Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective assessment of risk of bacteremia with colonoscopy and polypectomy

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prospective assessment was made of the frequency of positive blood cultures in patients undergoing colonoscopy with or without polypectomy. A total of 270 patients underwent 280 colonoscopies, of these, there were 105 patients that had 111 polypectomies. Blood cultures were taken prior to and within 15 min following each procedure. Six of 280 (2.1%) preprocedural blood cultures were positive. Seven of 169 (4%) blood cultures were positive within 15 min of insertion of the colonoscope in the colonoscopy only group. Eight of 223 (3.6%) blood cultures were positive within 10 min of the polypectomy. There was no clinical evidence of sepsis during the 24 hr following these procedures. In order to determine appropriate postprocedural sampling interyals, we induced aStaphylococcus epidermidis bacteremia with a mean of 1.16×106 colony forming units/ml on 10 occasions in seven dogs. Within 30 min of inoculation, we were able to detect only one colony forming unit/ml. The rate of positive blood cultures during colonoscopy alone and following polypectomy during colonoscopy is comparable to other gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures. The most optimal time to collect blood cultures in order to detect transient bacteremia is as soon after the procedure as is feasibly possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Low DE, Micflikier AB, Kemedy JK, Stiver HG: Infectious complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Arch Intern Med 140:1076–1077, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shull HJ, Greene BM, Allen SD, Dunn GD, Schenkers: Bacteremia with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Ann Intern Med 83:212–214, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  3. Camara DS, Gruber M, Barde CJ, Montes M, Caruana JA, Chung RS: Transient bacteremia following endoscopic injection sclerotherapy of esophageal varices. Arch Intern Med 143:1350–1352, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lefrock JL, Ellis CA, Turchik JB, Weinstein L: Transient bacteremia associated with sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med 289:467–469, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hartong WA, Barnes WG, Calking WG: The absence of bacteremia during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 67:240–244, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  6. Norfleet RG, Mitchell PD, Mulhollard DD, Philo J: Does bacteremia follow colonoscopy? II. Results with blood cultures obtained 10 and 15 minutes after colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 23:31–32, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coughlin GP, Butler RN, Alp MH, Grant AK: Colonoscopy and bacteremia. Gut 18:678–679, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  8. Norfleet RG, Mulholland DD, Mitchell PD, Philo J, Walters EW: Does bacteremia follow colonoscopy? Gastroenterology 70:20–21, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar S, Abcarian H, Prasad ML, Lakshmanan S: Bacteremia associated with lower gastrointestinal endoscopy, fact or fiction? I. Colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 25:131–134, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kiss A, Ferenci P, Graninger W, Pamper H, Potzi R, Meryn S: Endotoxaemia following colonoscopy. Endoscopy 15:24–26, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shorvan PJ, Eykyn SJ, Cotton PB: Gastrointestinal instrumentation, bacteremia, and endocarditis. Gut 24:1078–1083, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pelican G, Hentges D, Butt J, Haag T, Rolfe R, Hutcheson D: Bacteremia during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 23:33–35, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  13. Editorial: The malignant large-bowel polyp—conservative or radical treatment? Lancet 1:1387–1388, 1984

  14. Shulman ST, Amren DP, Bisno AL, Dajan AS, Durack DT, Gerber MA, Kaplan EL, Millard HD, Sanders WE, Schwartz RH, Watanakunakorn C: Prevention of bacterial endocarditis: A statement for health professionals by the Committee on Rheumatic Fever and Infective Endocarditis of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Circulation 70:1123A-1127A, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lennette EH, Balows A, Hausler WJ Jr, Shadomy HJ (eds): Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 4th ed. Washington, DC, American Society for Microbiology, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weinstein MP, Reller LB, Murphy JR, Lichtenstein KA: The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: A comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. I. Laboratory and epidemiologic observations. Rev Infect Dis 5:35–52, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reith AF, Squier TL: Blood cultures of apparently healthy persons. J Infect Dis 51:332–343, 1932

    Google Scholar 

  18. MacGregor RR, Beaty HN: Evaluation of positive blood cultures: guideline for early differentiation of contaminated from valid positive cultures. Arch Intern Med 130:84–87, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  19. Isenberg HD, Washington JA II, Balows A, Sonnenwirth AC: Collection, handling, and processing of specimens.In Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 4th ed. EH Lennette, A Balows, WJ Hausler Jr, HJ Shadomy (eds). Washington, DC, American Society for Microbiology, 1975, pp 73–98

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zierdt CH: Evidence for transientStaphylococcus epidermidis bacteremia in patients and in healthy humans. J Clin Microbiol 17:628–630, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaye D: Prophylaxis for infective endocarditis: An update. Ann Intern Med 104:419–423, 1986

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by grants from the Victoria General Hospital Research Foundation, Inc., and the Manitoba Heart Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Low, D.E., Shoenut, J.P., Kennedy, J.K. et al. Prospective assessment of risk of bacteremia with colonoscopy and polypectomy. Digest Dis Sci 32, 1239–1243 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01296372

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01296372

Key Words

Navigation