Skip to main content
Log in

Mouse strain differences in operant self-administration of ethanol

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By the use of operant conditioning procedures, we determined whether mice from two strains, C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ, differ in ethanol-reinforced behavior. To establish ethanol as a reinforcer, drinking was induced by feeding mice prior to the 30-min experimental session. Initially mice received water and then a series of increasing ethanol concentrations (1, 2, 4, and 8%, w/v) in response to a lever press. The volume of liquid consumed per unit of body weight remained relatively constant across concentrations, and thus the amount of ethanol consumed (g/kg) increased with increases in ethanol concentration. At all concentrations the C57BL/6J mice drank larger volumes than the BALB/cJ mice. After shifting the time of feeding from before to after the session, the consumption of 8% ethanol declined 56% for the C57B/6J mice and 81% for the BALB/cJ mice. To determine if ethanol was serving as a reinforcer, behavior and intake were then compared during ethanol and water availability. The ethanol consumption of the C57BL/6J mice markedly exceeded the water consumption and resulted in blood ethanol levels of 199 ±27 mg/dl. These levels significantly exceeded the 8% ethanol intake of the BALB/cJ mice, while 0% intake was low and not significantly different between strains. The 8% ethanol drinking of the BALB/cJ mice did not differ from their water drinking. Thus, ethanol was established as a positive reinforcer for C57BL/6J mice but not for BALB/cJ mice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beardsley, P. M., and Meisch, R. A. (1981). A precision drinking device for rats tested with water, etonitazene, and ethanol.Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 14:871–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, M. E., and Meisch, R. A. (1979). Effects of food deprivation on etonitazene consumption in rats.Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 10:155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, M. E., and Meisch, R. A. (1984). Increased drug-reinforced behavior due to food deprivation. In Thompson, T., Dews, P. B., and Barrett, J. E. (eds.)Advances in Behavioral Pharmacology, Vol. 4, Academic Press, New York, pp. 47–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, M. E., Pederson, M. C., and Harrison, R. G. (1986). Food deprivation reveals strain differences in opiate intake of Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats.Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 24:1095–1099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, T. J. (1980). Alcohol self-administration, tolerance and withdrawal in humans and animals: theoretical and methodological issues. In Rigter, H., and Crabbe, J. C. (eds.),Alcohol Tolerance and Dependence, Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabbe, J. C., and Belknap, J. K. (1980). Pharmacogenetic tools in the study of drug tolerance and dependence.Subst. Alcohol Act. Misuse 1:383–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dole, V. P., and Gentry, R. T. (1984). Toward an analogue of alcoholism in mice: Scale factors in the model.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:3543–3546.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, F. R., and Meisch, R. A. (1984). Oral narcotic intake as a reinforcer: Genotype x environment interactions.Behav. Genet. 14:603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, L. A., and Stewart, R. B. (1983). Active and passive avoidance behavious in rats produced by IV infusions of ethanol.Psychopharmacology 79: 318–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningfield, J. E., and Meisch, R. A. (1979). Ethanol drinking by rhesus monkeys with concurrent access to water.Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 20:777–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningfield, J. E., and Meisch, R. A. (1981). Ethanol and water drinking by rhesus monkeys: Effects of nutritive preloading.J. Stud. Alcohol 42:192–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningfield, J. E., Ator, N. A., and Griffiths, R. R., (1981). Establishment and maintenance of oral ethanol self-administration in the baboon.Drug Alcohol Depend. 7:113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, C. E., and Schuster, C. R. (1981). Animal models of drug self-administration. InAdvances in Substance Abuse, Vol. 2, JAI Press, pp. 219–297.

  • McClearn, G. E., and Rodgers, D. A. (1959). Differences in alcohol preference among inbred strains of mice.Q. J. Stud. Alcohol 20:691–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClearn, G. E., and Rodgers, D. A. (1961). Genetic factors in alcohol preference of laboratory mice.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 54:116–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisch, R. A., (1977). Ethanol self-administration: Infrahuman studies In Thompson, T., and Dews, P. B., (eds.),Advances in Behavioral Pharmacology, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, pp. 35–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisch, R. A. (1984). Alcohol self-administration by experimental animals. In Smart, R. G., Cappell, H. D., Glaser, F. B., Israel, Y., Kalant, H., Popham, R. E., Schmidt, W., and Sellers, E. M. (eds.),Research Advances in Alcohol and Drug Problems, Vol. 8, Plenum, New York, pp. 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisch, R. A., and Beardsley, P. M. (1975). Ethanol as a reinforcer for rats: Effects of concurrent access to water and alternate positions of water and ethanol.Psychopharmacologia,43:19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisch, R. A., and Henningfield, J. E. (1977). Drinking of ethanol by rhesus monkeys: Experimental strategies for establishing ethanol as a reinforcer. In: Gross, M. M. (ed.),Alcohol Intoxication and Withdrawal, Vol. 3B, Plenum, New York, pp. 443–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mello, N. K., and Mendelson, J. H. (1971). Evaluation of a polydipsia technique to induce alcohol consumption in monkeys.Physiol. Behav. 7:827–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. L. (1972).Fundamentals of Experimental Design, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp 167–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritz, M. C., George, F. R., deFiebre, C. M., and Meisch, R. A. (1986). Genetic differences in the establishment of ethanol as a reinforcer.Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 24:1089–1094.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, D. A., McClearn, G. E., Bennett, E. L., and Hebert, M. J. (1963). Alcohol preference as a function of its caloric utility in mice.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.,56:666–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, T., George, F. R., and Meisch, R. A. (1987). Differential establishment and maintenance of oral ethanol reinforced behavior in Lewis and Fischer 344 inbred rat strains.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. (in press).

  • Waller, M. B., McBride, W. J., Gatto, G. J., Lumeng, L., and Li, T.-K. (1984). Intragastric self-infusion of ethanol by ethanol-preferring and-nonpreferring lines of rats.Science 225:78–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. M., and Herling, S. (1986). Drugs as reinforcers: Studies in laboratory animals. In Goldberg, S. R., and Stolerman, I. P. (eds.),Behavioral Analysis of Drug Dependence, Academic Press, Orlando, Fla., pp. 9–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by New Investigator Research Awards AA-06104 and AA-06924 to Frank R. George from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and by Research Scientist Development Award DA-00007 to Richard A. Meisch from the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elmer, G.I., Meisch, R.A. & George, F.R. Mouse strain differences in operant self-administration of ethanol. Behav Genet 17, 439–451 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073111

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073111

Key Words

Navigation