markland, J. J. Speidel (eds): Control of Male Fertility. Harper and Row, Hagerstown 1975, p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jouannet, P., David, G.: Evolution of the properties of semen immediately following vasectomy.Fertil. Steril., 29, 435 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Banner, M. P., Hassler, R.: The normal seminal vesiculogram.Radiol., 128, 339 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zaneveld, L. J. D.: The human ejaculate and its potential for fertility control. In: J. J. Sciarra, C. Markland, J. J. Speidel (eds): Control of Male Fertility. Harper and Row, Hagerstown 1975, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Proceedings: Hormonal Control of Male Fertility. Edited by D. J. Patanelli. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare. Washington, D. C. Publication No. (NIH)78-1097.

  13. Bedford, J. M., Zelikovsky, C.: Viability of spermatozoa in the human ejaculate after vasectomy.Fertil. Steril., 32, 460 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Edwards, I. S.: Sperm motility.Fertil. Steril., 35, 484 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mumford, S. D.: Vasectomy Counseling. San Francisco Press, San Francisco 1977, p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lo, C. N., Mumford, S. D., Atwood, R. J.: Postvasectomy residual sperm pregnancy.Fertil. Steril., 33, 668 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leader, A. J., Axelrad, S. D., Frankowski, R., Mumford, S. D.: Complications of 2,711 vasectomies.J. Urol., 111, 365 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Edwards, I. S.: Vasectomy: a single postoperative regimen.Med. J. Aust., 1, 814 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Klapproth, H. J., Young, I. S.: Vasectomy, vvas ligation and vas occlusion.Urol., 1, 292 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Esho, J. O., Ireland, C. W., Cass, A. S.: Vasectomy: comparison of ligation and fulguration methods.Urol., 3, 337 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Albert, P. S., Mininberg, D. T., Davis, J. E.: Nitrofurans: sperm-immobilizing agents.Urol., 4, 307 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mumford, S.D., Davis, J.E. & Freund, M. Considerations in selecting a postvasectomy semen examination regimen. International Urology and Nephrology 14, 293–306 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02081816

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02081816

Keywords

Navigation