Abstract
Twenty-four subjects were tested on their ability to discriminate between the presence and absence of negative skin potential responses before and after training to control skin potential. Training consisted of 52 discrete 30-second trials during which subjects were asked either to increase or to inhibit palmar sweating. Subjects in groups N and P were provided with analogue feedback on their skin potential activity. Group N was correctly informed that increases in sweating were indicated by increases in the negativity of skin potential; group P was misinformed that these were indicated by increases in the positivity of skin potential. Subjects in the control (C) group received no feedback. Reliable evidence of discrimination was obtained only in groups N and P, following training. However, reliable evidence of control was obtained only in group N. Thus, training to control skin potential led to an ability to identify afferentation associated with the more common (i.e., negative) skin potential responses, even though biofeedback training appeared unsuccessful in the case of group P. These findings are discussed in the context of “discrimination” or “awareness” accounts of the process of acquiring control of internal responses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baron, J. An EEG correlate of autonomic discrimination.Psychonomic Science 1966,4 255–256.
Black, A. H., Cott, A., & Pavloski, R. The operant learning theory approach to biofeedback training. In G. E. Schwartz & J. Beatty (Eds.),Biofeedback: Theory and research. New York: Academic Press, in press.
Brener, J. A general model of voluntary control applied to the phenomena of learned cardiovascular change. In P. A. Obrist, A. H. Black, J. Brener, & L. V. DiCara (Eds.),Cardiovascular psychophysiology: Current issues in response mechanisms, biofeedback, and methodology. Chicago: Aldine, 1974. (a)
Brener, J. Factors influencing the specificity of learned cardiovascular control. In L. V. DiCara (Ed.),Limbic and autonomic nervous systems research. New York: Plenum, 1974. (b)
Brener, J. Sensory and perceptual determinants of voluntary visceral control. In G. E. Schwartz & J. Beatty (Eds.),Biofeedback: Theory and research. New York: Academic Press, in press.
Brener, J. & Jones, J. M. Interoceptive discrimination in intact humans: Detection of cardiac activity.Physiology and Behavior 1974,13 763–767.
Diekhoff, G. M. Effects of feedback in a forced-choice GSR detection task.Psychophysiology 1976,13 22–26.
Kuno, Y.Human perspiration. Springfield, Illinois: Thomas, 1956.
Lacroix, J. M., & Roberts, L. E. Determinants of learned electrodermal and cardiac control: A comparative study.Psychophysiology 1976,13 175. (Abstract)
Roberts, L. E. The role of exteroceptive feedback in learned electrodermal and cardiac control: Some attractions of and problems with discrimination theory. In J. Beatty & H. Legewie (Eds.),Biofeedback and behavior. New York: Plenum, in press.
Stern, R. M. Detection of one's own spontaneous GSR's.Psychonomic Science 1972,29 354–356.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by grants from York University and from Glendon College.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lacroix, J.M. Effects of biofeedback on the discrimination of electrodermal activity. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 2, 393–406 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998624
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998624