Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between in vivo drug exposure of the tumor interstitium and inhibition of tumor cell growth in vitro: a study in breast cancer patients

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel approach is described to simulate effect site pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs. This approach is based on (i) the in vivo measurement of unbound, interstitial drug pharmacokinetics (PK) in solid tumor lesions in patients and (ii) a subsequent pharmacodynamic (PD) simulation of the time versus drug concentration profile in an in vitro setting. For this purpose, breast cancer cells (MCF-7) were exposed in vitro to the time versus interstitial tumor concentration profiles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and methotrexate (MTX) from primary breast cancer lesions in patients. This led to a maximal reduction in the viable cell count of 69 on day 4, and of 71 on day 7 for 5-FU and MTX, respectively. This effect was dependent on the initial cell count and was characterized by a high interindividual variability. For 5-FU there was a significant correlation between the maximum antitumor effect and the intratumoral AUC (r = 0.82, p = 0.0005), whereas no correlation could be shown for MTX (r = 0.05, p = 0.88). We conclude, that the in-vivo-PK / in-vitro-PD model presented in this study may provide a rational approach for describing and predicting pharmacodynamics of cytotoxic drugs at the target site. Data derived from this approach support the concept that tumor penetration of 5-FU may be a response-limiting event, while the response to MTX may be determined by events beyond interstitial fluid kinetics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. vonHoff DD, Weisenthal L: In vitro methods to predict patient response to chemotherapy. Adv Pharmacol Chemother 7: 133–156, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huschtscha LI, Bartier WA, Ross CE, Tattersall MH: Characteristics of cancer cell death after exposure to cytotoxic drugs in vitro. Br J Cancer 73: 54–60, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  3. Levasseur LM, Slocum HK, Rustum YM, Greco WR: Modeling of the time-dependency of in vitro drug cytotoxicity and resistance. Cancer Res 58: 5749–5761, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  4. Twentyman PR: Predictive chemosensitivity testing. J Cancer 51: 295–299, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jain RK: Transport of molecules in the tumor interstitium: a review. Cancer Res 47: 3039–3051, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jain RK: Delivery of novel therapeutic agents in tumors: physiological barriers and strategies. J Natl Cancer Inst, 81: 570–576, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bateman AE, Peckham MJ, Steel GG: Assays of drug sensitivity for cells from human tumours: in vitro and in vivo tests on a xenografted tumour. Br J Cancer 40: 81–88, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jain RK: Delivery of molecular medicine to solid tumors. Science 271: 1079–1080, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jain RK: The next frontier of molecular medicine: delivery of therapeutics. Nat Med 4: 655–657, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  10. Müller M, Mader RM, Steiner B, Steger GG, Jansen B, Gnant M, Helbich T, Jakesz R, Eichler HG, Blöchl-Daum B: 5-Fluorouracil kinetics in the interstitial tumor space: clinical response in breast cancer patients. Cancer Res 57: 2598–2601, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  11. Presant CA, Wolf W, Waluch V, Wiseman C, Kennedy P, Blayney D, Brechner RR: Association of intratumor pharmacokinetics of fluorouracil with clinical response. Lancet, 343: 1184–1187, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  12. Front D, Israel O, Iosilevsky G, Even-Sapir E, Frenkel A, Peleg H, Steiner M, Kuten A, Kolodny G: Human lung tumors: SPECT Quantitation of differences in Co-57 Bleomycin uptake. Radiology 165: 129–133, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pujol JL, Cupissol D, Gestin-Boyer C, Bres J, Serrou B, Michel FB: Tumor-tissue and plasma concentrations of platinum during chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 27: 72–75, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  14. Müller M, Brunner M, Schmid R, Mader RM, Bockenheimer J, Steger GG, Steiner B, Eichler HG, Blöchl-Daum B: Interstitial methotrexate kinetics in primary breast cancer lesions. Cancer Res 58: 2982–2985, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Evans WE, Relling, MV: Clinical pharmacokineticspharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 16: 327–336, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dalla Costa T, Nolting A, Rand K, Derendorf H. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the in vitro antiinfective effect of piperacillin-tazobactam combinations. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 35: 426–433, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mader RM, Brunner M, Rizovski B, Mensik C, Steger GG, Eichler HG, Müller M: Analysis of microdialysates from cancer patients by capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 19: 2981–2985, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mader RM, Steger GG, Müller M: Mechanisms of resistance to 5-FU. Gen Pharmacol 31: 661–666, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  19. Volm M: Multidrug resistance and its reversal. Anticancer Res 18: 2905–2917, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  20. St Croix B, Man S, Kerbel RS: Reversal of intrinsic and acquired forms of drug resistance by hyaluronidase treatment of solid tumors. Cancer Lett 131: 35–44, 1998

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, M., Bockenheimer, J., Zellenberg, U. et al. Relationship between in vivo drug exposure of the tumor interstitium and inhibition of tumor cell growth in vitro: a study in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 60, 211–217 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006497202341

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006497202341

Navigation