Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attributional change and the importance of baseline recording

A case illustration

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This single case study illustrates how attention to baseline measures prevented premature conclusions regarding the impact of a conditioning procedure upon aggressive, acting-out behavior. Five disruptive behaviors were initially delineated so that frequency distributions could be obtained. During the course of this 15-day observational period, a significant reduction in the number of these aggressive responses was noted. The proposed conditioning procedure was therefore never required. Explanations as well as implications regarding the observed alteration in behavior were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A.Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackham, G. J., & Silberman, A.Modification of child and adolescent behavior. Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J. K., & Walker, H. M.Modifying classroom behavior: A manual of procedures for classroom teachers. Champaign, Illinois: Research Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, R. W., Thorp, R. K., & Donohew, L.Content analysis of communications. New York: MacMillan, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, A. S. Aversive conditioning: Learning or dissonance reduction?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968,32, 674–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fargo, G., Behrens, C., & Nolen, P.Behavior modification in the classroom. Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. J.The research process in education. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. M. Self-reinforcement versus external reinforcement in behavior modification with children.Developmental Psychology, 1970,3, 147–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, C. K., & Madsen, C. J., Jr.Parents/children/discipline: A positive approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, A. R.Behavior modification: Theory and practice. Monterey, California: Brooks/ Cole, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulzer, R., & Mayer, G. R.Behavior modification procedures for school personnel. Hinsdale, Illinois: Dryden Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann, L. P., & Krasner, L. (Eds.).Case studies in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fluvanna County Schools, Palmyra, Virginia

    Lucile E. Michie

  2. City Schools, Charlottesville, Virginia

    Mary Jean Rossi

  3. Cornell University, USA

    W. C. White Jr.

Authors
  1. Lucile E. Michie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mary Jean Rossi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. C. White Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michie, L.E., Rossi, M.J. & White, W.C. Attributional change and the importance of baseline recording. J Abnorm Child Psychol 4, 55–58 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917604

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917604

Keywords

Search

Navigation