Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison between flow cytometric assessment of S-phase fraction and Nottingham histologic grade as prognostic instruments in breast cancer

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flow cytometric DNA analysis with assessment of S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy was compared to Nottingham histologic grade. The study population consisted of 654 patients who presented between 1987 and 1996 with primary operable breast cancer and whose tumours had been analysed for S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy at the time of surgery. Grade, tumour size, node status, steroid receptor status, age, S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy were analysed univariately and multi-variately in a Cox proportional hazard analysis. In the univariate analyses all parameters were statistically significantly associated with breast cancer mortality during the follow-up period of 2–11 years. The most powerful predictor of death from breast cancer in the multiple regression analysis was grade. Patients with grade 1 tumours have excellent prognosis. We conclude that tumour grade is a strong prognostic indicator applicable to all breast cancer patients, regardless of size and nodal status, and advocate its general use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elston CW: Grading of invasive carcinoma of the breast. In: Page DL, Anderson TJ (eds) Diagnostic Histopathology of the Breast. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1987, pp 300-311

    Google Scholar 

  2. von Hanseman D: Uber assymmetrische Zelltheilung in Epitelkrebsen und deren biologische Beduetung. Virchows Arch A Pathol Pathol Anat 119: 229-326, 1890

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baldetorp B, Bendahl PO, Ferno M, Alanen K, Delle U, Falkmer U, Hansson-Aggesjo B, Hockenstrom T, Lindgren A, Mossberg L: Reproducibility in DNA flow cytometric analysis of breast cancer: comparison of 12 laboratories' results for 67 sample homogenates. Cytometry 22: 115-127, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balslev I, Axelsson CK, Zedeler K, Rasmussen BB, Carstensen B, Mouridsen HT: The Nottingham Prognostic Index applied to 9, 149 patients from the studies of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). Breast Cancer Res Treat 32: 281-290, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bergers E, Montironi R, van Diest PJ, Prete E, Baak JP: Interlaboratory reproducibility of semiautomated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometry DNA-histograms obtained from fresh material of 1, 295 breast cancer cases. Hum Pathol 27: 553-560, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dettmar P, Harbeck N, Thomssen C, Pache L, Ziffer P, Fizi K, Janicke F, Nathrath W, Schmitt M, Graeff H, Hofler H: Prognostic impact of proliferation-associated factors MIB1 (Ki-67) and S-phase in node-negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer 75: 1525-1533, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elston CW, Ellis IO: Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19: 403-410, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ferno M, Baldetorp B, Borg A, Olsson H, Sigurdsson H, Killander D: Flow cytometric DNA index and S-phase fraction in breast cancer in relation to other prognostic variables and to clinical outcome. Acta Oncol 31: 157-165, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fisher ER: Prognostic and therapeutic significance of pathological features of breast cancer. NCI Monogr 29-34, 1986

