Abstract
Wetting properties of liquid helium on rubidium metal have been investigated in the temperature range 1.0–1.7 K using a heat conduction method. The rubidium surface is found to be wetted under saturated vapor conditions. Prewetting transitions have been observed for rather weak offsets from saturation, indicating that rubidium is close to the nonwetting limit at T = 0 K. Presumably because of substrate inhomogeneities, the prewetting transitions are experimentally found to be continuous and hysteretic. No evidence for the prewetting critical point has been found up to 1.7 K. The prewetting line verifies a simple linear relation between the liquid-vapour surface tension and the two third power of the chemical potential offset, but does not conform quantitatively to the simple model currently used.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E. Zaremba and W. Kohn,Phys. Rev. B 15, 1769 (1977).
G. Vidali, G. Ihm, H. Y. Kim, and M. W. Cole,Surf. Sci. Report 12, 133 (1991).
E. Cheng, M. W. Cole, W. F. Saam, and J. Treiner,Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1007 (1991).
E. Cheng, M. W. Cole, W. F. Saam, and J. Treiner,Phys. Rev. B 46, 13967 (1992), and47, 14661 (1993).
P. J. Nacher and J. Dupont-Roc,Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2966 (1991).
P. Taborek and J. E. Rutledge,Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2184 (1992).
G. Mistura, PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University (1993).
G. Mistura, H. C. Lee, and M. H. W. Chan,Physica. B 194-196, 661 (1994).
W. F. Saam, J. Treiner, E. Cheng, and M. W. Cole,J. Low Temp. Phys. 89, 637 (1992).
J. Rutledge and P. Taborek,Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 937 (1992).
N. Bigelow, P. J. Nacher, and J. Dupont-Roc,J. Low Temp. Phys. 89, 135 (1992).
E. Cheng, G. Mistura, H. C. Lee, M. H. W. Chan, M. W. Cole, C. Carraro, W. F. Saam, and F. Toigo,Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1854 (1993).
K. S. Ketola, S. Wang, and R. B. Hallock,Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 201 (1992).
G. Mistura, H. C. Lee, and M. H. W. Chan,J. Low Temp. Phys. 89, 633 (1992).
H. Kellay, D. Bonn, and J. Meunier,Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2607 (1993).
See for instance R. C. Richardson and E. N. Smith,Experimental techniques in condensed matter physics at low temperatures, page 310 (Addition-Wesley, 1988).
S. Teitel,J. of Low Temp. Phys. 46, 77 (1982), see in particular pp. 87-88.
M. E. Hayden, M. Cornut, and P. J. Nacher,Physica B 194-196, 677 (1994).
J. I. Gittleman and S. Bozowski,Phys. Rev. 128, 646 (1962). The fit ℛ(met) K = 7/T3 Kcm2/W taken from this reference may certainly be off more than an order of magnitude from the actual unknown Kapitza resistance between liquid helium and rubidium.
S. Dietrich, Contribution toPhase transitions and critical phenomena, Vol. 12, edited by C. Domb and J. Lebowitz (Academic Press, 1988).
See for instance pp. 48–49 of Ref. 20.
V. Ambegaokar, B. I. Halperin, D. R. Nelson, E. D. Siggia,Phys. Rev. B 21, 1806 (1980).
The value of μsat(T) is calculated from the saturated vapour pressure taken from R. L. Rusby and M. Durieux,Cryogenics 24, 363 (1984).
M. Schick and P. Taborek,Phys. Rev. B 46, 7312 (1992).
R. Bausch and R. Blossey,Phys. Rev. E 48, 1131 (1993).
D. Bonn, H. Kellay, and J. Meunier, to be published.
See for instance A. Adamson,Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, Sec. XVI-16 (Wiley Interscience, 1990).
There are some discrepancies in the values quoted in the literature, from 116 KÅ to 130 KÅ (see for instance D. O. Edwards and P. P. Fatouros,Phys. Rev. B 17, 2147 (1978)). We have taken the compromise suggested in this article.
Ref. 20, p. 60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
On leave of Rochester University.
Laboratoire de L'Ecole Normale Supérieure et de l'Universté Pierre et Marie Curie, associé au CNRS (URA 18).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Demolder, B., Bigelow, N., Nacher, P.J. et al. Wetting properties of liquid helium on rubidium metal. J Low Temp Phys 98, 91–113 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00754070
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00754070