Skip to main content
Log in

Keynesian and neo-classical growth models: A sequential analytical approach

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

By means of Marshall's method of analysing complex dynamic processes an attempt has been made to position Keynesian and neo-classical growth theories. Three periods have been distinguished: the short period, the medium period and the long period. By extending disequilibrium theory to the medium and the long run, models have been developed for each of the three periods. Keynesian growth theory appears essentially a theory of the medium period, neo-classical a theory of the long period. The main differences between the two theories concern the formation of expectations with respect to factor prices and the behaviour of capacity utilisation. In contrast with neo-classical theory the growth process in Keynesian growth theory does not show a tendency to Walrasian growth equilibrium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuipers, S.K. Keynesian and neo-classical growth models: A sequential analytical approach. De Economist 129, 58–104 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01705868

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01705868

Keywords

Navigation