Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the mechanisms and some properties of instructed sudomotor and cardiac control

  • Articles
  • Published:
Biofeedback and Self-regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Instructed control defined as differential compliance with verbal instructions to increase and decrease a response was assessed when a change in sudomotor activation or heart rate was specified as the behavioral goal. Instructed control of heart rate was evident prior to explicit feedback training for this response, but instructed control of sudomotor activation defined as finger sweating and measured as skin conductance was not. Feedback training subsequently established instructed control of sudomotor responding, but such training did not lead to a significant improvement in control of heart rate. Explicit strategy suggestions emphasizing emotional responding and intended or actual movement appeared to interfere with the performance of instructed control under both target conditions. Instructed changes in heart rate were attended by correlated changes in somatomotor and respiratory function. Somatomotor and respiratory responses were also observed when subjects were instructed to change sudomotor activation, but these correlated activities were of small magnitude and were not augmented by feedback training as was target responding. Several accounts of the basis for differences that were evident between the target conditions with respect to feedback effects and response patterns are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergman, J. S., & Johnson, M. J. Sources of information which affect training and raising of heart rate.Psychophysiology 1972,9 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, E. B., Scott, R. E., Young, L. D., & Edmundson, E D. Effect of knowledge of response on the self control of heart rate.Psychophysiology 1974,11 251–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, E. B., & Young, L. D. The relative efficacy of visual and auditory feedback for self-control of heart rate.Journal of General Psychology 1972,87 195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, C., & Corson, J. A. Heart rate regulation with success and failure signals.Psychophysiology 1976,13 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brener, J. M. Factors influencing the specificity of voluntary cardiovascular control. In L. V. DiCara (Ed.),Limbic and autonomic nervous systems research. New York: Plenum Press, 1974. Pp. 335–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brener, J. M. Sensory and perceptual determinants of voluntary visceral control. In G. E. Schwartz & J. Beatty (Eds.),Biofeedback: Theory and research. New York: Academic Press, 1977. Pp. 29–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brener, J. M., & Hothersall, D. Heart rate control under conditions of augmented sensory feedback.Psychophysiology 1966,3 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brener, J. M., Kleinman, R. A., & Goesling, W. J. The effects of different exposures to augmented sensory feedback on the control of heart rate.Psychophysiology 1969,5 510–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crider, A., Shapiro, D., & Tursky, B. Reinforcement of spontaneous electrodermal activity.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1966,61 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelberg, R. Mechanisms of electrodermal adaptations for locomotion, manipulation, or defense. In E. Stellar & J. M. Sprague (Eds.),Progress in physiological psychology (Vol. 5). New York: Academic Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatchel, R. J. Frequency of feedback and learned heart rate control.Journal of Experimental Psychology 1974,103 274–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavalas, R. J. Operant reinforcement of a skeletally mediated autonomic response: Uncoupling of the two responses.Psychonomic Science 1968,11 195–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D. Criterion level and instructed effects in the voluntary control of heart rate.Biological Psychology 1976,4 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, H. D. Instrumental conditioning of autonomically mediated behavior.Psychological Bulletin 1967,67 337–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinge, V. Effects of exteroceptive feedback and instructions on control of spontaneous galvanic skin responses.Psychophysiology 1972,9 305–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix, J. M. Effects of biofeedback on the discrimination of electrodermal activity.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1977,4 393–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., & Twentyman, C. T. Learning to control heart rate: Binary versus analog feedback.Psychophysiology 1974,1 616–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., & Twentyman, C. T. Learning to control heart rate: Effects of varying incentive and criterion of success on task performance.Psychophysiology 1976,13 378–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, R. W. Feedback effects and respiratory involvement in voluntary control of heart rate.Psychophysiology 1976,13 108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCanne, T. R., & Sandman, C. A. Determinants of human operant heart rate conditioning: A systematic investigation of several methodological issues.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1975,88 609–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obrist, P. A. The cardiovascular-behavioral interaction—As it appears today.Psychophysiology 1976,13 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obrist, P. A., Galosy, R. A., Lawler, J. E., Gaebelein, C. J., Howard, J. L., & Shanks, E. M. Operant conditioning of heart rate: Somatic correlates.Psychophysiology 1975,12 445–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, D. G. Operant conditioning and associated electromyogram responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology 1966,71 908–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L. E. Comparative psychophysiology of the electrodermal and cardiac control systems. In P. A. Obrist, A. H. Black, J. M. Brener, & L. V. DiCara (Eds.),Cardiovascular psychophysiology: Current issues in biofeedback, response mechanisms and methodology. Chicago: Aldine, 1974. Pp. 163–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L. E. The role of exteroceptive feedback in learned electrodermal and cardiac control: Some attractions of and problems with discrimination theory. In J. Beatty & J. Legewie (Eds.),Biofeedback and behavior. New York: Plenum Press, 1977. Pp. 261–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L. E. Operant conditioning of autonomic responses: One perspective on the curare experiments. In G. E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.),Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum Press, 1978. Pp. 241–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, I. E., & Young, R. Electrodermal responses are independent of movement during aversive conditioning in rats, but heart rate is not.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1971,77 495–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, G. E. Biofeedback and patterning of autonomic and central processes: CNS-cardiovascular interactions. In G. E. Schwartz & J. Beatty (Eds.),Biofeedback: Theory and research. New York: Academic Press, 1977. Pp. 183–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcott, R. C. Effects of high environmental temperature on sweating and skin resistance.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1963,56 778–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

These experiments constituted a doctoral dissertation submitted to McMaster University by J. M. Lacroix. The research was supported by grants from the National Research Council of Canada (A0132) and the Ontario Mental Health Foundation (345) to L. E. Roberts, who was thesis supervisor. Supplementary data analyses were supported by a grant from Glendon College to J. M. Lacroix. We wish to thank A. H. Black for his comments on this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lacroix, J.M., Roberts, L.E. A comparison of the mechanisms and some properties of instructed sudomotor and cardiac control. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 3, 105–132 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998897

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998897

Keywords

Navigation