Skip to main content
Log in

Economische oorlogvoering Enige opmerkingen over boycot en embargo

Economic warfare: A note on boycott and embargo

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Why do people want a boycott or embargo? Sometimes they want to change a regime in another country. Then, success is probable only with an unstable regime and when the action is sudden and drastic. Sometimes the idea is to change the balance of power in relation to a potential enemy. In this case, more attention ought to be given to creation of bottlenecks and to the timing of actions. In most cases boycott and embargo are unsuccessful and inspired by an irrational moralistic attitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatuur

  • Adler-Karlsson, G.,Western Economic Warfare, 1947–1967: A Case Study in Foreign Economic Policy, Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis; Stockholm Economic Studies, New Series IX, Stockholm, 1968.

  • Clabaugh, S. F. enR. V. Allen,East-West Trade: Its Strategic Implications Analysis and Inventory of Congressional Documents 1959–1963, Washington D.C., 1964.

  • Curtin, T. enD. Murray,Economic Sanctions and Rhodesia, An Examination of the Probable Effect of Sanctions on National and Personal Incomes in Rhodesia and of the Effectiveness of Sanctions on Rhodesia Policy, London, 1967.

  • The Department of State Bulletin, LVI (1967), pp. 522 en 819.

  • Galtung, J., ‘On the Effects of International Economic Sanctions, with Examples from the Case of Rhodesia’,World Politics, XIX, no. 3 (1967), pp. 378–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack, D. T.,Studies in Economic Warfare, London, 1940.

  • Kernkamp, J. H.,De handel op den vijand, 1572–1609 (2 delen), Utrecht, 1931.

  • Losman, D. L., ‘The Effects of Economic Boycotts’,Lloyds Bank Review, CVI (1972), pp. 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medlicott, W. N.,The Economic Blockade (2 vols.), London, 1952, 1959.

  • Mack, A., ‘Sticks and Carrots, Theoretical Assumptions Underlying Current Work on Civilian Defence Strategies’,Proceedings of the International Peace Research Association, Third Conference, Vol. II, The International System, Assen, 1970, p. 147 e.v.

  • Mendelsohn, M. S., ‘Rhodesia-Sanctions, second round’,The Banker, (January 1967), p. 16 e.v.

  • Rasmussen, J., ‘Economic Impact of the Rhodesia Sanctions’,Proceedings of the International Peace Research Association, Third Conference, Vol. II, The International System, Assen, 1970, p. 182 e.v.

  • Segal, R. (ed.),Sanctions against South Africa, Middlesex, England: Harmondsworth, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spulber, N., ‘Effects of the Embargo on Soviet Trade’,Harvard Business Review, XXX, no. 6 (1952), pp. 122–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallensteen, P., ‘Characteristics of Economic Sanctions’,Journal of Peace Research, V, (1966), pp. 248–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilczynski, J., ‘Strategic Embargo in Perspective’,Soviet Studies, XIX, no. 1 (1967), pp. 74–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilczynski, J.,The Economics and Politics of East-West Trade, London, 1969.

  • Wiles, P. J. D., ‘Economic War and the Soviet-type Economy’,OsteuropaWirtschaft, 10. Jahrgang, Heft I (März 1965), pp. 27–42.

  • Wiles, P. J. D.,Communist International Economics, Oxford, 1968.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

De schrijver is de heer E. W. Jansen dank verschuldigd voor zijn hulp bij het verzamelen van literatuur en cijfermateriaal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dekker, P.G. Economische oorlogvoering Enige opmerkingen over boycot en embargo. De Economist 121, 387–402 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01713165

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01713165

Keywords

Navigation