Skip to main content
Log in

On augmented Lagrangian decomposition methods for multistage stochastic programs

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A general decomposition framework for large convex optimization problems based on augmented Lagrangians is described. The approach is then applied to multistage stochastic programming problems in two different ways: by decomposing the problem into scenarios and by decomposing it into nodes corresponding to stages. Theoretical convergence properties of the two approaches are derived and a computational illustration is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.J. Berger, J.M. Mulvey and A. Ruszczyński, An extension of the DQA algorithm to convex stochastic programs, SIAM Journal on Optimization 4, 1994, 735–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D.P. Bertsekas,Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods, Academic Press, 1982.

  3. D.P. Bertsekas and J.N. Tsitsiklis,Parallel and Distributed Computation, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.R. Birge, Decomposition and partitioning methods for multistage stochastic linear programs, Operations Research 33, 1985, 989–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Brooke, D. Kendrick and A. Meeraus,GAMS: A User's Guide, The Scientific Press, San Francisco, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G.B. Dantzig and P. Wolfe, Decomposition principle for linear programs, Operations Research 8, 1960, 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Fortin and R. Glowinski, On decomposition-coordination methods using an augmented Lagrangian, inAugmented Lagrangian Methods: Applications to the Numerical Solution of Boundary-Value Problems, M. Fortin and R. Glowinski, eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 97–146.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H.I. Gassmann, MSLiP: A computer code for the multistage stochastic linear programming problem, Mathematical Programming 47, 1990, 407–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Gondzio and A. Ruszczyński, A sensitivity method for basis inverse representation in multistage stochastic linear programming problems, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 74, 1992, 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. I.J. Lustig, J.M. Mulvey and T.J. Carpenter, Formulating stochastic programs for interior point methods, Operations Research 39, 1991, 757–770.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. A.S. Manne and R.G. Richels, Global CO2 emission reductions — the impacts of rising energy costs, The Energy Journal 12, 1991, 87–107.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A.S. Manne and R.G. Richels,Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of CO2 Emission Limits, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.M. Mulvey and A. Ruszczyński, A diagonal quadratic approximation method for large-scale linear programs, Operations Research Letters 12, 1992, 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J.M. Mulvey and A. Ruszczyński, A new scenario decomposition method for large-scale stochastic optimization, Operations Research 43, 1995, 477–490.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B.A. Murtagh and M.A. Saunders,MINOS 5.1 User's Guide, Report SOL-83-20R, Systems Optimization Library, Standford, CA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B.N. Pshenichnyi,Convex Analysis and Extremal Problems, Nauka, Moscow, 1980 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.T. Rockafellar,Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.T. Rockafellar, Augmented Lagrangians and applications of the proximal point algorithm in convex programming, Mathematics of Operations Research 1, 1976, 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.T. Rockafellar and R.J-B Wets, Scenarios and policy aggregation in optimization under uncertainty, Mathematics of Operations Research 16, 1991, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C.H. Rosa, Pathways of economic development in an uncertain environment: A finite scenario approach to the U.S. region under carbon emission restrictions, WP-94-41, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Ruszczyński, A regularized decomposition method for minimizing a sum of polyhedral functions, Mathematical Programming 35, 1986, 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Ruszczyński, Parallel decomposition of multistage stochastic programs, Mathematical Programming 58, 1993, 201–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Ruszczyński, An augmented Lagrangian decomposition method for block diagonal linear programming problems, Operations Research Letters 8, 1989, 287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Ruszczyński, On convergence of an augmented Lagrangian decomposition method for sparse convex optimization, Mathematics of Operations Research 20, 1995, 634–656.

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. Stephanopoulos and W. Westerberg, The use of Hestenes' method of multipliers to resolve dual gaps in engineering system optimization, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 15, 1975, 285–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. R. Van Slyke and R.J-B Wets, L-shaped linear programs with applications to optimal control and stochastic programming, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 17, 1969, 638–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. R.J-B Wets, Large scale linear programming techniques, inNumerical Methods in Stochastic Programming, Yu. Ermoliev and R.J-B Wets, eds., Springer, Berlin, 1988, pp. 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosa, C.H., Ruszczyński, A. On augmented Lagrangian decomposition methods for multistage stochastic programs. Ann Oper Res 64, 289–309 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187650

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187650

Keywords

Navigation