  10. Frierson HF Jr, Wilbur DC, Gaffey MJ, Salmon I, Franquemont DW, Berean KW, Wolber RA, Kiss R: Quantitative image cytometry of infiltrating ductal carcinoma: comparison with prognostic parameters and reproducibility of histological grade. Hum Pathol 27: 821-826, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frierson HF Jr, Wolber RA, Berean KW, Franquemont DW, Gaffey MJ, Boyd JC, Wilbur DC: Interobserver reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Bloom and Richardson histologic grading scheme for infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 103: 195-198, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  12. Galea MH, Blamey RW, Elston CE, Ellis IO: The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 22: 207-219, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hatschek T, Grontoft O, Fagerberg G, Stal O, Sullivan S, Carstensen J, Nordenskjold B: Cytometric and histopathologic features of tumors detected in a randomized mammography screening program: correlation and relative prognostic influence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 15: 149-160, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leonardi E, Cristofori A, Caffo O, Dalla Palma P: Cytometric DNA analysis and prognostic biomarkers in breast carcinoma. Expression of P53 product in the different ploidy classes. Anal Cell Pathol 15: 31-45, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  15. Neville AM, Bettelheim R, Gelber RD, Save-Soderbergh J, Davis BW, Reed R, Torhorst J, Golouh R, Peterson HF, Price KN: Factors predicting treatment responsiveness and prognosis in node-negative breast cancer. The International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 10: 696-705, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pfisterer J, Kommoss F, Sauerbrei W, Menzel D, Kiechle M, Giese E, Hilgarth M, Pfleiderer A: DNA flow cytometry in node-positive breast cancer. Prognostic value and correlation with morphologic and clinical factors. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 17: 406-412, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pinder SE, Murray S, Ellis IO, Trihia H, Elston CW, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Lindtner J, Cortes-Funes H, Simoncini E, Byrne MJ, Golouh R, Rudenstam CM, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Gusterson BA: The importance of the histologic grade of invasive breast carcinoma and response to chemotherapy. Cancer 83: 1529-1539, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  18. Remvikos Y, Mosseri V, Asselain B, Fourquet A, Durand JC, Pouillart P, Magdelenat H: S-phase fractions of breast cancer predict overall and post-relapse survival. Eur J Cancer 33: 581-586, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  19. Risberg B, Baldetorp B, Ferno M, Hansson B, Mossberg LL, Roos G, Stal O, Thornthwaite JT, Tibell L: Inter-institutional reproducibility of flow cytometric DNA-analysis in breast carcinomas. Anal Cell Pathol 6: 23-36, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  20. Robbins P, Pinder S, de Klerk N, Dawkins H, Harvey J, Sterrett G, Ellis I, Elston C: Histological grading of breast carcinomas: a study of introbserver agreement. Hum Pathol 26: 873-879, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sigurdsson H, Baldetorp B, Borg A, Dalberg M, Ferno M, Killander D, Olsson H: Indicators of prognosis in node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 322: 1045-1053, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sigurdsson H, Baldetorp B, Borg A, Dalberg M, Ferno M, Killander D, Olsson H, Ranstam J: Flow cytometry in primary breast cancer: improving the prognostic value of the fraction of cells in the S-phase by optimal categorisation of cut-off levels. Br J Cancer 62: 786-790, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stal O, Brisfors A, Carstensen J, Ferraud L, Hatschek T, Nordenskjold B: Relationships of DNA ploidy, S-phase fraction and hormone receptor status to tumor stage in breast cancers detected by population screening. The South-East Sweden Breast Cancer Group. Int J Cancer 51: 28-33, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stal O, Dufmats M, Hatschek T, Carstensen J, Klintenberg C, Rutqvist LE, Skoog L, Sullivan S, Wingren S, Nordenskjold B: S-phase fraction is a prognostic factor in stage I breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 11: 1717-1722, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stal O, Skoog L, Rutqvist LE, Carstensen JM, Wingren S, Sullivan S, Andersson AC, Dufmats M, Nordenskjold B: S-phase fraction and survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 70: 1258-1262, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stal O, Wingren S, Carstensen J, Rutqvist LE, Skoog L, Klintenberg C, Nordenskjold B: Prognostic value of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction in relation to estrogen receptor content and clinicopathological variables in primary breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 25: 301-309, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stat Soft I: Computer Program Manual. Stat Soft, Tulsa, OK, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sundquist M, Thorstenson S, Brudin L, Nordenskjöld B: Applying the Nottingham Prognostic Index to a Swedish breast cancer population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 53: 1-8, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vindelov L, Christensen I, Nissen N: A detergent-trypsin method for the preparation for flow cytometric DNA analysis. Cytometry 3: 323-327, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wersto RP, Stetler-Stevenson M: Debris compensation of DNA histograms and its effect on S-phase analysis. Cytometry 20: 43-52, 1995

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Kalmar, Sweden

    Marie Sundquist

  2. Department of Cytology and Pathology, Kalmar, Sweden

    Sten Thorstenson

  3. Department of Physiology, County Hospital, Kalmar, Sweden

    Lars Brudin

  4. Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden

    Olle Stål & Bo Nordenskjöld

  5. South East Swedish Breast Cancer Group, Sweden

    Olle Stål & Bo Nordenskjöld

Authors
  1. Marie Sundquist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sten Thorstenson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lars Brudin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Olle Stål
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bo Nordenskjöld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sundquist, M., Thorstenson, S., Brudin, L. et al. A comparison between flow cytometric assessment of S-phase fraction and Nottingham histologic grade as prognostic instruments in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 63, 11–15 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006494625644

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006494625644

Search

Navigation